|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Enricomazz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Enricomazz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto BeFree Advanced (Leva) Pros: Stable, excellent head, legs with lever Cons: 1, 6kg (lever version) make it really a transportable tripod in trips?? The head has a plate compatible with ARCA, but only accepts plate Manfrotto, so it essentially does not change much from the standard hook plate head does not convince me, it does not always snaps, and you have to give us an eye before you let go of the car Opinion: I bought it to replace a dorr that had it by its a featherweight, but unfortunately the head was not adequate for my D610, with the price of a decent head I bought a super stable tripod for any need! It's fine in my mountain backpack and has a I would say granitic head, it manages to support a 70-200 2.8 Tamron even without the use of the tripod ring! I bought it especially for carefree use during the trips, but we say that it makes you feel a lot, and this is not that I like it too much! Surely for my hiking in the mountains, and night I would not use anything else, but I have to be careful not to bring too many lenses with me otherwise the weight of the backpack is felt, and too... Doing a moment the accounts a Nikon D610 + 24-70 weigh approximately 1.5 kg adding the tripod we are at 3kg, so you already have a backpack that you feel, after you just add 2 or 3 more things and you find a weight on your shoulders not indifferent! Ultimately the tripod is super recommended if you don't have any weight problems, and if you prefer a stable and granite tripod for your optics, if you need a small, stable tripod, go on the Rollei compact in carbon you'll spend less and you'll have a Anyway Super product! sent on February 18, 2019 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Price in relation to focal length and brightness, sharpness and solidity Cons: no possibility of using filters, quite cumbersome given the fixed lens hood Opinion: Objective challenging given the focal length, I have used it at 200 euros, and I think it is an appropriate price, the lack of autofocus is not heard for 2 reasons, 1) often presents the whole frame in focus also thanks to the use of hyperfocal, 2) is one of those focal points not pointed and snaps, or to steal some shots in the street, is a focal to be used for alpi spaces, then inevitably need to think about shooting, the composition, and therefore the fact that both manual focus does not give problems! It has a definition that has stunned me, and a corner of the field that you do not expect, can hold up well against the light. As soon as I have the opportunity I'll try this lens for some night photos in the mountains, we'll see that it will come out! Lens suitable for those who are creative with focal lengths of this type (for me it is not really in my ropes, but I wanted to experiment), and those who love to make complex landscape photos, unfortunately the lens requires the use of holders and square filters that cost a figure (sometimes also pmore than the lens itself), thus limiting the possibility of using the lens (for example I would like to shoot with an ND filter ...). That said I keep this lens tight, but I'm throwing an eye to lenses that allow the use of filters like the 20mm 1.8 nikon! Which, although it costs a lot more in my opinion, is a more flexible lens! sent on February 13, 2018 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: cost, is frequently found in the used market, 2.8 constant, vr, lock for zoomatarn Cons: the zoom that makes the lens extend is a kind of vacuum cleaner, at 24mm there is a lot of distortion (it's not too much against), I expected a better performance at backlight, bad latch, exaggerated filter diameter Opinion: I've been using this fantastic zoom for several months, optical quality is amazing, and I feel it is very suitable for street and landscapes photos, in fact more photos from "everyday" and it's its advantage, because it lets you dare with the fantasy. The 70mm I do not like much as they do for portraits, in fact, I always prefer to replace it with my 85mm 1.8 if I can, not so much for the brightness as for the more mms that better off the subject than to distort less. I did several backlight tests with the sun at sunset and made me flare, unfortunately ... I was hoping to resist more or better ... I would have liked to delight a bit with the nd filters but I did not have so big diameters (82mm ), the cost for NDs of those sizes and that they are qualitatively good is about 100 euros ... The weight is not exaggerated, we say that when you see it, you expect a certain weight! The vr is an invasive coat, as soon as it engages the fire the image moves rischianI'm going to determine a move image ... The sharpness on my d610 is at a good level, especially when I close already at f4 and 5.6 gives very thin details ... It's worth spending on 650-700 euros in the market of the used compared to 1500 (at least) of the nikon fee, now, certainly nikon will be better in many respects, but for my use and my experience tamron is more than enough. Conclusion: Excellent handyman for FF, very useful for excursions and trips where you have to limit the gear to the bone. sent on October 16, 2017 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino per fotocamera e accessori Pros: cost, modularity, pockets, silhouette that allows you to put everything Cons: fabric, missing waterproof cloth, very small, and the fact that you try to be ergonomic, but it fails completely Opinion: The backpack is made very well and costs little, but of course there are things that distinguish it from a 100 euro backpack, first it is not very comfortable, its size is that of a backpack and therefore also on the back feels more small of the usual backpacks; Also padding for less on the back is not well studied and not even well done! The hook for the tripod is not great, and always because of the size of the backpack, it often becomes very unbalanced if loaded too much. It does not have rigid areas, but it has only well-padded areas, and if you are well organized, you can make a flash drive and 2 or 3 targets, more cables, and more. Too bad that they did not have a pocket underneath to pull out a waterproof coat, it would have been useful since this is a backpack designed for some simple hike! in conclusion, the backpack is super good for what it costs, but of course it costs little and so it has several defects which obviously on higher band backpacks are not found! sent on October 16, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 G Pros: Small, lightweight, filter diameter, very sharp, great optic especially when coupled to FF, minimal distortions Cons: It does not scratch in scenes with little light you feel the need Opinion: Beautiful optics, inspiring especially to get impatient in street or composite portraits! Lightweight and compact you bring it around, sharp and fairly good! Too bad for the lack of VR that FF does not feel so much, they raise the ISO and beasta, on apsc instead it is harder to use! Quality cost ratio is very good! I sincerely appreciate the plastic construction because it reduces the weight to a few hundred grams and makes it easily transportable in a backpack, always in the church if, like me, made so many mountain hikes! sent on October 06, 2017 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: Weight, size, battery, very well-recoverable files, high ISO hold, buttons available except for ISO Cons: ISO Button poorly positioned and not programmable, no wifi or Bluetooth, very bad AF as soon as the light conditions are not great, AF-C for nothing accurate Opinion: Former possessor of a D3300 I decided to buy my first FX the D610 now 2 years ago, and I think now I have accumulated enough experience to be able to "review"! From passionate about landscape photos, street and portraits (more than portraits are stolen shots at some party, but I also did from "photographer" to some friend graduation) I thought that the full format was the right thing to choose, and after 2 years I do not regret the choice , indeed, I'm super satisfied, but I realize that the D610 is very far from being a great pro (or the ultimate machine), I would call a good entry level of the FX format! Who wants to buy it, especially now that is found by RCE at prices even around 800 euros must definitely consider that the AF is scarce, but really very poor, as soon as the light falls will not be able to focus virtually nothing, forcing you to Go look for some bright area of the frame to get it hooked, the points of MAF are was and distributed so much in the center (let's say that if you focus in the center and recompose you do not care, but I often use the points of MAF instead of recompose , I say it is annoying), the ISO holds them very well (but what does that mean?! They Come out acceptable files with little noise up to 1600-2000 ISO, then you have to know how to act with software for the NR, and at that point are recoverable files even at 6400 ISO if the right conditions of light). Note about the battery, really amazing, I found myself several times with the battery in the middle of the charge at the beginning of a day of photos and it held up fine until the evening, provided not to use the LV. I would buy it again, yes to the selling price that is now! When I took it, at 1100 euros used, by RCE, was a bit ' overrated, at this time rather I would take a D750 that I think is the FX with the best value for money and that manages to fill all those small gaps in the D610! sent on July 17, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Low cost (the used is below 150), diaphragm 1.8; dimensions; Weight, small filters, can also be used on FX Cons: After 2 years of use, even engaging, I can not find them Opinion: It was my first goal, my thought at that time was so little spending so much, and after hours and hours of research on the forum I said I would have used a fixed optic to begin to understand the photographic world! I was undecided until the last of 35mm nikon and 50mm, in the end I bought this for a bid in the used! I did well, I mounted it on the d3300, it seemed to go around with a toy, but it gave me great shots! The lack of the Vr have never felt, with this lens it's all simple, play with diaphragm time and max iso, and you always have a photo properly exposed! I just started with the test, always coming out with only 50mm but I figured it was pretty fit for my way of shooting in 80% of my shots, the remaining 20% ??were landscapes, architecture, street in which This fixed optic created me a few problems because of the aps-c crop factor! By now the 50mm is always in his pocket, he isMy loyal companion, I never keep him home, because you never know! Now in view of the purchase of my first Fx it makes me very comfortable to have in my optics a lens that I can use to the maximum! I recommend it to all the newbies, for those who have money to spend, and know how to appreciate and exploit the quality of lenses, but I would advise you to get interested in the 50mm 1.4 art! sent on June 06, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Cost, sharpness up to 200/250 mm already af / 8, reasonable filter size (62mm), phenomenal VC system, also suitable for FF Cons: VC energivoro, with hood is a sight obscure, bulky; It's not a featherweight (but it's a 70-300), 300 is not perfect, not instantaneous focus (but not too slow), lack of zoom lock, with hood mounted on the contrary it can not zoom Opinion: I claim that I mount it on my d3300 (which without lenses weighs about 400gr), so the lens is unbalanced by the car, is disproportionate to the small size of my entry level! With mounted hood is Gigantic! Beyond the constructive quality (I'm sorry not to have plastic in order to hold 800 grams of weight), I think there are some bad things, such as the absence of the focal block and the fact that with the hood mounted on the contrary it fails to Use the zoom ring, which explains the reason for its not high cost! If you can overcome these defects, you can appreciate the true quality of the lens, ie the lenses and the VC. I optically liked it, F / 8 is sharper than 18-105 (which in my opinion is a qualitatively comparable zoom with this), the VC feels and is noticeable, it is very effective, far superior to the VR of the 18- 105 of nikon, allows to make shots even at 1/30 if not less than 70mm, and at 300mm i have been able to imagWithout micromassage at 1/125 and probably could keep even longer times! Useful for outdoor photos (it's too dark for indoor), I have not tried it yet to use for sports photography, but I have good hopes! I really liked it as it did in the portrait and in the street (yes it's long and you notice, but if well camouflaged it's not being seen by the subject, keeping the naturalness of the moment) sent on May 06, 2017 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM Pros: Focal Range convenient for some street, compact and small solid, f3.5 Cons: Diameter 82mm filters, not very sharp, ta either 10mm or 20mm, hard to use at night, marked distortion at 20mm not to mention the distortion at 10mm Opinion: It was my first wide angle, has a long way disappointed his lack of sharpness, especially in dark scenes ... The nice that (like all wide-angle), the scene must be drafted and the angle and the light go well dosed for the appreciable compositions ! The problem that this objective is the size of the filters, too big and expensive, so even for a filter you have to shell out na beautiful figures (also 70 euro for 1 only of average quality filter) sent on March 31, 2017 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Bright, solid, beautiful, minimal maf distance, quality and brightness of fixed focal lenses without having to change lens! Cons: Focal range maybe too narrow, heavy (but after a while you do not feel anymore), important as size, Opinion: Is my first Sigma Art and I do not think it will be the last seen the satisfaction that is giving me! Nice goal, due to the fact that there is no zoom like this, I did not have any calibration problems, the colors are faithful, the mafia has a good speed! Distorce more than I expected at 18mm, but 35 is perfect !! Great for street or portraits! Every time I mount it on the d3300 i take backpacking also the 50th, because you never know !!! The dimensions are important, we are about the size of the Sigma macro 105, just less !!! Weight is felt, especially if you have an entry level! Concluding the goal I really liked it, only I still need a lot of experience to handle it !! A 1.8 is already very sharp, useful in low light or indoor conditions, closing slightly the diaphragm is perfect! RnAgrication: I used it recently for some party and the possibility of using it with very open diaphragms allowed me toAvoid using the flash (which I do not know how to handle very well), recommended for use in the interior, but in my opinion the portraits and landscapes (even the night) are her daily bread! I have to say that this range of narrow focuses is teaching me a lot, you feel you have to move and manage the scene better to fix the picture, not just a zoom! I highly recommend it to all the aps-c holders, my heart's crying to have to abandon it because of my upcoming move to Fx! sent on March 31, 2017 |
 | Nikon D3300 Pros: Easy to use, simple, lightweight, bright, battery life Cons: Few points of fire, resistance to iso, Opinion: I bought this d3300 as the first personal reflex and I have to say (comparing it to my father's d300) is compact lightweight and essential, in my opinion is a great handy camera to carry around to enjoy learning photography! It certainly does not give the d300's robust feelings but fortunately lost about half! After nearly 2 years of use, I must say that it does not qualitatively desire the most advanced apsc bodies like the d7200, because the sensor is that (there are differences but not so important to justify almost 1000 euros for switching to D7200)! Thanks to this camera I realized that the lenses are essential, but the car body is much less! I think I'll just change it to switch to FX! What starts to stare tight is iso hold (800 is perceived a bit of noise) and the poor precision of maf in dark environments, I think Raw making it is quite workable, but going to FX I would definitely have a lot much more! ConcludingI think it's a very good reflex, far superior to the entry level of canon, I think it's so good that it could reduce purchases of numerous high end Nikon Apsc! The battery is very large and allows you to make almost 1000 shots (without using LV). It has everything you need to be a springboard for the semipro and pro world! I recommend the boundle purchase with 18-105 to newbies, and anyone who needs a 2nd compact apsc body! sent on February 01, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: aims starter is great, vr, good zoom range, relatively compact, very good feeling in the hand (good handle) Cons: dark, at 105 the pdc is quite wide and does not allow to make good blurred nor on plants nor of close-ups, difficult MAF's not clear (especially beginners like me) as fochettare Opinion: I think the primary objective is to have, worth the additional expense instead of 18-55 too short, dark, little used. this is a great way to make a lot of practice before realizing his own style as a photographer, especially before making unnecessary purchases! in each case the lens is good with plastics. the price is a bit 'too much for the quality of the lens sent on January 28, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
