|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nabat18 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nabat18  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Yongnuo YN-568EX II (Canon) Pros: economic, master function, smooth running, powerful Cons: less solid canon of the consideration, noisy, power button. Opinion: Compared to the models canon is very cheap but not lacking in functionality, behaves very well and combined with my Canon 430EX II efficiently play the role of master to 1/4 the price of the canon. of course the economy has a price, the construction is good but not as solid as a canon, it is weather sealed and I find that the power button is really uncomfortable. the only real flaw that just convinces me is the noise in power for the rest I recommend it now! sent on November 17, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: unbeatable service, blurred, versatility of FF. Cons: optical quality excellent build quality is overall very good but not at the level of a professional optical. Opinion: After much meditation I chose 85 as 1.8 mm optical portrait on FF, I already had a 100mm and 50mm 1.8 but found them both unsatisfactory in some respects. If you choose the 85 with awareness is an optical fantastic! Has inherent limitations in its nature, is not particularly crisp up 2.8 and suffers a bit against the light, but if you take note of these limits everything is joy. The focal length is great for moving around the subject without specific limitations due to the conformation of the location, the blur is pleasant even and soft. I do not understand some of the criticisms on the minimum distance of 85cm focus are ideal for the portrait if you try different performance you have to go on another kind of lens! And then the hood bought on the internet also original does not cost that much. The fact to point out that this is not a series L is a trivial assertion, in any case not think you can make a comparison with the 85 L as they are completely different optics which have in common only the focal lengthyou do not believe that for many photographers 85L is necessarily the best choice. In conclusion choose this perspective with awareness and do not feel the defects, but if you look for high resistance to flare, super sharpness to TA, tropicalization and minimum focusing distance of very low look elsewhere. sent on March 21, 2015 |
 | Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro Pros: price, sharpness, versatility, focal length, f good Cons: coating a bit sensitive Opinion: really a fantastic optical quality for the price. was the best choice for an optical dedidata the macro economy. Fairly light (lighter than the new stabilized version) extremely sharp. Compared with other options for approaching the macro that is the Canon 100 2.8 is really best given the presence of a tripod ring, a series of lens hood and 50mm in more that become crucial if photographing dragonflies and butterflies. To be an optical af the macro is very good (on 5D mkII) and thanks to the limiter you can have a perfect shot very quickly. softness in 2.8 makes it suitable for some portrait as long as you are at a suitable distance. only flaw the coating, is always row and stains remain in contact with dew sent on August 27, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: focal width. Cons: value for very low price. chromatic aberrations apparent even with the lens hood, lens hood is not as standard as all economic and canon lenses, the lens extends into the bag. lack of sharpness. AF fast but significantly inaccurate. sharpness never exciting Opinion: Convenient for travel, lightweight and versatile. But the quality is very low, possibly the worst lens Canon released in recent years. Suffers much the backlight, even if the images can be corrected in post production is still a hassle. Makes so much purple fringing that the photos seem taken from a movie to watch with the glasses blue and red ;). Better than the classic pairing 18-55 55-250 more. Suitable only for those entering the world of photography or who does not like change optics. sent on January 03, 2013 |
 | Canon 500D Pros: lightweight, good value for money Cons: slow burst, noise at high ISO Opinion: small and light it is a great travel companion with its heavy optical lightness makes the grip a little comfortable and well balanced. Great for beginners or for those wishing to travel leggero.Usando quality lenses the results are excellent. It ranks well in its price range, the little flaws that we find them only if we compare it to newer machines or high-end. One of the best amateur cameras. sent on December 03, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
