|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AlessioSaal www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlessioSaal  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D750 Pros: General quality of the raw files, auto-focus, low noise, video quality, flat video mode, ergonomics, tilting screen Cons: After a long time of no use Opinion: fantastic camera raw files that churns out are fantastic and very workable, not to mention the truly exceptional quality at high ISO, up to 6400 images with very little noise and are also in the video noise is very poor especially if the movie does not strong underexposure. The autofocus is also excellent with significant underexposure, the flat mode helps a lot in the post production of a video (of course is not an s-log or log-c but does his duty). It has very good ergonomics (much better than the d600-610), and the tilting screen is really a pleasant surprise for videos. Certainly not a a7rii or d810 for resolution or color depth but this car is perhaps the most balanced in terms of the performance of Nikon. sent on October 21, 2016 |
 | Sony A7r Pros: High resolution viewfinder, image quality, video quality, ability mf optical use. Cons: Number and dedicated objectives cost, battery life, delicacy, high ISO, noise ergonomics. Opinion: This car really offers an amazing resolution that is especially noticeable in enlargements of the PC or prints 50x70 up. In your hand feels like a toy even though it is a concentrate of high technology, personally I prefer a body that is heard in hand robust and stable, I found the touch, also a little delicate and you have to be careful not to slam anywhere because black coating is away at once and you see the silver metal that lies beneath. The viewfinder is really a phenomenal thing, comfortable and bright, also owns the peaking focus allowing Perfect focus even if it is not always 100% accurate especially of large apertures. The image quality is generally good although the noise is already known by ISO 2000; even videos (avchd with H.264) encoding are really good. Unfortunately I was pushed to change this body because of the optics because there are so very few dedicated than other brands and also being very expensive (I find unacceptable spAKING 2300 Euros for a 24-70) that in the end, despite being zeiss, solve the vast number of MPs less than other nikon or canon that cost half or even less if you buy used. The really poor battery life, 300 shots to the limit and even videos just over half an hour continuously. Convenient (and also perhaps mild) the orientation features. I find it almost unnecessary to buy this machine in order to have a light body if you are interested in shooting with af dedicated objectives in their weight as those for SLR apart from 3 or 4 pieces if using vintage lenses instead makes sense because between the body and two goals, maybe 28 and 35 mm, do not even get to 1kg and footprint is minimal. sent on March 16, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Building, color, sharpness, price (today). Cons: Gently engine af, chromatic aberration. Opinion: really fantastic lens. The yield from f / 2.8 is already high, then if we close up to 4-5.6 is really at the top. Plays of the fantastic colors, pretty open shadows, deep colors and shades never too net. Goal that nowadays is also 700 Euros, I preferred this to the 24-70 1000 Euros and I was really happy, really recommended. The only flaw is the delicacy of the af system (I have never had similar problems but I often read that some models suffer from the failure of the engine af) and perhaps a bit of chromatic aberration of subjects with sky behind. Fantastic lens that I use to d600, practically perfect. sent on November 12, 2015 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Value for money, made from f / 4, color, zoom range, robustness, price. Cons: Use f / 2.8-4, weight and size, use filters, flare. Opinion: Definitely the best super-wide zoom for its money. At f / 2.8 is pretty much useless, but by f / 4 the yield is already very good, from f / 5.6 is fantastic: the pictures are really detailed, distortion at 16mm is of course obvious but 20mm is poor, also produces excellent color if personally too saturated and contrasted. The lens is as heavy as others in its class, however, the feeling of an objective robust and indestructible mode af-mf lens can not find it uncomfortable and hiking from 16 to 28 mm I find it interesting, perfect for many types of photography. Unfortunately it is not possible the use of screw-on filters because the lens is protruding (such as 14-24 nikkor), and perhaps the biggest minus is the flare that in sunny days without clouds is practically always present (even the so-called ' 'rainbow' '). RNLA lens as I said toits price is really great, and putting aside the flare and the little goodness to use f / 2.8 is a more attractive alternative to expensive 14-24 (I have used paid but almost new 450 euro ... ) that costs three times. Good lens, I was stunned. sent on November 12, 2015 |
 | Nikon D600 Pros: Quality image sensor, raw files, ergonomics, high ISO performance, price. Cons: Buffer saving and displaying images a bit slow, dirt on the sensor, 30 fps at 1080p, tropicalizzazione.AF Opinion: I have this camera for almost two years with whom I really took thousands of photos. The camera despite not fully tropicalized by the feel of a well-made and sturdy and dials are intuitive and are in their right places. The yield of the developed images in Camera Raw and Photoshop is really fantastic, the shadows are recovered without problems and graphics are very clean. The 24 MPs are sufficient for most uses that it can do, and prints up to 50x70 (obviously on quality paper) are practically perfect, in excess of this size do not know. The yield at high ISO is fantastic, up to 3200 ISO there is virtually noise and also in 6400 that the files are no longer usable, detailed and with little noise; also great for long exposure with the NR switched to high ISO and long exposure. The color depth and dynamic range are fantastic and very close to the eye than the sisters maggiori.rnI movies they're fine but the 30fps 1080p sometimes have a limit to ripmade '' art '' that require slow motion. The af in critical situations is a little hesitant. When we take in raw different images, one after the buffer crashed some requiring the display of them waiting for a few seconds. The biggest minus, still one of the few, is dirt on the sensor: it gets dirty really easily and also after cleaning several times and have changed the shutter via Nikon dirt re-accumulates thus making slower and especially tedious postproduction . This last feature is actually to take account for the purchase of a car usata.rnGeneralmente, finally, it is a great machine, in all and for all, the files that churns are approximately 25mb therefore very lightweight in the range 800. From a lot of satisfaction and apart from the problem of dirt on the sensor believe a camera almost excellent. sent on November 12, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
