|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rossostarter www.juzaphoto.com/p/Rossostarter  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 20mm f/3.5 Ai-S Pros: Small lightweight filters 52mm Cons: Little or mull Opinion: A lens of character, so to speak... The older brother should have a more homogeneous yield, especially at the edges... but several specimens have an aging of the adhesive of the rear doublet... so I prefer the f3.5... maximum yield at f11 pee where it is useless to refer to the useless mtf tests published at f8 And for the infinite yield, pay attention to the adapter rings because not all of them focus to infinity perfectly, I had to take the bumps sent on March 07, 2024 |
 | Kiron Kino Precision 28mm f/2 MC Pros: F2, Cons: General Quality, Mechanics Opinion: Although it is certainly an intriguing lens, the results are below expectations especially after seeing the tests of the 80s that praised its performance both for the average low contrast especially at the edges. The blades of the diaphragm were mixed with oil, slowing down their movement even when new, giving incorrect exposures Frankly, we do not recommend buying them unless they pull it behind you for about 30 euros sent on December 17, 2023 |
 | Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Nothing... or yes come on... stabilization if you are without alternatives and nn you have better Cons: All... Opinion: Ugly cumbersome sharpness to say the least embarrassing I hope that the designer is not a samurai otherwise his honor will impose drastic choices ... It's one of the scarcest goals I've ever had... In comparison, a 30-year-old panagor, is a masterpiece of optics... Why so much bewilderment? Because it is a lens with a quality that could be expected in the 80s not now I swear I have a zoom of the cimko that in comparison is a masterpiece of optics and in addition is 3.5-4.5 ... obvious nn is autofocus but so much nn use the sony on the A7 but pentax and contax manuals Ultimately vote 1 sent on August 25, 2023 |
 | Olympus PEN-F Pros: All Cons: Nothing Opinion: Fantastic and beautiful car. They are right to say that it is addictive. You get used to it so much that you overlook so many small things that would have been improved such as the magnification of the viewfinder. Why nn do it like that of the panasonic g9? (But why then is it mania to make real keyholes?) Or the interspersed photos that stop at a maximum of 10... The 20 megapixels are enough and advance and the depth of field of the micro 4/3 also the quality of the optics is such as to be able to use them at t.a. The stabilizer is phenomenal, I used the 75 s 1/8 freehand and to try again with the optical aim... The 75-300 one of the most fun in my possession the small and extraordinary fixed optics. Grade 10 laude sent on January 19, 2022 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: FF, possibility to use all the old lightweight optics Cons: Everything else Opinion: Bought in my " creative moment ", (you know those who come so spontaneously to meet your expectations without succeeding) I soon regretted. If you buy it used cheaply to mount the old glories in your possession, ok... After playing with it a bit with the old optics in possession, stove. Then you start shooting with the zoom provided and you get an accident once you see the shot in play ... Even an old cimko of 40 years ago is sharper I see it so small and I say ok I mount its and I carry it with me ... In the end I thank you for nn having sold the pen f and the Sony I use it only to play my old negatives with the 90 macro sigma. finished doing that I resell it .... Rating from 5 to 6 sent on January 19, 2022 |
 | Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 Adaptall-2 Pros: Good sharpness especially in the center Cons: Hood with 82mm filter holder thread screen prints on the barrel more delicate than the previous model Opinion: Given that I have the "new" model, the one without built-in filters ... Although it is rumored that the optical scheme is the same, the quality nn reflects the semi-dysastrous tests of Photographing of the older brother ... The sharpness is also excellent on the Sony a7 the focal length is 17mm and only the extreme edges are less performing ... sent on December 02, 2021 |
 | Pentax SMC 50mm f/1.2 Pros: Optical quality also at t.a. the proverbial construction and pentax robustness of the past Cons: Nothing Opinion: Used for years the k version, often and willingly full aperture for astronomical photography on the occasion of the passage of comets in 1996/97 (yakoutake and hale bopp), ideal for those looking for fabulous blurs etc. The quality is better than many other brands more noble It goes without saying that it should be used on a body with a slide equipped with microprisms and / or stigmometer otherwise on a body that is devoid of it in added to the ridiculous magnification of which the autofocus are equipped the m a f will be, if not a delirium, very annoying sent on December 02, 2021 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 16-45mm f/4 ED AL Pros: Great yield to be a zoom Cons: Nothing Opinion: Some project choices are unsinkable, but if the choice of an unusual focal excursion coupled with an unusual sizing guarantees me excellent results as in this case, welcome. A comment on indoor focus... I've had disastrous results with both tamron and sigma in most cases, so their IF can keep it sent on March 22, 2021 |
 | Panasonic GX8 Pros: Viewfinder Cons: Insufficient stabilization of ergonomics, battery Opinion: I bought the car in kit with its 14-42, I have to say all in all discreet. I had bought it enticeded by the magnification of the viewfinder (apart from a couple of mirrorless digitals usually have lock holes instead of crosshairs, and if you do not know what is a viewfinder as you have to approach the eye to that of an Mx or Me super and you will notice) It will be that I am used to the pen f, where everything is put in the right place, but with the gx8 with its questionable ergonomics any maneuver became really annoying, even the shutter button on that handle nor meat or fish ... And to think that it was one of the things that attracted me the most... Stabilization was really the sore point, not even comparable to that of the pen f (and after all it is so since the pen is stabilized on 5 axes) and made any lens a small toilet, in short, either you snapped at least 1/500 or they were disasters, it was saved only by pairing it at 12-60 panaleic and also activating the stabilization of the objective. To make a stop with the pen f I can safely shoot at 1/8" with 75mm and have a perfect image without moving,( verified on optical aim eh)L I used a couple of months to reproduce gods and negatives then I gave it away to the first offer with less than 1000 shots to get out of there. The only thing liked was the large image and the tipper viewfinder. sent on March 21, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II Pros: Lightness optical quality mannegevolezza practicality compactness... Cons: Nothing Opinion: Bought used at 300€ was a pleasant surprise. Is it right that nowadays, from an optical point of view, the maximum is demanded and sometimes exaggerated expectations are placed on it, not very bright? Brighter assumes larger lenses consequently greater weight higher cost optical correction different use of rare earths in glass.. It is more than evident how much the 300mm f4 costs... Quality weight results and price in proportion, same speech at 75... Lower quality at 300? Same as above, quality costs money. After all, those who want to perform at Ferrari cannot demand them from a panda. As far as it costs it gives so much species up to 150/200mm at 300mm is more than honest, and the quality exceeds some 300 analog fixeds I have, especially in the case of CA. (I also tried it in astronomical photography at 300, to photograph stellar fields and nebulae is more than fine, you have no idea perhaps how glass bottoms are highlighted in astronomical photography) For what it costs 10 full. sent on March 20, 2021 |
 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 Macro Pros: Excellent microcontrast and durability manageability Robustness Cons: Pity you stopped at the report 1:2 Opinion: I've had a couple in the past but stupidly given away to leave place to the original medium canvases it seems that the earliest specimens are optically better (rumors that turned in mid-years 80) despite that compared with the competition (Vivitar 90mm F2, 5 Series 1 macro and Vivitar 90 F2,8) in the MTF tests of PF has been ranked second (a little less corrected in the T.A. F2 Red band,7 Real, and a couple of other small things) I much prefer the Tamron sent on December 06, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
