|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
FedericoSacchi www.juzaphoto.com/p/FedericoSacchi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR Pros: Sharpness, aperture construction, autofocus Cons: Nobody Opinion: I bought it now some time ago, I use it on X T1, and I consider it one of the best goals Fujinon. The lens is well built, all in metal, with non-continuous aperture rings, as on 18 55 for example. The autofocus is extremely fast, it can hook both to closed diaphragms such as F8, and even precisely, both to my amazement, with closed diaphragms and a filter nd 10 stop in front. I read reviews where you write that the lens has enough distortion, which also compares to Samyang 12 F2... The Samyang has distortions that looks like a fisheye, and is a lens that I own and use, but there is no comparison: the 16mm f1.4 of the Fuji is famous, as well as for the optics, currently among the best in Fuji home, also to be an extremely correct wide angle , from the point of view of distortion, absolutely not present... It ' a perfect lens, razor sharp, extremely bright, correct, built fine, tropicalized, has a close focus, about 15 cm, which thanks to the large opening allows, among other things, excellent shots with beautiful blurred. Being a top lens, it also has the focus ring with lock on infinity and on the 15 cm, another sign to be a pro lens. The only drawback, if you can say so, the lens hood that is plastic, albeit very good. I solved by buying a rectangular metal lens hood. Nothing to say, an almost perfect lens, although I use different kits also FF with lenses respectable, this is one of the best ever. sent on September 15, 2018 |
 | Sigma SD Quattro Pros: Cleaning the image at ISO Low, layout of the keys, beautiful to behold, tropicalized, extremely resistant, excellent grip Cons: Pretty poor viewfinder, battery life, operating speed, write speed on SD, given its shape is quite cumbersome Opinion: The first thing to say is: You can only do a few things, it is not a machine suitable for all styles of photography... Let's start with the body: it is very strong, personally I consider it extremely beautiful. The controls are few, but they are the ones that serve, in the right place, extremely essential, but you will not often go on the menu; it is very good, thanks to an extremely deep grip. The files are also too sharp, paradoxically... Full of details, almost infinite dynamic range, JPEG files already excellent in the car, ability to shoot in dng, also has the ability to shoot in SFD mode, the equivalent of an HDR that produces files of even 400mg, flat when they come out of Machine, but that can be postproduced in an exceptional manner. The viewfinder, however, is a sore part: not huge, has a slight lag and, accustomed to viewfinders like that of Fuji XT1, there is no history (it is usable and absolutely functional). Another sore point are the batteries, which arrive at 200 shots to put it big, and cost, unless you take 3e parts. Continuing with the negative points we arrive at speed: horrible. For writing on board you have to give yourself a book to read, and also the operating speed itself is disarming; It should be taken as if it were an old medium format.. If used for landscapes, on easel, from the best of itself... It can be used generally for everything, but it does not do well in situations of fast moving subjects, or where there is no light: over the 100 ISO, in my opinion, should not be used.. Already at 400 ISO you start to ruin the image. By pulling the sums, if used in the presence of good light, basic ISO, or tripod, is sensational, fantastic, has a body in my opinion perfect, and produces absolutely incredible files, at a price all in all content. In my opinion magnificent. sent on July 25, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 R WR Pros: Quality to the touch, WR, made in general, aperture ring Cons: Hood and plug Opinion: I used it before on xt10, now on xt1, thus having all tropicalized .... the lens is tiny but with excellent performance .... clear enough already at f2.0, in the middle, improves closing the diaphragm, like any lens At the touch it is very light but sturdy, all in metal, and the aperture ring that has no infinite travel (like 18 55 or 18 135) is very comfortable and soft, maybe a minimum trope for my taste, but still fantastic .rnEro undecided between 23 and 35, but I found myself better with the equivalent 35mm ...... beautiful lens, very recommended ... could also be the only lens of my kit fuji. Last thing: the hood is quite ridiculous, too small, and the cap can also be put with the hood, but takes off with an impressive ease, which happens even when you put it directly on the lens, this is the only flaw ... sent on January 05, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm X-PRO1 Pros: Aesthetic beauty, viewfinder, generated files and body quality Cons: To date, whoever buys it is because he knows what he's up against, on the contrary, he risks throwing money Opinion: is fantastic ..... bought 2 times, resold one, I will never make this mistake again, I'll keep it to life.rnThe machine itself is beautiful to the eye, and robust to the touch ... the dials are at the right point, the layout of the keys a little less, but you make it a habit.rnEra (and is, now together with the pro2) famous for its hybrid viewfinder, which is great at the beginning to play with it a bit ', and have a little fun even with the lens inside that enlarges the focus but .... it lasts a little ..... has many many negative sides .... you end up early to use the evf, which is not magnificent, but you can understand given the age; remains however more than usable.rnI files: they are beautiful, at high iso you notice a little 'noise, but much less than you read around, and when present, if not very high iso, you have a nice grain, especially in black and white, where he produces excellent files even at higher sensitivities.rnThe speed of macchina is anything but high, but acceptable: it is not made for sports photos, but for street, landscapes ... nothing ultra fast, in short .... the autofocus is quite accurate, lent, but it goes a little in the ball in situations of low contrast or dark.rnNel complex, it is a machine in my opinion magnificent, from all points of view ... but you must know what you buy it for. sent on January 05, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm X-T10 Pros: Sensor, ring, size, fuji optics Cons: not tropicalized Opinion: Bought at not much to 300 euros in excellent condition, I bought it to return to the Fuji world after Xpro1.rn I've paired up with a 23mm f2 WR, great optics.rnThe car looks much more compact than I had imagined .. by placing it next to my em1 with 12 40 pro, it comes out smaller, and even without any targets, the body is even smaller than the olympus, despite the sensory difference.rnI used it mainly for street photos (where I adore it) and landscaping: I find it very good in many ways, the sensor is excellent, the yield to high iso convinces me, the body is lightweight and well constructed .... it's so small that the grip is not the best without handles.rnFra I also put the reclining screen, which is of a monstrous convenience. On the negative side I can not put the tropicalization, in my opinion, a great lack, and also the controls that in some cases are a little tricky to my liking (at least compared to the em1 and the the d750 I use) .rnIn conclusion now that you trova at prices around 300 400 euros in excellent condition, it's a real jewel to catch on, in my opinion ... highly recommended. sent on October 29, 2017 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Quality of files, quality and materials of machine body, functions, keystroke layout and customization, viewfinder, zuiko optics Cons: I must say that it is the first time that I find myself in the fight but not find them, honestly Opinion: I bought the EM1 shortly after the release of the mark II, at a more than good price, and with 0 shots. The car body looks beautiful and extremely robust, tropicalized very well (it has taken a lot of water), the stylus of the keys is excellent: you have everything, but just everything, at your fingertips, the menu opens it once and then never again. It has several more intuitive internal functions, such as live composite, with 5-axis stabilization that is extremely functional. The handle is great, even for hands as large as mys, with the addition of bg or just the bracket Optional "L" becomes perfect. The quality of the files is superb, even for medium prints with its 16mpixel is more than enough. Using a 12 40 f2.8, and more and more often leaving my d750 at home, not only because of the remarkable saving of weight and space due to microscopic zuiko optics but exceptional for quality, but also because, at the end of the fair, ninthbecause of the difference between the two sensors (ff is double the m43), the result of the small omd is amazing. Also advised by professionals, and now that it is at low prices, it is worth investing us some money because, I repeat, it is a exceptional machine at all points of view. sent on October 03, 2017 |
 | Nikon 1 V2 Pros: Speed, lightness and the ability to mount bayonet optics f through adapter Cons: 1 "sensor, uncomfortable commands in my opinion, nikkor 1 penious targets, sold at ridiculous prices and poor quality, among other things Opinion: I bought it with a zoom lens kit taken and put on one hand, used with adapter to mount a good telezoom, it was the only reason I bought it, since I had read of a speed nothing bad. I was pleasantly impressed with the files despite the ridiculous 1 "sensor. rnNon I liked the layout of the commands (it's true I'm used to a D750 and an omd em1 that have the perfect commands, especially the olympus), but I'm too I have not had the chance to try it out for a while, for the little I've been able to test it, I can say that it is very well constructed and aesthetically I like it very much, even though May may be considered an abortion, but these are tastes. "The thing I adore in part is the adapter: mount my 70 200 2.8 tammy having the equivalent of a 190 540 2.8 .... amazing .... the focus is good and enough fast, but I must say that in some situations of low contrast and / or little light makes chaff; for the cosand the negative regarding the coupling with the official adapter is that with my multiplier kenko 1.4 300 pro you lose the automatic maf, and even worse is that the power take-off is on the machine and consequently on the adapter, making it impossible the mechanical dragging of the lenses on afd optics, which can only be used with manual maf ... a great shame.rn I should say that all in all I was impressed by this machine, also because in the world of used any As a comparison term I have spent 390 euros for a 1v2 with a few clicks (about 4000), original nikon adapter, and the base lens 10 30mm vr (penoso), a kit lens kit 18 55 vr and the ' nikon wireless adapter + shipping. sent on October 03, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi EVO Pros: Exceptionally small and practical, inexpensive but of good quality Cons: for the typology, but if you pretend the quality of a chip on a 20 cm stand obviously you fall bad Opinion: I bought for a few tens of euros, I used it with olympus kit, and even nikon, putting on a d750 with bg and 70 200 or tokina 16 28, so it holds more than good .... on one occasion I also placed d750 with a very heavy catadriatic 1000, so I would say it was great for the size of the tripod. It obviously meant that to avoid the move it was used remote control or some kind of self-timer, such as self-timer etc. etc., that was a discovery, I always carry it behind in journeys that go out where I want less space; I highly recommend it, I am now a couple of years old and have not bothered it.rnAccurate sent on September 25, 2017 |
 | Tair-11A 135mm f/2.8 Pros: Sharpness, blurry, construction, ring, continuous scroll of diaphragm nut, diaphragm 20 slats Cons: those who can have lenses of '55, having 20 slides of the diaphragm must be careful not to break the pins Opinion: Bought used, left me for the sake. First of all it is a 2.8, which was remarkable for the times .... it is very clear even at the maximum opening, closing improves. The focus is very precise, the ring is extremely fluid, allowing you to photograph with extreme pleasure, and is built entirely of metal, robust ... the bokeh is remarkable, also thanks to the fact that it is a lens with 20 lamellas, an extremely high number, which guarantees a very blurry, pleasing and soft.rnIt needs to be mentioned: the fact of the 20 lamellas is a pro on the one hand, but one on the other .. you must be careful to rotate the diaphragm ring and make it gently, otherwise you risk breaking the pins who keep the blades in place, I happened to see 4 or 5 blades out of the seat and have a nice egg bokeh as well as spend 40 euros to fix it. For this great lens on all fronts, obviously just used, at a mo price desto, having an exceptional rendition.rnHave also the ringof sliding diaphragms, very comfortable.rn an excellent purchase. sent on September 12, 2017 |
 | Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-IF ED Pros: Construction, lens quality, integrated lintel Cons: Slow age, age Opinion: Bought at 390 euros in excellent condition, it is a lens with excellent design quality: all in metal, very heavy. It has a very narrow optical array, but it has EDs lenses in it.rnThough crisp and extremely hot and warm colors, it still feels the weight of the years when coupled with many pixel sensors, although it remains an exceptional lens if compared to the cost With which it is in the world of the used. It's all too cumbersome for the focal type. It is decently clear at full opening, from f5. 6 very sharp, has a magnificent bokeh typical of the nikon afd series. For those who want to spend a little and have a good 300mm without the pretense of having a samsung but afs series, this is the lens that works for him, obviously if used with AF-powered louvers. Great in many ways, in my opinion, the best of myself with bodies that do not exceed 24 megapixels sent on August 23, 2017 |
| Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-IF ED Pros: Construction, lens quality, integrated lintel Cons: Slow age, age Opinion: Bought at 390 euros in excellent condition, it is a lens with excellent design quality: all in metal, very heavy. It has a very narrow optical array, but it has EDs lenses in it.rnThough crisp and extremely hot and warm colors, it still feels the weight of the years when coupled with many pixel sensors, although it remains an exceptional lens if compared to the cost With which it is in the world of the used. It's all too cumbersome for the focal type. It is decently clear at full opening, from f5. 6 very sharp, has a magnificent bokeh typical of the afd nikon series. For those who want to spend a little and have a good 300mm without the pretense of having a samsung but afs series, this is the lens that makes for him, obviously if used with AF-powered louvers. Great in many ways, in my opinion, the best of myself with bodies that do not exceed 24 megapixels sent on August 23, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, overall yield Cons: hood inconvenient when screwed on the contrary Opinion: Bought from shortly after trying various sigma similar, and several such nikon 80 200 2.8 to pump and True Union, and tamron same model but not stabilized; Well, nssuno manning the comparison, nemeno remotely disarming clarity, already at TA, lifelike colors, stabilizer that allowed me to also take 1/20 in lengths 180 and 200, against eccellente.rnDi really honestly I noticed a little .. .si can say the weight, but who buys it knows which lens is, and that therefore could not be diversamente.rnHo found also excellent for the tripod ring, excellent construction, all metal of course, like the rest of the 'goal stesso.rnLa rendering is excellent at all focal lengths and maximum aperture of F4 ... become perfect, it decreases the focal maximum, but only slightly, and even there, to 2.8 is fine, at F6.3 perfetto.rnUn'ottica the great price when you consider that it costs half of a Nikon, and that made it really, really, eccezionale.voto 10, recommended assolutamente.rnUltima thing, I SentTo around to say that, compared with sigma, for example, è more resolving, but is guilty of af .... I honestly have noticed an AF always very fast, and extremely quiet (vr the other hand a little noise does), and a disarming clarity. sent on April 09, 2017 |
 | Nikon D5100 Pros: Tenuta iso, grip, swing and resolute display Cons: lack af internal motor, viewfinder 95% (but on this class of machines is standard) Opinion: It has been my first SLR, churns out excellent file, and I have to say that maintains a eccezionae quality even at high ISO ... now I have a ff kit, but covering old shots was impressed with the seal, also a past iso 3200. It has a good balance sensor / num. pixel, has the swiveling display which, although not indispensable, when there is very comodo.rnL'unico neo is, for me, the lack of motor af dentroma you know, on the entry level is a standard, such as the viewfinder to 95% .rnRimane a machine that, in its class, although now has several years behind him, he is really good .... the d7000 sensor, then a large sensore.rnPer those who want to get started, find used recently is a game child sent on April 04, 2017 |
 | Nikon 105mm f/2.8 AF Micro Pros: Sharpness, availability, price Cons: af slowness, lack stabilizer Opinion: Bought used, it is still a good target ... the construction is excellent, all metal, and also feels the weight, the dimensions are reduced, the sharpness is excellent, even at full aperture ... has a ratio of 1: 1, but he does not have the stabilizer ... if you use it only for macro photos, this is not a problem, but if like me you use it also for high-contrast, detailed portraits, could make comfortable; as the last thing the maf: extremely slow (like all macro), fairly accurate, though sometimes cane, to infinity is not to be used; convenient focus limiter to fuoco.rné good lens that is located around 300 euro nell'usato.Mi feel absolutely to advise sent on March 12, 2017 |
 | Zeiss Jena Triotar 135mm f/4 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh and price Cons: The cons that can have a lens that is a triplet of more than 30 years ago Opinion: Bought used for a while, I use it on reflex nikon full frame. It has good sharpness and bokeh is by far my favorite of all the lenses I have tried, along with that of the brother f2.8.rnLa 50mm lens is a triplet, with T..non treat expect a comparable anti-reflective coating modern ones, belonging to this I think is a great lens for the price that ... Really nice and good results. The only one against it is that using it on Nikon SLR will lose in any case the focus to infinity, even when used with an adapter corrective lens (I use hama), the maf to infinity will be impossible rn sent on March 01, 2017 |
 | Samsung NX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS Pros: Sharpness and construction Cons: A bit 'dark like all 18 of 55 kits Opinion: It is a kit optical, but does not show it. Used on NX300, always sharp, with vibrant colors. Stabilizer very good and extremely quiet, the lens also has a button dedicated to advanced functions, which can be comfortable. It's a great lens. A price maybe a little 'too high if not bought in kit, but has a high quality of construction, and more circuits of a normal lens inside. The focus is precise speed, silent. Recommended sent on December 06, 2016 |
 | Samsung NX 30mm f/2 Pros: Sharpness, compact Cons: He does not distance maf Opinion: Used on NX300 it is small, but although it may seem like a toy, it is very well built, the low number of lenses inside means that produces razor-sharp images, even at f2. Closing becomes crystal clear. The bokeh is not canvases, but good enough to have 7 strips and be a standard lens. The focus is fast and accurate. It is also quiet, at least my model. It has an insane price, and gives satisfaction. Highly recommended sent on December 06, 2016 |
 | Samsung NX300 Pros: image quality, price, size, aesthetics, AF Cons: no viewfinder Opinion: The now bought a few years ago in England, l I then resold through a ff systems mirrorless Nikon and Olympus. It gave me great satisfaction .. Although it was designed more for a consumer audience "point and shoot", had a sensor far superior to my SLR era (d5100). The night photograph was a show, held very well the high ISO, even using the lens 18-55 ois, the images were very sharp, rich detail and vibrant colors. Extremely compact with pancakes goals, also had an exceptional screen; It was extremely beautiful to the eye, ending the AF .. never seen an auto-focus so fast and precise, even in full darkness instantly hooked. Now the bad points ... has not the viewfinder, the main reason why I gave it away, push bar is not good, but ... The controls .. Well, there are very few .. Forget double ring and dedicated keys : there are practically no ... navigation on the menu is quite fast and intuitive, but not comparable to that of a kingflex or mirrorless as omd or fuji. Ultimately rnih, it is a fantastic camera, with a lens kit that is really good. Now out of production, it is really ridiculous prices, but, unless you want absolutely the viewfinder and many custom commands with dedicated keys, give you beautiful images, in a beautiful body and extremely comfortable .... Also very connected, being equipped wi fi. highly recommended sent on December 06, 2016 |
 | Nikon D200 Pros: Body control, CCD sensor, viewfinder, battery Cons: Age Opinion: I bought this body about a year and a half ago, with just 4000 shots. It has a pro body, like the d700, and it is just fantastic. The controls are all at your fingertips, you ca the menu only once .... It has a MAF afd objectives with extremely fast and precise. Obviously has a certain age, then travel at high ISO is not advisable .... We say that the 800 you can reach, in some situation even 1250, if you are printing a very large photos. Despite everything, however, even at the end of 2016 it remains a body that much use, in black and white is fantastic, and also for portraiture is outstanding. Although I have a d750, often I have fun even with the 200 ... if you take it to below 200 Euros, the highly recommend sent on November 27, 2016 |
 | Sigma 19mm f/2.8 DN Pros: Sharpness, MAF, quality / price ratio Cons: Nobody Opinion: I bought qiesta lens about a year ago, and the use of omd EM10 II. Has an exceptional value for money, as the whole series art 60mm and 30mm for m43 ... The sharpness is maximum already at TA, we were stunned, closing improves everything, including some chromatic aberration that occurs at RT. The MAF is fast, and especially the minimum distance is incredible. The only flaw, personally, is the focus ring, smooth, I do not like. Apart from this is an exceptional lens, equivalent to 38mm on a micro four also terzi.Ho the 60mm qiesta series, and even those is exceptional, with a sharpness comparable al75mm ZUIKO. highly Recommended sent on November 25, 2016 |
 | Tokina RMC 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Good sharpness, good construction, size Cons: Little to the price at which it is located Opinion: Found used a few tens of euro, flush to the new conditions, it has a great building, with aperture rings and extremely soft focus and comode.rnHa a remarkable sharpness, inaspettata.Lo use on Nikon ff, has colors similar to the Nikon D series , although I have to say that I notice a loss of sharpness when used at infinity focus, even if you do suffer my unità.rnAlla ultimately a good lens for a pittance, so recommended. sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 AF Pros: compared to the price performance Cons: Nobody Opinion: Bought the model 50 1.8 AF (not D) used at 80 euro .... eccezionale.rnPer is simply the price you have a lens from the construction it is plasticky, but in the end it is well assembled, and has exceptional sharpness, being a 50mm, and then being a simple to build focal, and also inexpensive to make, it has a very much sharper lens after f4, very bright if necessary (even though soft to TA) and extremely versatile. You can do the portrait set (especially on APSC) to panorami.rnUna consigliatissima lens, because at a ridiculous price goes a very very good glass at home, which gives very sharp images if diaphragm just closed, pastellosi acceptable colors and bokeh. rnRapporto quality / price best I ever for any existing lens currently in the world sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.8 D Pros: Sharpness, price of used, sizes Cons: Unremarkable, perhaps uncomfortable method to insert the lens hood, or screwing rn Opinion: Bought used in very good condition, at a more than reasonable price for the type of lens and the reputation that segue.rnLa construction is good, and also looks good; as regards the yield, it has good sharpness, but not in TA, which may be an advantage, rather than a defect, for a lens designed for the portrait; stopping down increases the sharpness still in a esponenziale.rnGrazie at 9 aperture blades, generates a nice bokeh, rather delicate .... the colors are the classic pastellosi, and not typical of G lenses brilliant, can like it or not, but for portraits, in my opinion, have an effect very migliore.rnUna recommended lens, also for the very good construction, and the fact that in used now you can also find more than good prices, taking home an excellent lens , and also compatta.rnConsigliato sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness, size and price Cons: Anything Opinion: Bought new on the internet recently, the use of OM D EM10 II.rnObiettivo very small, I have a ff Nikon kit, where I use a 85mm 1.8D ... to think about having a large 1/5 lens but essentially the same makes me smile .. ..without count that 45 ZUIKO is better than Nikon ..... Sharpness sensational, if closed a bit '(or even too much), has a nice bokeh, AF speed is very very buona..preciso and nothing rumoroso.rnRestituisce detailed images with blurred pleasant and brillanti.rnSe color you want less sharpness, for example portraits, leaving at f1.8 and acting a bit 'in pp you risolve.rnConsigliatissimo, quality / price ratio very high sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Olympus 9mm f/8 Fish-Eye Body Cap Pros: Fun, good photos can come out after all Cons: Plasticky, fixed f8, but then is a coprisensore with a hole Opinion: Thought more like coprisensore that aim, it is an idea after all carina.rnOvviamente seems more a toy than a lens, but if necessary proved decent, to make wide scenes, and photos within città.rnHa much distortion (it's a fish-eye, after all), and it remains to f8 fixed .... the focus is manual, and divided into 3 positions ... one for infinity, a middle distance and one for short distances .... It never used the latter. Percent euro you can even think about taking it sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 24mm f/2.8 D Pros: Sharpness, construction Cons: I found none Opinion: Bought used, but in excellent condition, I wanted a good wide-angle lens with a fixed aperture ... I found it very good, very crisp, very comfortable for what concerns night views, and photos to the Milky Way, is a beautiful lens, turning a little crisp, robust, despite the ridiculous size, weighs parecchio.rnNel used market if they are several, and spending relatively little you can make a deal, being a glass that has nothing to envy to more moderne.rnUnica flaw slow, so if you can say, it is that it can be used, of course, only semi-pro bodies, since it has no AF interno.rnEstremamente recommended sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 Pros: Blurred beautiful, Sharpness, Materials Cons: nobody Opinion: I bought a perfect specimen of this lens by bit .... now is the objective that has the most beautiful I've ever seen ... blurry similar to fuzzy "bubble" Trioplan style; has a surprising nìitidezza, good even at TA, closing sharply rooms ... it returns very accurate colors, but brillanti.Una magnificent lens, at a ridiculous price. sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 Pros: Sharpness, construction Cons: glass front that rotates to focus, poor zoom range Opinion: Bought used for 260 €, in perfect condition, I was able to test it, and I'm very convinced ... It has an excellent performance, even in the focal extremes, though it gives the best in focal between the two extremes. A 2.8 is not a blade, but still returns more good pictures, turning a bit ', it becomes extremely well nitido.rnCostruito, you feel the strength in his hand, and, perhaps because of the lack of zoom range, the pump mechanism does not causes an excessive sliding down the front lens when the device is tilted, typical targets with pompa.rnSe operation can be found at a reasonable price, is consigliato.rnPer regard to opacification problems, I came across in 2 units this goal, and one I bought it, and neither of them seemed to be the problem of opacification. sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Pros: Sharpness, size and weight, price Cons: Ring MF smooth for me uncomfortable; lens not really that great Opinion: Goal that is unrivaled for quality / price ratio, I made a comparison between this and the Zuiko 75mm 1.8 and ... well, you could not see big differences to the same openings, something that left me stunned. Obviously it is not made out of metal, and does not have great finishes, but as for glasses, is exceptional: crystal clear, even at room temperature, gives good images, absolutely great for a lens that costs less than 200 Euros. Absolutely recommended. sent on November 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED IF Pros: Sharpness, robustness, speed ' Cons: You can prevent dust since it is not 'present no glass behind the diaphragm Opinion: And 'an exceptional lens, which has a sharpening portentosa.rnEssendo 2.8 and' extremely fast as glass; nothing to say, spolo the fact that the absence of the posterior lens may enter the dust if you make numerous changes of target, as regards the quality 'of the images it produces, and the construction, are at the top. sent on May 27, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
