|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luke88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Luke88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: Focal range, stabilizer Cons: Image quality low, blunt, non-illuminated, AC, not too balanced, lens hood not included Opinion: I have had several occasions to try this super zoom because, going on vacation with a friend who owns it, I wanted to evaluate its performance in different situations scatto.rnIniziamo to say that the only advantage I found in use is the range focal length: have a perspective that goes from 18 to 200 in just is like a blast from the past the compact! I think it can be defined very general perspective for those who have no particular interest (not a true wide nor a true tele) for people who are out to photograph without a subject, and without wanting to bring with you to change lenses. At the end I can say that the image quality is decent from f / 8 to f/11, for a superzoom was not expecting much altro.rnIn conclusion the only reason why I could never use is to have a view with which do site inspections and ideas of photographs from then revise and redo with best optical performance and more! sent on December 29, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Sharpness, range of focal lengths interesting reportage (16-35 on FF), the possibility of using filters, light Cons: Price and hood not included Opinion: When I started photography as a hobby I bought a Sigma 10-20 that I sold after less than a year since I soddisfava as surrender. After a good year without a true wide-angle felt, at some reports on commission, the need for a perspective that went under 17 mm. my Canon 17-55.rnLa first idea was to turn to brands like Tamron and Tokina because of the price, maybe a bit 'high, the Canon 10-22, at the end, following one occasion, I was able to buy me this lens. Immediately left me amazed at the incredible lightness that allows you to take it with you without too much trouble. How evidenzaino other, I agree with the assertion that this lens presents excellent images f/8-f/16 then decline a little '(also because of diffraction) to smaller apertures. The interesting thing is that the TA is still usable as long as you do not have to make prints 2 x 3 meters! My opinion is that it is an excellent choice, very useful for those who like the wide screen without having to necessarily throw on a FF. sent on December 29, 2012 |
 | Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM Pros: AF system, excursion Focal, stabilizer, price Cons: Weight, sharpness at room temperature Opinion: The Sigma 120-400 was my first big lens, I bought a used two years ago and with this view I approached the sports and nature photography. I was able to exploit it in various outdoor events and in the presence of good light is good to close the aperture to f / 8 to gain sharpness, also thanks to the stabilizer can use his free hand. Do not recommend to take the Sit for a whole day or at the end of the neck and shoulders scricchioleranno! The focus is then another of his strength, the ultrasonic system allows you to fit the subject well, even if it moves quickly (es.auto racing). Also in sport is the most useful focal range so as to frame the subject at its best! In the natural I was companion for several shots, and unfortunately, I have complained several times a poor quality TA, especially if accompanied by grazing light that does not illuminate the subject in full! For the record, reporting that after 6-7 months of use I started to notice a lack of focus (front-focus to be precise) which manifested itself first at low mm. (120-200 approximately) and then become intollerabie the maximum excursion (400mm.) from there I took it to the Service from Sigma (Milan) and have settled within twenty days. Since then, the quality, in my opinion, it is a bit 'down, but maybe it was just my idea! I sold it only because I preferred him to the 400L in the lighter, with a MAF instant accompany as silent and a top. sent on April 11, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness at room temperature, stabilizer, autofocus fast-accurate-quiet building, bright Cons: Price, weight, missing hood, range focal Opinion: I bought it after selling 17-85 with which I could not find the right feeling. At the time, the hypothesis valutavo 15-85, as the range of focal lengths, it seemed closer to the previous purchase, then interjected a friend who made me feel the tokina 16-50 f/2.8 making me fall vittama brightness 2.8. At this point, having regard to the price difference is not excessive between the Canon 15-85 and 17-55 for the second inclined preferring the focal range of the brightness factor. Since then I have spent 6 months in which I could test the lens on many occasions: parties both indoors and outdoors, Christmas, theater, wineries wineries, etc. ... Thanks to the combination autofocus precise, opening 2.8, and stabilizer, I was able to shoot even in situations of very low light without the aid of flash obtaining sharp images without blur and with times of 1/5s. to 55 mm. Personally I would not trade with any lens and even though the cost is high and worth every euro spent, if one day I were to sell it, but not much since we lose the good market secondario.rnAltro interesting factor: in my moI found the good resistance to flare (despite what you read), and to date no speck of dust (visible to the naked eye) has ever penetrated into it (and you can not say that the cellars or the clay courts are exempt from the dust factor). I lucky? The new models are a little 'better? To these questions I can not answer your question, but enriches the value of the telescope itself to me! Rnrn sent on March 15, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Pros: Compact, lightweight, stabilized, range of focal lengths, "macro" Cons: Dark, blurry at 250, solidity (it's hard plastic!) Opinion: I got with the camera and 18-55 and at the beginning I considered the perfect in terms of focal lengths. For a year and a half later it is still in my bag, and in relation to the price, I would consider the best telephoto on the market until the exit of the second version. The stabilization is his strong point, allowed me to use it in low light situations with excellent results. Another point in its favor is the range of focal lengths that the smaller size is played in a 88-400! Great if you want to run for city or country without the hassle of trasporatre kg of telephoto lenses! Another nice scopreta this telephoto is the ability to exploit it for images "macro" such as leaves, plants, flowers, fungi and animals onlookers with its ratio to 1:3 and a distance of more than 250 MAF @ 1 meter. Among the flaws is definitely the fact that it is a 2.8 then it expresses the best to f/5.6-f/8 with focal lengths of 55-150 and f / 8 to f / 9 rising above 150mm. Finally, a maximum draft of f / 8 is the minimum requirement in order to give the sensor an image that is quite defined. Overall it's a zoom that I suggest to anyone wishing to buy multi-purpose trails and a view whose priority is dictated by the size and weight, as well as from the portfolio. sent on October 18, 2011 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: Range of Focal, Focus fast, stable, solid Cons: sharpness, vignetting, AC, dark Opinion: I bought it as a substitute for plasticotto obtained when you purchased the SLR. The first impression was very positive, was much more solid 18-55 with the flying metal and heavier than what I was accustomed. The focus was the second surprise, much faster than the starter kit but in low light conditions hobbled in engaging the subject. The range of focal lengths on the other hand is a point in its favor, equivalent to a 27-136, it adapts to many situations. On the other hand is quite dark and to get photos with good sharpness you have to close one or two stop until f/7-f/8, making it poorly suited to theaters, not illuminatissime homes, gyms and the like. Another shortcoming was the presence of AB at room temperature, especially at shorter focal, which made him unfit to resume strong contrsti color. Overall, like Sarah, I would not recommend it because it is useful for photographers who want a multipurpose lens without the need for special sharpness or quality. sent on October 18, 2011 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Excellent value for money, the initial endowment with bag and lens hood, nuts resistant, minimum distortion, flare resistance Cons: Sharpness contained, not very fast AF motor Opinion: was my first lens, maybe not perfect, I took him in and found him an offer enough solid content for both size and weight. The sharpness is not the best: like the center with the Canon or the Sigma 8-16 decade while the edges. F/11 to perform well in landscapes, especially if wide-ranging but requires a minimum of work in PP following the shooting. Clicking backlight shows a good resistance to flare and a more than acceptable color fidelity. Overall I would consider it a good lens for the neophyte of the landscapes in which training and approach to this area of ??the photograph without major economic efforts. sent on September 24, 2011 |
 | Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Very sharp at RT, interesting for portraiture "hard" and not use Macro, MAF very fast, bright lens Cons: 1:1 ratio to only 9 cm Opinion: The lens I bought because I needed a macro for flowers, pinate, diverse flora and with this lens I found the ideal solution to the problem. Then thanks to the light and the detail I used it for a few portraits with good results a few clicks in the cellars of wineries and theater. Paid as a result of a friend, I witnessed good results also for still-life and food. For macro animals and insects recommend instead optics longer as 10 cm. working distance is insufficient. sent on September 24, 2011 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: Ability to shoot in RAW or JPEG, 18.0 Megapixel, excellent quality / price ratio, the sensor used dlla 7D, high degree of customization, excellent video; Cons: ISO sensitivity can only be used up to 800 (max. 1600 but then work with incisive PP), the same adjustment to a stop and not of 1/3, maximum burst of three photos; Opinion: For a year I am passionate about photography and I started with the Canon EOS 550D because I believe it an excellent tool for apprendimento.rnL 'I used it on many occasions: hiking, festivals, sporting events, or stalking in nature often succeeding to take at home at least one photo of me his rewards sforzo.rnInfine, another added value is the quality / price ratio, would not hesitate to recommend it to those who want to look out for this wonderful world. sent on July 06, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
