JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Admirably impeccable construction, tropicalization, beautiful design, ultra-smooth images from edge to edge, high-light tight.
Cons:Weight, Price???
Opinion:Exaggerated wide angle for quality and yield. There is no other optics that can withstand comparison. It churn out images of absolute sharpness from edge to edge. The backlight tightness is so high that no flare or ghost interferes with the Raw quality. Very useful the scale of depth of field (common to all serious lenses like Zeiss House) that allows you to preset the focus before framing, to speed up the shooting procedure. The Price??? The quality is worth and you pay.
Pros:impeccable construction. Elegance and finish at the top. Metal. Ease of use amazing. Focus by sniper. Image quality of the highest level.
Cons:I just bought, for the moment no cons.
Opinion:I did it again thirty test shots. I have the version with Canon attack, use it with the 5D Mark III. I thought I would find heavy (it weighs more than 800 gr.), Instead mounted on the mark III, without Battery grip, is so balanced, you do not notice the weight. With battery grip I have yet to try it. The focus, though with standard slide of the mark III, is spectacular, the ring moves smoothly with micrometer precision, there are no friction whatsoever, nor excessive smoothness. Bracket, focheggi, Beep! et voila ... shooting. Thirty shots (it's the first time in my life that shooting with a manual focus lens, so I have no experience in the use of MF lenses), I just blew it uno.rnUltima note, price € 1,690. Li is worth all.
Pros:Extremely robust construction, optical quality, resistance to reflections, presence aperture ring and scale of the depth of field
Cons:weight and high price
Opinion:I could try this light for a short time, but enough to decide not to replace my Zeiss 21 zf2.rnLa made, in fact, was exactly the same, as they could possibly be deduced from the number of lenses and groups was identical (16 elements 13 groups) .rnIn practice it thinks that compared to the decommissioned 21mm essentially have changed the building (the current one seems even more solid), aesthetics (which may or may not), the weight (now increased to about 2 ounces) and, for the occasion, the price (of course increased !!!). rnIl 50 / 1.4 and 85 mm / 1.4 mm seems to be the only optics whose optical scheme has been revised. rnFabio
Cons:Weight, price, high but to date (January 2015) does not come to € 2,000.00 !!!
Opinion:It 'a goal by impeccable construction, beautiful to see, a metal hood that when assembled makes a wonderful designe, not comparable with anything else on the market. And 'robust and knows robusto.rnCome lens is phenomenal. The shadows are open and the phenomenal detail is enhanced by the excellent micro-contrast. It has beautiful colors and raw really require very few interventions. It changes color in black and white, popping up an incredible amount of shades. There are most distorted excessive. To be fair I should say that in practice just are not there, but at 100% magnification you notice a "nothing", that surely Nikonisti Canonists or they will look like a beam. Therefore, it lends itself well to works of architecture. The edges is present a minimum of chromatic aberration. Usually not to absolutely boredom, because it appears only under certain rare conditions and light. Everything else is superb and highly distinctive. It also works well in the whole beertura. No important diluce dropped to bordi.rnLa made ufoco manual forces in a traditional way to photograph. The fact that it does not have the automatic focus, opens to all the advantages of a photograph conceived and obliges to an extreme concentration. And 'divertentimento pure state. The focus is percisissima and the ring is smooth and balanced. The confirmation of focus by the sensors af works fine. It takes a little 'practice, but then you work with fluidity. Council a slide focus of quality and not those glasses scraped with sandpaper that put the house (Canon or Nikon that are).
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
