|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Anam72 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Anam72  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z8 Pros: AF system, customizations, viewfinder Cons: For now nothing apart from the cost of CFexpress Opinion: Taken shortly after arriving in stores I'm discovering it with use. I had already tried the Z9 several times so I was not surprised by the quality of the viewfinder and the AF system, in my opinion more than up to any need. The body is heavier and slightly more voluminous than the Z6 had to date but it is not a limit; For example, I did not take the additional base having a more than adequate grip already so. The battery does not give a sign of excessive consumption, just disable the wi-fi connections and the duration is fully comparable with that of the other Z (Z9 excluded), for those who intend to make a professional use it is certainly advisable to always have a second spare battery with you. Taken in kit with a CFE Lexar Diamond I do not have the slightest slowdown, neither with bursts at 20 fps nor with 8K video, I have not tested it under the direct sun but, for now, I have not noticed overheating or safety warnings. I will continue to update my review with use, but still found no compelling reason to complain about the purchase. PS: Lens mount and strap hooks all ok. sent on August 10, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S Pros: Comfort, general rendering, colors. Cons: Lacks stabilization, price (if taken without discounts) Opinion: Lens I took to replace the 24-70 f4 on my Z6. After using it for a long time I can confirm the excellent general qualities, as zoom everything does very well on every occasion. The fixed F4 aperture makes it great for travel, but even in the studio it has not paid much pledge. Flare and distortions absolutely contained and recoverable from Lightroom. Balanced in weight, it goes well with the full frame Z. The only real flaw is the price, better to take it on offer or used (if you find it). This is also why it would not have been a bad thing if he had stabilized. However, it is a lens that you will not sell easily once supplied. sent on January 20, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S Pros: Sharpness, AF speed. Cons: Price Opinion: Taken for portrait use on Z6, the cost is still a bit high compared to the idea of the 50mm but the yield turned out to be absolutely adequate. Resolve and sharpness far greater than seen with the F, weight and volume versions balanced and adapted to the machine body. Honestly there is nothing wrong, the blurry will not be a primacy but it is good and I have not detected problems of color rendering or light/shadow transition. In addition, Meike rings for Z also allow you to take macro-like photos at a very low cost. sent on January 11, 2021 |
 | Nikon Z 85mm f/1.8 S Pros: Sharpness, lack of AC. Cons: Price still high Opinion: Taken in place of the 85 f1.8 AF-S that I used on FTZ as a portrait medium I can only talk about it well. Nitida beyond any need on Z6 has a great yield. The only one is a tendency to counter and close the shadows more. Weight-to-volume ratio with the perfect zeta. It can give a feeling of lightness to those who are used to heavy zooms and metal optics. However a bets buy for the portrait, especially when prices have fallen to more normal levels. sent on December 05, 2019 |
 | Nikon Z6 Pros: Sensor, WB, lightness and handling on the go Cons: Cost, expensive memories, low grip, Opinion: Taken to replace the D800 and have a lighter travel kit I have no reason to regret the choice. Apart from the very high cost to be a camera with a non-record sensor like the D850. The body is well designed and the controls, especially for a nikonista, are well organized. The switch from the reflex is practically immediate apart from devoting yourself to reading the full-bodied manual to identify the various functions and customizations specific to a mirrorless. It has the defect of having a handle a little low, I solved by taking an additional sideburn that made me gain that centimeter in height that makes it perfect. In this it was more forward-thinking Canon who immediately provided an additional base. The viewfinder is excellent, certainly improveable, but already today offers a good experience and a reliable vision (but I do not practice avifauna nor extreme sports photography ). The battery has a good range, but it is advisable to have a spare one if you want to be comfortable on the go. The FTZ makes all Nikon AF-S lenses usable, some incompatibilities you may have with some third-party series that have been partially resolved with firmware updates. Fast and reliable XQD memory, too bad for the cost not really popular. sent on October 15, 2019 |
 | Nikon FTZ Pros: Efficient and light, well done. Cons: Increases the footprints of the lenses, high cost if taken apart. Opinion: I've been using this adapter on Nikon Z6 for a few months now and I can only talk about it well. Both the Nikon 85 f1.8 and The Tamron 70-200 and the Sigma 100-400 work well and without limits. Only for the Tamron G2 it was necessary to update the firmware otherwise it was not recognized by the machine, once updated everything ok. Definitely the best solution to use the F-lens park on the Z while waiting for the native versions. sent on August 28, 2019 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: General Performance, stabilization, value for money Cons: Scratch-sensitive plastic, light lens hood, need for upgrade to be able to work on Nikon Z via FTZ. Opinion: I use It for some time on the Nikon D800, now on Z6, I am very pleased with the choice, in the absence of an even Sigma features it was the only modern alternative to the Nikon FL which costs, however, more than double. Weight in the norm for this type of lenses, stabilization OK, yield and general optical performance more than good. To know that all Tamron G2 require a firmware update via TAP USB to be able to work with the new Nikon Z, once updated my works quietly via FTZ. sent on November 06, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Compact Cons: Price of the new off-market, AF slowness, Sharpness Opinion: Unlike other lenses, Nikon no longer deserves to be considered the first choice for a bright and quality 50 mm lens. Certainly better than the Sigma Art. It has a good compactness but it loses almost all openings as sharpness, and the AF engine shows the weight of the years. If you really want to buy it, look for it used, new Nital has a cost that makes no sense. sent on March 16, 2018 |
 | Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Pros: Great value, easy handling, sharpness in daylight Cons: Dark (in fact a 6.3 already at 130 mm), lack of collar Opinion: Lens bought for a safari trip in Africa did not disappoint, obviously a Sigma 150-600 is best place too, (in order to remain on lenses from the same manufacturer), but for the cost that this is a lens that allows you to practice photography with long focal lengths at an affordable price-performance that dignity. Used on Nikon D800 AF it lived up to the needs. The major flaw is the little light that falls to just 100 mm focal stretches 6.3 initials. Better use it with good light filled to avoid having to raise too the ISO or having trouble focusing on moving subjects. On the other hand, it is lighter than a 70-200 f 2.8 and has the same size, some compromises you have to accept it. The direct competitor is the recent Tamron di the same focal length. sent on March 14, 2018 |
 | Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/2M Pros: Quality files, detail and risolvenza, robustness. Cons: Slightly heavy, AF failure, high cost. Opinion: Taken to replace the Nikon AF-S and to get a true Macro lens in the kit. Mounted on my Nikon D800 without compatibility problems. The Raw files contain the indication of the lens used and the shooting data, and you can change the aperture with the same mode of the Nikon AF-S lenses. classy high quality files and blurred, matching the best fixed. The weight is double the Nikon AF-S but does not bother to use. The manual focus, although limited the viewfinder no longer thought to this type of lens is precise and easy thanks to the perfect and smooth run of the Zeiss ring. The lens is tropicalized, easily usable even outside in the rain. The only drawback over 1,000 Euros needed to buy it and the lack autofocus. sent on March 01, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
