JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Accuracy, speed, image quality, boken, minimum fire distance
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:I say I do not like zooming and work mainly with wide-angle optics but you know: a 70/200 in the optical kit will never end up unused. After being passed from Canon to Sony, first A7 Series then A9, I hired for some photos and video work this GM zoom range. The quality of the overall picture is great, I would say almost as much as the Canon 400 2.8, and I immediately realized that I was dealing with a real-life lens at the top. In the aftermath of working days I brought this lens to all the possible extremes both in terms of fire and light conditions. Difficult if not impossible, at least with A9, blur a picture. Waiting for a bride in front of the church c was an unexpected and I was struck with a truck that did not have to be there. I'm looking for a position to get the bride in the car arriving and suddenly I realize that it was late and I had the last minute to immortalize that moment. There is no time to frame the camera point to the eye subject, without letting the eye on the viewfinder in full sunlight, and then press the buttonclick. Result? Perfect and very beautiful picture. Other sensation I was lucky to take the right time but the likelihood that the photo was slightly blurred was high. When I saw it on the PC monitor I was astonished. I realized that this optic is really superior to any other one on the market with equal features and price. Zoom does not crush the image and if you shoot at 2.8 the boken and gorgeous at any focal point, and remains beautiful and clean even zooming on a distant and small subject as a full-length person occupying a small portion of the shot. The subject is always in focus and the tridimensionality with the background and embarrassing for Canon's analogue and worse for Nikon. The stabilizer allows you to shoot free-hand video if you have a culturist arm, which is impossible with any other focal-like optics. I see there are still few reviews but many votes and the average is 8.6. I would like to know how many of the users Juza have ever had in the hands of a zoom in this price range and with such a high quality overall. To make an econ comparisonif this zoom costs 3,000 euros the Canon should cost a maximum of 1,700. Obviously it is my opinion. rn
Pros:Sharpness - Precision - Zoom - Bokeh - and much more, and I love to die for it
Cons:Nothing (not even the price)
Opinion:I've taken it from just a few days, and it's simply the best mirror tones for sony. Accurate, stabilized, solid, and wonderfully sharp. The bokeh is of unique authenticity (like all sony G Master optics). If you want, you can fit a converter, made for this optic (there are 2: one is 1.4x and the other 2x), so you save a possible 100-400mm of the G Master. The "no" cost is prohibitive when compared to when it was launched but who has a Sony A7RII, after the wonderful 24-70mm of the G Master, this is to be done absolutely, not because of its versatility but also for the Its precious composition worthy of 70-200mm.
Pros:Actually, there are ONLY pro ... minimum focus at 0.96 ... rnTStop 2.9. Instant AF. stabilizer that seems to 200mm mounted on a tripod. shutter without the slightest fear to 1/15. even less.
Cons:It has no ... even against the price
Opinion:I saw that they have given a weighted average vote of 8.8 ... strange considering that quell'aborto of canon 70-200 2.8 (which I own) is not even comparable to this ... from the minimum focus that is scary (0.96) and that the actual transmission of light is 2.9 .. not as the canon that eventually and almost 4.0 .. but saw them there ... CANON wrote tuuuuutto goes well .. rnrnLente (GOODS) in factories in Japan ... built better than the canon ... EYE-Af ... stabilizing cross with IBIS in leotards and OSS on slow .. 40mpixel of rosoluzione .. no distortion. AC .. non-existent and does not have that crap ghosting effect of the canon and nikon ... and does not suffer from focus breathing .. rnTROPICALIZZATO proof tub ... 2 mode stabilization .. 3 buttons (mirror) and programmable switches for the focusing range. Boleh spectacular .rnrnChi gave votes to the lens ... deserves a value to shoot at life with a machine disposable.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
