|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franz67 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franz67  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R Pros: Solid construction, small size, sensor quality. PERFECT AF even in critical situations Cons: AF and slow shooting cadence for dynamic photos. Lack of joystick and rear wheel. Opinion: I've been using Canon for a long time and decided to continue with the R. The machine is built very well and holds smoothly despite its small size. I missed the wheel and the joystick right away. I disabled the bar and customized some buttons: eg. For iso, etc. After setting the parameters of AF properly I felt very good. In normal shots (landscapes, portraits, etc.) it is perfect and responsiveness is adequate. I found it very convenient to move the AF point with my thumb. I also did some birdlife on the fly with supertele with good results. The focus is always precise but the speed is low (e.g. lower than 5Ds and of course 7d2, series one)... however, it does not go down by adding the 2x. And the 500 configuration with 2x becomes very interesting for focus accuracy. Now I wait days with clear enough skies to look for the true limits of af speed and file quality. After the firmware update is promoted with flying colors with the limit of the shooting cadence. sent on January 25, 2020 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Responsiveness, speed and precision AF. High resolution, manageable digital noise to medium iso - low (I shot up to 800 iso). Price used very interesting. Cons: Battery consumption but it's a relative problem... Opinion: I needed a sportier body to accompany the 5dIII and for a few weeks I bought a used 7dII about a year. I chose the used as I was doubtful both for the opinions from other users and for the tests done personally in 2015. What about... I am pleasantly amazed. I had tried the newly released reflex and the files did not like me very much in comparison to 1d4 and 5d3, also it seemed that the files of the 7d2 were underexposed 2/3 of stop at the same iso (which was also found in a test made by a serious magazine that rated 2/3 stop the difference between real iso and nominal iso). Maybe the firmware was acerbic, maybe over the years they optimized production maybe the Canon DPP software has improved so much? I do not have an answer but the results seem different to me, that is, better than in the past. From the first shots I really liked the 400-500 iso despite the simple work-flow... Canon DPP for TIFF and then old Photoshop Elements to get the jpeg. The responsiveness and focus speed of the 7dII with 100-400is II and 500is II is great and very good with 500 plus 1.4x. At the moment I have not gone over 800 iso in birdlife and the results are very good considering the minor sensor (personal opinion, of course). To do a test I took some shots at a building surrounded by trees and human subjects from 100 iso to 3200 iso and I must say that the file begins to be noisy and with little detail only in the shadow yaves over 640-800 iso. I repeat at the moment the shots made in good light I like a lot. sent on May 03, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: fantastic lens with sharpness and Out of fabulous plans. high quality pictures even with the multipliers. Cons: Weight without stand and on the go Opinion: After using with satisfaction the various tele f4 Canon 300, 400 and 300 f5.6 f2.8 is I bought a few months the 400 f2.8 is used on the market. The first approaches were quite difficult due to the weight and size that slow down a bit 'fully operational and movements. Then the yield and operating speed to the great reward small initial sacrifices fact just everything is ready the lens pulls all his grit. If you use the stand the weight is not a big deal either with rocker heads with a ball head, which I personally prefer. The lens, slightly soft up to 3.2, shows all its character by closing a little 'the diaphragm: it takes only one stop even with the multiplier to obtain excellent results. I think the use of the natural differences in yield compared to the new version could be minimal. With this lens are obtained high level results in every situation of light. Saw the second-hand price the 400 is 2.8 is super recommended. sent on March 10, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Versatile and lightweight, excellent with multipliers. Cons: Price Opinion: After using it for several years, the 300 is F4 and for a year I bought 400 F 5.6 300 2.8. The excellent construction reveals immediately that you are in front in front of a perfect product from every point of view. I immediately appreciated the effectiveness of the stabilization and sharpness that leaves you speechless to 2.8 (where it reaches the highest levels) but is also great with the extender. Autofocus is fast even with the 1.4x slows down a bit 'with 2x without limiter distanza.rnUsato with APSC APSH or (as in my case) is very versatile and suitable for all types of photos naturalistic thanks to extender.rnIl Price is the only real limit. Recommended with extender series III. Rated 10 and praise. sent on February 19, 2015 |
 | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: File, reliability, construction, flurry, dual-slot, battery life, light meter, price (current) content Cons: LCD dated Opinion: I bought the 1d3 used last year after several years of Canon aps-c. E 'a series 1 fast and reliable in every situation. The viewfinder is very valid. The file is good up to 1600 iso. I shoot wildlife from the shed, portraits, street and travel photos. A limitation in the photo travel is the volume of the machine and the battery charger, really huge. In contrast, the battery runs out ever ... The resolution of 10 mpx is not a problem, I made enlargements up to 1 m long edge with excellent results. sent on June 25, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
