|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maurizio Cascone www.juzaphoto.com/p/MaurizioCascone  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R6 Pros: 20mp, AF, ISO, Burst, Size, Dual SD Memory Slots, Cost Cons: Dimensions and lightness (If you use heavy optics, or supertele, you must use the BatteryGrip). Opinion: Alongside my 1 series bodies, it looks like a toy, but in terms of performance and responsiveness, it left me speechless. Excellent 20MP very manageable, if you photograph weddings, sports, and / or birdlife, with its generous burst of 20fps, wrapped the amount of files becomes very consistent, and this means that the cost and management of files does not become an ordeal. Putting a strain on during a sporting event, with the right AF settings, allowed me to take home more shots perfectly in focus, even in very critical conditions, promoted in full (I dare not think of the R3). sent on June 16, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Sharpness, 16mm, Aperture 2.8, Minimum AF distance, Dimensions, Weight, Cost Cons: Non-tropicalized, Sharpness at the edges Opinion: An optics certainly not perfect, but knowing how to exploit its talents, it gives you magnificent shots! Due to its size and weight, it always finds space in the backpack or even in the pocket, when you are in narrow environments or want to get a particular shot, it never disappoints you. Tropicalization would have been welcome, but for the paltry cost it has, that's okay. Do not expect an optics for sharp panoramas from angle to angle, for that go on the L series, but if you take advantage of the center of the frame, isolating the background is the top! sent on June 16, 2022 |
 | Canon 1DX Mark II Pros: Series 1, reactivity AF, AF to f/8 on all points, RED AF POINT, IQ, high ISO hold, top tropicalization, commands, 4K to 60fps, FullHD at 120fps, GPS, size and weight, etc. etc. Cons: I would have preferred a double Cfast 2.0 slot Opinion: Of the series 1 I had the 1D Mark III and then the 1DX (both fabulous), and now waiting for the release of the 1DX Mark III, I wanted to take this 1DX II... Na beast! I had to think again that it was a slight upgrade of the 1DX, the changes are there, among many things it is much more responsive, the AF of the latest generation and finally the point of RED AF (configurable in two lighting intensity), in Under the 5D Mark III and 5D Mark IV, I was having to try to figure out where the AF's point was, no more. The files are much more workable, and allow greater recoveries of the shadow areas. The HIGH ISO estate is superior to the fantastic 5D Mark IV. The 20mp are for my needs more than enough, I do not make exaggerated crop, I always prefer to compose the frame well according to my needs, then if you need a few megapixels more use the 5D Mark IV. The only flaw in my opinion, is the use of two CF and Cfast 2.0 formats, I would have preferred to have both slots with Cfast 2.0 (-5) Conclusion, I was very pleased with this 1DX Mark II (9.5) sent on November 14, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM Pros: Sharpness | F/2.8 | L Series | Colors | Contrast | tropicalization | Build quality. Cons: None worthy of note. Opinion: I state that photographer mainly in weddings and events, then the light optics are obligatory, the lack of stabilization is not felt in these areas since it is not necessary to freeze the action, maybe for landscapes and similar stuff would have done Comfortable but also you use the tripod. The brightness of this 16-35mm makes it perfect for reportage, a stop in more brightness than the F/4 version means that in low light you have a stop in less than ISO getting cleaner photos, then the rendering of this optic with its colors and Contrast make it a perfect lens for its kind. It is not a cheap and very light lens, it is a professional lens of the L series, therefore the top. For amateurs I recommend the F/4 version much cheaper and with almost equal overall yield plus has the stabilization that can help in certain circumstances, for professionals or advanced amateurs who work at the professional level then this is the lens that makes For you. I didn't get to try the previous version so I can't give opinions about it. I hope this my opinion has been of help, a cordial greeting greeting and good light to all!!! ;) sent on June 30, 2018 |
 | Canon 5D Mark IV Pros: Dynamic range, holding ISO 30 mp Cons: 4 k at 30 frames per second Opinion: Excellent room, immediate feeling looked identical commands to the 5 d mark II, which is very convenient the touch screen for navigating the menu and scrolling images. I was afraid of 30mp, since I do many weddings and reportage, but I immediately changed my mind is the right balance between resolution and ability to crop without losing much detail, of course must be coupled with high quality optics. The dynamic range and sensitivity high ISO capabilities are significantly improved from the younger sister the 5 d III, second only to 1DX mark II. GPS and WiFi did not use them, but they could be helpful in certain circumstances. In the video, I was impressed with the accuracy and reliability of the dual-pixel AF a bomb! While I was a bit disappointed for only 30 fps in 4 k. Conclusions: excellent machine, much more perdormante of 5 d III a difference you can see and feel. If you want to upgrade from 5 d III do not hesitate minimante! sent on April 26, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: Lightweight, sharp, stabilized and tropicalized. Cons: Nothing Opinion: Amazing goal, marriages or still life is definitely one of the best in the market, if not the best seen even the years he has on his shoulders, he can keep his head and be astonished even with current full megapixel reflexes - Sharpness 10 / 10rnMolto Versatile and lightweight to wear around, unlike the brother MP-E65mm (more suitable for studio work), you will always find a space in your bag to carry it always with you, with nice weather or rain due to tropicalization. And thanks to the stabilizer you will be able to take Macro even with free hand (naturally light permitting), for portraiture ... spectacular! Portability 10 / 10rnConclusions: Amateur use, I would recommend it to anyone who wants to approach macro photography seriously. Professional use (of course within Canon) is a Must! RnUn cordial greeting to all readers of Juzaphoto, Maurizio Cascone. sent on May 09, 2017 |
 | Canon 1100D Pros: Cost, lightweight and compact, image rendering, perfect as a first approach to the world of Reflex Cons: smooth grip Opinion: It was the first SLR that made me get into the SLR world. After several years I bought the 5D Mark III clearly another planet, but back to the 1100D, which allowed just got beautiful shots, and I do a long apprenticeship, before you can move on to a FF. The small size and lightweight make it a perfect room to always carry around and then to exploit it to the fullest. The council closed eyes for those who are beginners and do not want to shell out a figure exaggerated. sent on February 20, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
