|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fotomistico www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fotomistico  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D750 Pros: Dynamic range; held high ISO; autofocus; display tilting; ergonomics; image quality at the top; Cons: Shutter limited to 1/4000 Opinion: Machine truly exceptional, excellent in all respects. Do not call it the heir of D700, because every product has a story to se.rnPer regards the mere performance, you can certainly define a true flagship: excellent viewfinder, phenomenal autofocus (works very well even in difficult lighting conditions), the meter is really good and the sensor a gem. The dynamic range is impressive, the levels of the D800 at low ISO, with the same performance of Df at high sensibilità.rnOffre a handy display tilting the landscape is such a treat to the point of not being able to pretty much do without. The commands are placed in the right place, the possibilities for customization are almost endless. Coming from the D800 was a bit 'hesitant as regards ergonomics and robustness of the product. I had to think again: in Nikon must have studied very well this product from an ergonomic point of view. Excellent grip, insightsthere the various comandi.rnL'unico limit of this machine is the minimum time of laying, equal to 1/4000 second. But you can live happily the same, I believe that he never passed this exposure value in my life, not even in full giorno.rnPromossa with honors, definitely recommended. A true all-round! sent on January 15, 2015 |
 | Nikon Df Pros: sensor from the amazing performance; construction; viewfinder; yield at high ISO unparalleled; old-style charm; Auto ISO fantastic; Cons: One SD slot for more placed in the battery compartment; available AF points too massed in center of frame; absence of presets; Opinion: The Nikon Df is a machine unique. It can not be compared to any other SLR currently on the market. This mix of retro-style and modern technology is something unique. Leaving aside the promotional campaign of the well-photography, just a red herring but given the sales figures it worked, I come to dunque.rnIl "heart" of this reflex consists of the magnificent sensor that equips the flagship D4 / D4S. And with that I said a lot: high dynamic range, high ISO performance record-breaking, magnificent colors pellicola.rnLa-like body is well made, solid feel is felt immediately. It is not entirely constructed of magnesium alloy, as the central part is made from a block of polycarbonate. But that does not mean it's cheap: the assemblies are impeccable, all the rings in metal and well profilate.rnIl viewfinder is the same as the D800, so magnificent. The only sore point is the housing of the only SD card placed inside the gono battery. This is a choice a bit "poor" for a camera that is inserted by Nikon in the group of "professional" .rnIl AF system is the same as the Nikon D600 / 610: fast, accurate even in low light conditions but with a provision of points too massed in center of frame. No rare occasions when you are forced to focus and then recompose to place the subject at the edges ... rnI controls are something unique: all "manual", the old setting. Who has had the opportunity to shoot with the old analog that characterized the 70/80 will not have problems to familiarize yourself with Df. For all those who are "born" with the modern SLR will be a real "new world". rnQuesto can be a problem: the technology over the years has been going on as well as design. A next-generation digital SLR lets you do everything by two nuts and several keys all at your fingertips. RNLA Df is an "analog" with digital heart and each command a ghierdedicated to. This is at the expense of speed of use in some areas. rnNon is a machine for all, obviously. You have to know what you buy otherwise are thrown to the wind a lot of money and you are not satisfied dell'acquisto.rnMolto define Df the heir of D700: it is not so. You can be driven to think that way, taking into account that it is equipped with the sensor of the flagship. We must not forget, however, that outside of the sensor and viewfinder has nothing to do with the D4. rnih synthesis, a reflex that "divide": either you love it or you hate it. I'm tempted to advise only those who are looking for a machine "definitive" in certain areas such as landscape, street, portrait, pictures "reasoned" .rnSconsigliatissima for sport, hunting or if you require high operating speed. rnChiudo with a note: try it anyway. The files that churns are a wonder and this sometimes weighs on the final choice. Shooting in light conditions almost absent pushing fino to 25,600 ISO to discover that the file keeps a cleaning and a detail never seen prima.rn sent on March 18, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm X100s Pros: Impressive image quality, high ISO performance, build quality, vintage charm; yield of the lens; Cons: Autofocus still to be improved: it certainly is the best car of the X series (as of today, July 2013, ed) from the point of view of performance in the MAF. However, not always the focus is precise. Opinion: The Fuji X100S is without a doubt the most fascinating machine in use today: that air saucy, that image "old style" 60s, all that metal brushed in plain sight, then covered with imitation leather that is very "casual ". But behind his image "cool" you will discover a lot of exciting content. The sensor is the highlight of this machine: without a shadow of a doubt the best APS-C sensor ever produced to date. The quality of the files is nothing short of spectacular. The dynamic range is very high, it is not hard to recover shadows and highlights where necessary. Jpg files are the best I've ever got to see, so much so that when I get a little X100S not snap his neck almost never in raw. The white balance is impeccable, shows no obvious color cast. The lens that is attached is stratospheric: already at f2, 8 the sharpness is very high in every part of the frame. The perspective distortion is almost zero, the ACssente.rnLa performance at high ISO puzzled: I took in conditions of very low light sensitivity of 6400 ISO is I dropped my jaw on the floor once viewed the file. The noise is almost absent, the file has definitely some small artifacts due to the reduction of grain but no car I've tested to date, except for the 5dmkIII the result of which is very similar but we are talking about a full-frame SLR , has been able to offer to meglio.rnL 'only flaw found to date is definitely the AF system: although there has been a marked improvement over the older x100, on some occasions in low lucela MAF is not very accurate. We must say that the technicians Fuji put much input from users, so I trust that soon will be released an update of the 'AF that makes it finally worthy of this magnificent sensor. (At the end of July 2013 sees the launch of a new firmware). sent on July 18, 2013 |
 | Cosina 100mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: Quality / price ratio; Sharpness; Defocused; Cons: Construction; Slow AF; Opinion: Lens that has a quality / price ratio in my opinion unbeatable. Allows you to enter the world of macro spending an amount irrisoria.rnLa image quality that manages to offer very high. The sharpness is his strong point, the very blurred gradevole.rnSi is saved during the production of the quality of the outer shell, but the project is optical quality. The AF is slow and noisy (it uses the engine of the SLR), but it is advisable to make macro focus manuale.rnChe say, recommended ... sent on May 22, 2013 |
 | Nikon D800 Pros: Unrivaled image quality, well-built body and sealed, nothing short of astonishing dynamic range, recovery shadows stellar performance at high ISO amazing ability to shoot in DX format. Cons: Ergonomics in some respects improvable. Opinion: Exceptional car. A sensor as on a Full Frame SLR no one had ever seen. Dynamic range without equal. The ability to work on files in post are virtually endless. The recovery of the shadows and highlights is impressive. The detail that can be captured is stunning. For a landscaper this machine is a godsend. RAW files are churning out a pleasure. The yield at high ISO is great: the texture is compact, the colors never mixed. The popular fear of the "shake" is just a legend. It takes in a bit more forethought during shooting, but I was able to shoot with the 70-200mm to 200mm at 1/60 without any problems (always with VR included of course). RnConsigliatissima no doubt. Certainly more than the rival house sectoral Canon, the 5D Mark III that I have not hesitated to call "universal machine". It has a lower burst but image quality without a doubt higher. sent on March 07, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, CA very contained, stabilizer monstrous, AF speed, lightness. Cons: At the moment no, the collar can be useful only if you shoot with entry level SLR. Opinion: Nikon goes to fill that void that for many years has been felt, especially for people like me who comes from Canon.rnQuesto new 70-200mm has a sharpness monstrous levels brother f2.8. Already good at full aperture, the fuzzy is very pleasant. The color rendering is very similar to that of the Nikkor 16-35mm f4.rnHo had in the past the rival Canon 70-200mm f4 IS: I can certainly say that this new lens Nikon has a yield very similar to bianchino.rnConsigliatissimo, undoubtedly ! sent on January 17, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Building, fast and precise AF system, customization, held at high ISO, image quality excellent. In my opinion it is the most balanced machine currently on the market. A body that allows you to do everything to a very high standard, from sports, to landscaping, from the picture in the naturalistic study. Cons: Dynamic range: the low sensitivity of the recovery shadows closed is almost impossible. Opinion: The new Canon 5D Mark III would not dare to call it the "ultimate machine". 5 years ago Nikon launched a similar product (with the technology of the time): it was called d700. Many in house Canon envied the nikonisti that gem which for many years has been indicated as a point of reference in the photo. Everyone has inside of him always hoped that Canon sfornasse such a product, a 5D Mark II with AF at the height of the machine and high speed operation. Well, this product has seen the light and is called 5d Mark III.rnUn sensor fantastic, not overly dense, which has an impressive high ISO performance and a very high dynamic range (although less than that of the d800). An excellent AF system, the best existing at the time (it is the same as the 1DX), a latest generation processor that works very well. A viewfinder with 100% coverage and a customization infinita.rnL'unico defect, if you really want to find one, is the "softness" of the jpeg file. The de-noise is a little too invadenyou, and often makes the image too soft. But for those who (like me and the vast majority) shooting in RAW and post-produce the pc this is not a problem. rn sent on December 04, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, build quality, image stabilization, tropicalization. Cons: Quality global variable from a specimen to another, distortion at 24mm. Opinion: Definitely the best standard zooms currently available. Compared to a specimen that I had three years ago a completely different lens. Sharpness scary levels far more famous 24-70mm f2, 8, very high resistance to flare, much smaller distortions. rnForse the biggest flaw of the 24-105mm f4 is this: the quality varies from model to esemplare.rnParlando with a Canon technician, I was told that these units are free of defects. rnChe say, a nice surprise. I use it as an all-rounder lens, mounted on my 5D Mark III gives shots really superbi.rnVivamente recommended. sent on December 04, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Lightweight, compact, sealed, excellent resistance to flare. Cons: Sharpen the edges below f8, chromatic aberration and distortion very obvious on FF. Opinion: A lens that every user "Canon" should have, for the versatility of use. On FF you go to dall'ultragrandangolare focal right for the story. A lens built in a sublime and tropical conditions, robust and very leggera.rnOffre a very high sharpness, provided you shut down more than f8. At the widest apertures yield the edges I find it rather poor, but it is to say that being a wide-angle zoom you should use almost exclusively over f8.rnSicuramente offers more than what it costs, without a shadow of a doubt to be preferred to the more expensive 16-35mm f2, 8 II that at the level of sharpness is not certain migliore.rn sent on December 04, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, contrast, stabilizer, color. The best all-rounder for APS-C Cons: Equipment: is offered without bag and without a hood. For a lens that costs 650 Euro ... rnVignettatura (corrected in post with a click). RnDistorsione accentuated 15mm Opinion: The lens "definitive" to report on APS-C. I published a book containing photos of Paris that I have won several competitions: nitidizza, contrast, edges made exceptional! Never disappoints, the stabilizer allows you to shoot handheld up to one fifth of a second with a minimum of experience (and a steady hand). RnUn little pesantuccio, this is, but mounted on a 7d is well balanced. Very solid construction, although not tropicalized. Had been fixed f4 would be a must ... rnPer me, the best standard zoom on APS-C on the market today. sent on October 26, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Construction, fast AF, optical performance, colors Cons: Weight, lack VR Opinion: The optical excellence. So call this lens to those who seek an opinion. Sharpest already f2, 8 even at the edges, very fast in focus. Construction nothing short of excellent, made entirely of alloy magnesio.rnLa use as only lens for weddings and reportage. It offers superb colors. If the lens is a must have, call it even if we make a comparison of economic cost / prestazioni.rnSulla d700 is a show, never let you down! sent on October 18, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Extreme sharpness already at RT, fantastic colors, resistance to flare, construction, excellent stabilizer Cons: Slight vignetting at f4 correctable with one click post Opinion: The landscape and reportage are my favorite genres. For a long time I wanted a quality wide angle that would allow me to mount filters. I had read mixed reviews on this lens but never having had the chance to try it I was a little uncertain about the purchase. In the end I am convinced, in preference to the 14-24mm that does not allow me to mount filters vite.rnRisultato: I was amazed! Tested both at f8 can not be distinguished. Sharpest already at room temperature, has a resistance to flare impressive for a wide angle. The build quality is as good as you would expect from a perspective professionale.rnIl VR is a show allowed me to take home photos taken freehand to 1 second! RnConsigliatissimo! sent on October 18, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Blurred exceptional, creamy and beautiful, very high sharpness already at f2; MAF fast. Cons: Chromatic aberration at room temperature, in a bit soft f1, 8. Opinion: After trying the version f1, 8 D, which I was not fully convinced because of the bokeh a little too hard, I opted for the new version G: I was literally speechless! I had never seen one so creamy bokeh! Really outstanding, similar to that of the big brother f1, 4. Very high sharpness suffers a bit of CA wide open but correctable in post. A tad soft f1, f2 closing at 8 but is already looking sharp and contrasted. Highly recommended for those who need a view from portrait and does not want to spend a fortune. Worth much more than it costs. sent on September 16, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR Pros: Quality / price, lightness, sharpness, resistance to flare. Cons: Very pronounced vignetting at 24mm Opinion: Before writing this review, I tested this lens in the most varied situations of use, from landscape to reportage, portraits with a single lens wedding. Well, I've never been disappointed! I compared the image quality and sharpness with the 24-120mm f4 ... I can safely say that if it was a fixed f4 would be the perfect lens. It has nothing to envy to the 24-120 is even better in detail and in focus. I highly recommend it to those looking for an excellent standard zoom lens that combines a good excursion to image quality quite good. The only drawback: the rather obvious vignetting at 24mm, but with a slight post intervention in the problem can be easily removed. sent on August 13, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
