|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 20, 2017 Pros: Size, weight, versilità, file quality Cons: battery life, no input for external remote control Opinion: Jack used with 2mesi life, to use as a second body, excellent yield with L series lenses, of course it is not as fast as a DSLR but if used in great churning out excellent files. rnUna flaw in my opinion is the external attack without the remote control, thus preventing the use of an interval timer (for example, star-trail) rn |
 | sent on October 25, 2016 Pros: Compact, more portable, file quality Cons: Af slow and imprecise, battery life, lack viewfinder Opinion: Good mirrorless, without many pretensions, you get good photos from great dettaglio.personalmente I miss the viewfinder also having the 6d, does not compare, and as dynamic range as ergonomia.Ma the use for the outputs read only the lens kit, and I always have with me the chance to take pictures of qualità.L adapter for ef objectives is useful, but up to 50cc, the biggest you lose the convenience of a compact and lightweight mirrorless kit. |
 | sent on March 15, 2016 Pros: Compact, lightweight, versatile, holds well the high iso Cons: Nobody Opinion: Bought at MediaWorld more out of curiosity than anything else I was thrilled by the quality / price ratio. Churning out some really outstanding files then paired with 22 mm f2 fits comfortably in a pocket. I do not miss the absence of the viewfinder, then being completely touch gives me the opportunity to set it with a single finger. Like most of the mirrorless has a slow AF so disinclined to use in sports, for the kind of photography in which I work I do not penalize me !! The battery life is not his specialty as all mirrorless, but with an extra battery is solved !!! Now I leave home my only 6D and go out the small EOS M! If we want to be picky the only missing the tilting display that in certain situations you feel the need! However, today I would sell my 6D willingly, I just small EOS M. With the adapter included in the kit can be mounted all Canon lenses and this makes it really versatile! What about ... really happy! |
| sent on January 30, 2016 Pros: Compactness, quality 'image, versatility', quality 'constructive, price (to date) Cons: Autofocus (especially when compared to that of an SLR high-end, compared to that of a compact, there is no 'problem), battery not suitable for use at "daily", but only for an output (best buy an extra battery), the touch screen is not always practical (in general, not that of this model), unsuitable for a photograph "fast" (sports, wildlife, etc.) Opinion: Bought by Media World (web) in a kit with 22, 18-55 and flash to a staggering price = 236 euros! Leveraging a generic promotion + a 25% less in the specific giornata.Ne are very happy to use that I do (walks with my dog) without sobbarcarmi the weight of my equipment reflex.Soddisfa fully my needs 'qualitative d' image. At that price I do not think you could ask for more '. |
 | sent on December 05, 2015 Pros: Compactness, constructive quality, ease of use, image quality for the price, magic lantern. Cons: Autofocus, battery, dynamic range, objective system still too poor. Opinion: Bought by mediaworld at 299 with 18-55 and 22mm kits, a crazy offer. If you find it for that price do not think twice. It's an amazing car, the photos are rich in details, the colors are saturated, the Touch display allows you to focus on whatever you want. The first two problems mentioned are somewhat resolutable: if you do not need instant autofocus, the first one is already fixed, the second is solved by purchasing batteries upgraded from 2000 Mah (2 x 20 euros) compared to the 890 supplied with the machine. In short, a really good canon home product that only has 2 major defects. UPGRADING AFTER 2 YEARS: My first camera, I learned to photograph and after I recognized the limits I sold it. Low focus in even slightly tough conditions, bad dynamic range, ISO in the standard for the band where it was placed at pretty pious optics and time park, with the exception of the 22mm f2.0.rnThere will be nothing to say about the design quality : a brick. Really robust and durable, made forlast. Excellent touchscreen, very responsive and responsive, a comfort that will then regret in rooms that do not have it. The battery also pitiful, it was unloaded in a moment by only using the screen. But beware of compatibility with MAGIC LANTERN, which allows you to timelapse in the room, programmed shots, BULB posing timers and more. In short, if you do not want the most out of your room and you want to spend very little, this is the machine that's for you, otherwise I would not feel comfortable advising you. |
  | sent on November 02, 2015 Pros: Light weight, price, quality / price ratio, excellent image quality Cons: Lack viewfinder af slow, battery 200/250 shots Opinion: It was my first camera, I chose it for its compactness, for the fantastic 22mm f2, and because the adapter can be fitted with all Canon lenses without any problem or disability. ISO has a good yield, excellent image quality (same sensor 650D and 60D), portability unique: with 22mm put it in his jacket pocket. After a year of use, I decided to sell it to move to 60d, because I realized that I have so needs its compactness but instead of better ergonomics, and because f is really limiting, besides being very slow, in conditions low light often does not hook own. After all it is a good camera that gave me a lot of satisfaction, but now with the 60d I am much better;) |
 | sent on September 18, 2015 Pros: Handy, solid feel, 22 mm optical fantastic, the touch display, 18 mpix Cons: Autofocus is not actually a missile, the battery does not last long Opinion: Although now is out of production and on the market now is the M3, MediaW is getting rid of the EOS M at attractive prices, I have taken in the kit for 249 € (camera + 22mm adapter + EF + flash). I was not convinced to take it because of some negative reviews mainly sull'autofocus but since I prefer scenic and subject semi-static because I said no and then saw the price. Well after several shots I was very pleased by the sharpness and colors of pictures I mostly about optics fixed very bright. He does not fit in a pocket, but in my purse and it is not heavy and bulky like a reflex. My opinion is therefore extra-positive for the price paid (by the sum of the individual parts of the kit, is well over € 550). |
 | sent on May 26, 2015 Pros: compactness, materials, quality image, price Cons: lack viewfinder, autofocus slow perhaps, Battery Life Opinion: I purchased the eos m just a matter of space, and I must say that I am satisfied. found at a price UNCOMMON ... 239 € with adapter ring, flash, and the stratospheric ... 22mm lens kit has a really amazing quality and come together in the breast pocket (the small one) :)! maybe it's true, the autofocus is in a bit slow, but if we do not do photo hunting or sporting shot is just fine, I for example landscapes and street not suffer this "slowness". the body is very well built and gives a feeling of quality and solidity. surely the world mirrorless systems + boasts cutting edge but at this price is hard to beat. CANON and the quality is the award-winning sensor mounted, returns really of high quality images. I repeat, at this price I am overjoyed with my purchase and would recommend it to people like me, want something compact but powerful! |
 | sent on April 08, 2015 Pros: now bargain price, portability, image quality identical to that of the various 550d, 600d, 100d and 650D through the sensor 18MP APS-C, well-defined screen and menu very intuitive as other EOS. Cons: For someone slow autofocus, but not for me.rnmancanza an electronic viewfinder or at least in Galilean because sunny days on the screen can not see anything and it's up to frame groping. Opinion: Bought new 250 € with 22mm f2 lens and f-m, adapter and external flash would say that that price is not anything like it around. (Go to Mediaworld online, I never thought that they had the lowest price of the web ...) rnLe compact evolved the kind of Canon s110 and s120 cost more or less the same and have only a sensor 1 / 1,7.rnGrafica menu equal to that of the other Canon cameras, so very intuitive. rnHo found the responsiveness of the autofocus absolutely adequate to my needs. If you want to shoot landscapes (even in low light), portraits and static subjects it is perfect. it probably is not for fast-moving objects, but not my caso.rnHo bought apart 18-55 F3.5-5.6 IS used paid only 110 € and it seems to me that as a definition can not be foodies. The only drawback is the very low resistance flare.rnrnIn definitive consigliatissima.rn |
 | sent on March 02, 2015 Pros: Smaller than an SLR especially with the 22mm, the touch screen is a nice convenience, I'll always carry the camera while the other hand ... With the adapter ring there I mount all my Canon optics and makes great quality photos. The price now is beneficial. I bought 400 € with the ring adapter and external flash + 22 mm and at this price is not the best in the world mirrorless taking into account that the optics is really fantastic. Cons: Autofocus although with the latest firmware is good enough for most occasions. Sometimes missing the optical viewfinder. Lack of dials to quickly set operating modes. Poor battery life, you need to stock up for a full day. Opinion: I bought it because I wanted something comfortable to carry around instead of reflex that is heavy and unwieldy. With the aim to 22mm is a "must have" and makes photos really fantastic. I took the white, the color more appropriate in my opinion. In addition, the weight and strength from a strong impression of solidity, a real "tank". As for the auto focus, well it's true what they say around. It is not fast but acceptable in most of the conditions of use. The consiglerei definitely and buy back because the value for money is unbeatable. Now is also the outgoing M3 then probably is even lower prices. 8.5rnCompratela vote! |
user20639  | sent on January 16, 2015 Pros: Image quality and file, robust, practical and easy to maneuver. Touchscreen. APSC sensor Cons: Battery 200 shots, but also less. Autofocus slow, but sufficient, not flash incorporato.rn Opinion: I chose this car for the journey long and bumpy. It cost a lot, but is used to seed new 200 euro and offers a lot. A real tank that fits in your pocket and can be scrambled, can suffer some shock but without consequences, the display first, shows no graffio.rnPer the way I've tried 4 already and I had various problems. This M far is reliable and has a degree of performance, robustness and quality that is unparalleled for a pocket lighter APSC. I think that's the car I was looking for, paired with 22mm.rnBuna tightness at high iso, Raw excellent workability. Can mount all the objectives Canon. |
 | sent on November 29, 2014 Pros: Quality of materials very good image quality up to 1600 ISO great value for money paid 299 with 22m + + flash adapter ring Cons: Lack viewfinder, autofocus lenteza Opinion: I bought it to have a body to bring always behind with 22 and wanting to perfect and I tried to accopiarla with various optical possessions, except for the slow pace of focus I found no difficulty to focus even in low light 70 200 II is a duplicating canon III series perfect photos recommended as vote 9 |
 | sent on November 24, 2014 Pros: quality 'of materials, traspotabiltà with 22 mm, sensor aps-c (economic) Cons: slow autofocus, even worse the eos 1000d 2008 Battery Life Opinion: bought together with the 22mm because I wanted a good camera to take almost always around without bags and cases, I must say that for this purpose is excellent .I bought the kit -body + 22mm + flash + adapter 339.00 € that is the price of a good compact camera, which the port rnper everywhere (with a spare battery) taking photos and video when the opportunity presents itself without fear of ruining it with a good quality ', as the 22 mm lens is a good bright and clear .rnavendo other canon lenses mounted with the adapter autofocus is disastrous, but for my use is unimportant because it will be matched to m only rarely. |
| sent on November 23, 2014 Pros: trasporbilita ', sensor, park optic reflex Cons: for now nothing Opinion: I have just bought, I have not been able to deepen its capacity ', I did some tests just to see a little' menu ', but' I was already convinced, I have also Nikon D700, you know, and 'a 'else, but' this eos m I rediscovered the pleasure to take me behind the camera often, however with the camera bags backpacks etc.etc., then eventually to 90% do more 'or less the same picture, then the possibility 'in the future to use all optical canon ..... I was willing to take the fuji xt1, but' the price I braked immediately, we will see in a year as will be 'dropped ..... |
 | sent on May 19, 2014 Pros: image quality, ability to mount targets pro (with adapter), lightweight and robust Cons: lack of viewfinder, autofocus slow. Opinion: interesting .... car is in my hands for about 3 settimane.rnlo shooting in RAW and manual settings make certainly interesting. The picture quality is outstanding. However I found remarkable high ISO noise ... rnIo I bought it to have a body to handle and lightweight. Indeed, it is quite compact, but already supplied the 18-55 makes it a bit cumbersome ... rnTutto added to the price seems like a good buy. |
 | sent on February 24, 2014 Pros: Image quality, lightweight SLR in all respects, and small conpatta Cons: Absolutely no! Opinion: I bought it as a second body for when I go for a walk or when I walk around without having behind the bag with the 1DX and objectives .. The various hold in one hand .. Small and excellent quality .. Always with you .. ISO high .. Settings .. 18mpx SLR normal .. I am very happy .. Highly recommended! I also took the adapter to put the optical ef .. And use the 35 1.4 or 85 1.8 is really incredible for a camera body so small |
 | sent on December 16, 2013 Pros: The price performance ratio, especially with the 22 f2 is a great deal at the end of the M costs less than a compact, solid construction Cons: The 'AF is wrong, the slowness has been patched with the Fw 2:02 but its efficiency remains unsatisfactory, they keys are too few, and those that are poorly managed, missing accessories but mostly lacking goals! Opinion: My opinion on this machine and although having given a negative 6, the problem is that it seems thrown out of a car just to say "hey even the Canon has a mirrorless" but it was not at all convinced of what I was doing, the problems of AF and its slowness have been solved with the FW 2 (normal ... it has become a lightning war) less than 9 months later and did not solve the problem that too often, the camera just can not focus. rnIl form factor chosen by Canon then leave things as they are, if you want to make an ultra-compact car since at least the accessories to make it adaptable in situations where compactness is not needed so much, but no, he did so with the Nikon J1 with the new additional grip (better than nothing) rnDi an electronic viewfinder even in pensarcirnAlmeno optics, there is the classic 18-55 is not bad, 22 is gorgeous .... and a 11-22 anonymous ... the end ... 18 months 3 optics, a large supporto.rnParliamo then of 'STM? An engine made for the video, too bad it's the 22 that 40 are washing rumoree nothing for lightning to focus light not ottimale.rnrnMa what I find really incredible is the apparent lack of intelligence on the part of 'R & D of the Canon (which spends $ 20m in research), already on the machine, there are a few keys vengno and also wasted, I speak of the button for video recording in "photo" remains without function and no possibility to program it as you please, on my old SX210IS can be programmed at will .... AND NO M rnrnHo preferred to sell it immediately as long as I lose "little" because I stink machine "dead" coming evil |
| sent on December 05, 2013 Pros: definitely the best price in the world for quality of CSC, build quality excellent in all respects which makes it perhaps even better than the 650D which takes the sensor and the software Cons: we wanted to at least the optical viewfinder as an option (see the CSC olympus), improved grip cm ² but more than decent, original battery 900 mah lasts no more than 250-300 shots, better buy a more compatible "large." Opinion: Solid in the hand, is a stainless steel block 300 grams, which gives you the idea from the beginning of a higher build quality than the price range in which it is located (plasticotti type sony nex 3n). the same applies to the lens in a kit that also completely metallic and solid. all the kit really excellent fattura.rnrnCon software ver.2 were solved the problems that have characterized the first months after launch (but thanks to which the price has halved and made this even more interesting csc). rnil software and functions are complete, by reflex, as it is the sensor and also the final quality of the shot, detail eccellente.rnrnEccellente three-inch touch display is very bright, if you want to save battery, however, best to use the physical buttons and let the brightness to 50 percent as of default.rnrninteressante the physical key to record videos of up to 50fps at 720p resolution (1080p at 30 fps). rnrninteressanti 2 programs one for HDR backlight and the other for portraits notturni.rnrnhobought the eos m to have results from SLR in a more compact body, recommended to all. |
  | sent on August 24, 2013 Pros: Practice, acceptable cost, excellent image quality, it is not in the pocket but solida.rnOttima video function with possibility of moving fire. Cons: the absence of an external electronic viewfinder rndurata poor battery 150/200 shots. rn Opinion: I purchased this mini camera with a little 'of skepticism, the cost is not abordabilissimo with 22 mm. f x reduction and flash, I immediately changed my mind, with the 22 you can always carry around and take beautiful pictures, I wanted to attack the 70 200 f 2.8 and 300 f 2.8 taking pictures of birds, a result comparable to the splendid reflex, clearly moving the situation changes, is not very fast and I do not think it's his uso.rnPratica intuitive controls you just get used to, splendid display. |
 | sent on August 06, 2013 Pros: solid does not look like a toy plasticky, same menu 'of SLR, even at high ISO shooting, excellent video (especially for possibility of changing the focus point with a touch screen), light to carry around without too much trouble. Cons: lack viewfinder but you do get used to, battery that lasts 150/200 shots (without video). Opinion: C but with the adapter ring distorts the function slim ergonomic eos M. We say that if I had to introduce my son to photography, without using an SLR, the EOS'd take the M. |
user5958 | sent on July 15, 2013 Pros: Portability, cost (paid € 330 in a kit with the 18-55), made at high iso for its category, high quality video, silent focusing. Cons: Battery life, sharpness of the lens in the kit, even with the latest firmware setting fire sometimes loses the shots. Opinion: Practice, small (although the zoom is not in your pocket), 330 € I would say that is an excellent compact. Too bad for the quality of the lens in a kit that does not do justice to the sensor with 18 megapixel and the excellent performance at high ISO could do much better. Fairly fast and responsive, and practical, was a good buy. I use it mainly as compact and as camcorder for filming family. Despite the low brightness of the lens F3.5 -5.6 excellent returns even in low light riprese.rnSarebbe interesting to try it with the EF adapter having but maybe you would lose the benefits due to the size. rnQuesto the link to some testing done on the machine: rnhttp :/ / www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=532004rn |
  | sent on July 12, 2013 Pros: cost (now it's less than 400, lens included), dimensions and low weight, touch screen, good image quality Cons: AF very slow, you can not mount an electronic viewfinder, poor battery life Opinion: I tried it out of curiosity and I was impressed ... the image quality is the same of the current APS-C (on the other hand the sensor is also used on 7D, 650D, 60D); dimensions are very minimal, as well as the weight. The touchscreen interface is really good and in some ways more intuitive and faster than that of the SLR. The main flaw of this camera is the AF quite poor, and the advice for those who make macro, landscapes and other genres 'static', and is not suitable for animals and action. |
 | sent on March 11, 2013 Pros: blow up .... to 'put in your pocket and go .... Cons: nothing Opinion: congratulations to CANON ... rnprovata adapter .... 5.6 with 400 spectacular photos with very little noise .. very definition rncon macro lenses ... like the 60 2.8 looks like a real SLR with a 100 2.8 macro is ums ago 'fear ... rnuna a small mirrorless senzore APSC from 18 mp allows you to aim high on the quality of images rnun new segment of the canon very appropriate |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
