|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Federico Barbieri www.juzaphoto.com/p/FedericoBarbieri  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Optical quality, price, brightness Cons: Imprecision MAF (at least mine often) Opinion: I just purchased fifty, I got x certainly an excellent quality / price ratio but also because seeing the evidence on the internet to open the average damage better than other older brothers. I find it clear already to 1.8 f / 4 ISO test is comparing it to the best of the 24-70L at 50mm. The focus is noisy and I find sometimes indecisive in focus (it will be normal since it is not USM God forbid), but my problem is something else and I would not be the same as many who consider it too soft at room temperature : I just bought tests focus on the focus chart and I noticed a slight front focus. After several tests on different subjects 8 times out of 10 the wrong mf. Do not know if this is normal considering the price of optics, in any case, I will take him to be checked. On the other hand the problems of front / back focus is around the corner with objectives so bright. sent on April 12, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Sharpness, color rendition Cons: build quality, no hood, high price Opinion: At the end of reading the dozens of threads nausea and evidence of this in mind, I decided to buy used, as the price of the new is very high and not justified. My rating is 8/10, I have to say that I have given more weight to the quality of the lens with respect to the construction quality. The sharpness and surrender I like very much, but the build quality is far from the set L. At the price you pay could do it in metal instead of plastic! sent on January 09, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
