user102873 | sent on December 13, 2018
Pros: Everything, sharpness, compactness, weight, field curvature, chromatic aberrations, autofocus, construction, in short, love at first sight.
Cons: It definitely does not have an affordable price but few times I have seen such quality in such a small lens.
Opinion: This is the first opinion I write about Juza. I've been trying, in these months, targets for the Sony FE system, so far I have used my Canon EF via Sigma MC-11 adapter and now I want to reduce weights and clutter starting from wide angles, last week I took the Sony FE 24 f1.4 GM which is very nice and sharp but my and Just think I was suffering from a high field curvature on the right of the frame, returned to the sender and bought a new one on Amazon that I still have to get there, then I took a Laowa 15 F2 Zero-D, built very well but, compared with the Zeiss 18 f2.8 Batis , it looks broken. The Zeiss was love at first sight, I admit that it has a strange shape, very flamed, unusual, but it is well built, well balanced on the A7RIII, autofocus fast and silent, the LED tuner is not bad, a touch of modernity that can come in handy in the dark, apart from the Focus Ring The rest is all metal and therefore cold as ice these days but sharp as a blade. Few lenses have made me do wow (speaking of the "full Frame" format) as I hail them, I know the FE 16-35 F 2.8 GM is much appreciated but I really wanted something compact and this Zeiss is. See all that detail up almost to the edges even at f2.8 (and up to F 6.3, at F8 you begin to see the effects of diffraction) in a weight of 330 grams well it's not a little thing considering how big and heavy the Sigma Art For example,. Beautiful and Costosetto, but it is a little guy with a nice character, vignette a bit ' to all opening me nothing dramatic, chromatic aberrations present but contained, the Sony 24 GM I found it slightly worse in this regard but, to tell the truth, the Batis I have not tried it yet in with Troluce and in areas of high brightness, the distortion is present but nothing excessive for a wide angle, indeed, I've seen worse. You have to keep in mind that it is really small, weighs little and does not have a protruding bulb lens as it is fashionable in recent years and is therefore easily filterable. Only flaw for me? The lack of a second ring as for the GM lenses to control the aperture aperture or a customizable button but I'll survive. I would have preferred a 15 mm type Distagon and if, by chance, they will also make a 12 or 14 mm version I will put in the queue to buy it and if the Sony 24 GM continue to give me the same problems as the first I tried I throw absolutely on the Batis 25 F2 and so many greetings. This 18 mm I love it already. Wonderful, worth every euro that costs! Loved. |