|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcorlandino www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcorlandino  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Universal, Sharp, Excellent Construction. Cons: Lens hood that snaps badly Opinion: Bought a couple of years ago used by a user on Juza, too bad it arrived without the original box (I own all the packaging of my equipment) in the end the price was good and I didn't want to stick too much. That said, I would call this lens universal, almost not to take it off the camera. I like this focal length even more than the counterpart 50 of the Art series. The materials, finishes and dimensions are equal to its weight there is practically substance. Once calibrated with the appropriate doc it is perfect, very sharp, distortions practically absent if not negligible. Even at full aperture, it retains a remarkable sharpness even if you happen to be able to barrel the point of focus. I didn't see any noticeable problems in the AF. In backlight it generates a very small flare that is completely negligible. Using it purely in portraiture, I would say excellent for full figures and American cuts, but also in set portraits. The only really negative aspect is its lens hood, which often doesn't hook well when turned around and generates slight vignetting in two opposite and marginal areas in the images. Without wanting to sell the discovery of hot water, let's say that preferring more and more prime lenses at the expense of variable focal length lenses, this 35 is my favorite. sent on October 19, 2023 |
 | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: Well made, lightweight and compact, looks solid, price Cons: the lack of AF Opinion: I was looking for a Wide Angle/Fisheye without fainting and having a good quality in the final image. I bought this lens very compact in size and lightweight, however it looks solid and well made with a front lens that protrudes a lot. The manual use is not very intuitive although the distance scale on the barrel helps a lot in short, a little you have to get used to nothing impossible although some shots out of focus happen. The angle taken is very wide and in the frame you have to pay attention to your feet that it is easy to include in the margin without noticing. Used at full aperture it is not very sharp, an aspect that improves enormously as you close the aperture, from f8 it is excellent. It allows very creative shots by exploiting the distortion typical of this type of lens by putting it off axis with respect to the horizontal plane. Flare acceptable and color rendering a little off. I would say that I am fully satisfied with the amount spent. sent on September 05, 2022 |
 | Nikon D850 Pros: Solid machine body with well-arranged controls and menus, ergonomics. Cons: Unique failure Opinion: I purchased the D850 in February 2020 just before the lockdown, I had no opportunity to use it on the field in 21 days about twenty shots in the house to try until the shutter button no longer worked, that is, you did not feel the double click. According to the seller, the maximum period for replacement had elapsed and so I had to send it back to him for repair. Without prolonging myself and I don't know how, thanks to the period the camera was lost. I only received insurance compensation last July. In fact I have no elements to make an evaluation except the tactful sensation, well made and with the typical Nikon controls and menus that I find well laid out, excellent ergonomics for me that I have huge hands lets itself be held very well. According to the seller and online searches the fault I complained about is more unique than rare and even stranger was the disappearance along the journeys. Having said that, the seriousness of the online seller, of whom I type the name for fairness, has guaranteed me full compensation without starting long and expensive legal procedures. For now I have not bought it back yet, I am considering in the meantime an ML between Z6II and Z7II that could come if I am expected to have a delicious opportunity. sent on February 12, 2021 |
 | Huawei P8 Lite (2017) Pros: Constructive quality, design, performance, battery efficiency, telephony, camera, RAM memory, effective fingerprint reader Cons: in relation to the price range none. Maybe a display that is not resistant to fingerprints Opinion: I'm so fond of this brand, coming from a g700 and a P8 Lite Smart, and at home we all use Huawei. rn I purchased this device after evaluating the features online compared to the P9Lite which differs for very few even better things and convincing me more for aesthetics. I was not disappointed, for the price range I would say an excellent smartphone that, with my high average usage, guarantees a 1 day and a half to almost 2 (off night) autonomy. lightweight with a sleek and elegant design without frontal physical key and although it has a metal frame pattern it is well-finished with rounded edges, with a glass back cover that may make it a bit too slippery, in fact a silicon cover is suggested. rnRapidious in accessing features has never bumped and never went into a strong block of 3GB of RAM and 16 of expandable ROMs, it has a very bright and detailed screen that is well readable even with strong ambient light. the touch is sensitive and accurate. the browser is fast and the network is 4G allow you to browse and use apps in web connection with excellent response and speed of use. Huawei's interface hurt me a lot but it is a very subjective aspect. The safety compartment is great and access by fingerprint reader on the back is practical and effective. The camera compartment is suited to the price range where with ambient lighting it delivers great, detailed and chromaticly pleasing files, it suffers with low lights and at night where a good flash LED helps in close-up photos, close-up front camera. price, endowment, performance, and quality of realization as smartphones to be considered by absolute value. sent on September 04, 2017 |
 | Tamron Auto 135mm f/2.8 Adapt-A Pros: Made of metal and glass, well-made, f 2.5, compact and lightweight, adaptal system, economical for focal, pleasing and soft blur. Cons: Built-in hood is virtually useless Opinion: Coupling third-party lenses dating back to nikon is a difficult task but definitely not impossible, tamron's Adaptal system solves the problem of sin has not been implemented and developed. The lens is compact and well-made in metal and glass, with durable rubber parts, useless the built-in hood. Completely manual, maf and diaphragm; It is worth appreciating immediately the variation in aperture in the camera's viewfinder; The maf's light offers a proper resistance that makes it easy to find the correct point of fire; The yield seems good, clear already at TA with a low pdc and a soft blur, the color tone looks hot. I hooked it up with the d700 (I will soon try on the d750 and d7000) is the overall rendering is more than good, satisfying my curiosity of a medium manual canvases that i hope in the light of the right light should generate a blur of bubble. An economical lens (60 eur on ebay included adapter adapter and 2x teleconverter) but not really easy to find, however I can only recommend it. RnRiteSo using a manual lens is a great way to learn how to read light conditions without the help of electronics. sent on June 01, 2017 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Ergonomics and lightness, excellent file is Raw and Jpeg, dynamic range, with ISO quality high, tilting screen viewing experience. Cons: small body, some functional limitations. Opinion: After about a year I was waiting for the right opportunity, I possess the d750 from a few weeks, maybe a little early to express an opinion, however ......., I also have a d7000 and d700, so to force majeure I make the comparison and draw conclusions. Because of my hands large ergonomically I prefer the d700, although the handle carved making it safe to hold it much more than the d7000 with which it is comparable in size and weight. I carried out several shooting sessions using all the lenses of which are currently held, confirming the good things being said. Compared to the other two machine bodies obviously the qualitative leap of the image file is remarkable both for definition, for dynamic range and for better sealing using high ISO, since the generated noise is uniform in tone and easily recoverable (provided that over the 3200 / 4000 I have not yet driven). The shutter speed limitations do not see it as a limitation, I have rarely used speeds slower than 1/4000, what criminal feedbackzzante, to me that with d700 and d7000 use routinely is the flash sync speed of 1/250 and 1/320, the d750 stops at 1/200; aspect which I only found out after the last session and found a light to a dark band edge of the frame, something that convinced me to dotarmi as soon as possible, replacing analog ones, the triggers ttl / HSS in order to solve the whole problem . The locations of the buttons though similar to other Nikon bodies, is not comparable creating some confusion going from one body to another, but to assess them in its own right are sorted and easy to locate, someone will lamente failure aspect lighting that actually would have been a benefit. Having seen it used at different professionals (matrimonalisti) confirm that it can be safely used for professional purposes. I think it's cool tilting screen, which, although delicate-looking, is a boon in certain shooting situations. I have a maniacal care of my equipment, in fact, the other bodies appeared to be new and therefore with equal care custoI will say this d750 for so many years. I hope not to be among those few who have had problems, even under the assurance that Europe could lengthen the time of a possible repair. My verdict is: SUPERCONSIGLIATA sent on February 22, 2017 |
 | Samyang 85mm T/1.5 ED AS UMC Pros: Made of metal, very bright and very pleasant blur Cons: totally manual, difficult to find the right maf and exposure without an external exposure Opinion: Optics suitable for use video, personally used for a very short period photos are very disappointed, one good photo as maf and exposure every 20.rnla aperture ring no step nor makes it difficult to use in photography as you accidentally move, you have no feedback and exhibition room fire where the values ??given are misleading. rnNelle photos properly realized the lens is very sharp generates a very pleasant blur not allowing you to have pdc very ridotte.rnPersonalmente do not recommend it for use fotografico.rn sent on August 10, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
