|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
SanDro32 www.juzaphoto.com/p/SanDro32  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 6D Pros: Light, high hold iso, wi-fi, price Cons: Few AF points Opinion: I picked it up after a couple of years because at the price that is in the used currently is a best buy. I was tempted by the ML Canon, but in terms of weight savings in the end I didn't earn anything, and I preferred to take back the little Canon house. I use it in outputs where I want to stay light (I also have 1DX and 7DII), with attached the 24-105. The yield even at high iso is excellent, the 3200 are fully usable. Too bad for the few AF points, but the center is a real sniper, and that's enough. Great for landscape use, in the backpack with 14mm in the mountains you do not feel the weight, also great the ability to control it via wi-fi from your smartphone. Had she had a few more AF points would have been 10. sent on August 23, 2019 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Minimum MAF distance, stabilizer, MAF speed, all focal zoom lock, calibration docks and fw updates Cons: F/B focus, support Opinion: Taken with an opportunity on the market replaced the old version that I have used for 3 years. I was a bit fearful because of certain reviews read, and that's why for a couple of months I kept them both. Squeezed well in various situations, from the stalking to the wandering hunting, it proved superior to the old version in many respects. 1. Sharpness. The old at 400mm became soft, this up to 500 holds up well. 2. MaF speed and accuracy. Compared to the previous series, it holds up the chases better even on uncontested backgrounds. In AI-Servo, it keeps the subject hooked until you follow 3. Reduced minimum MAF distance from 2.7 to 2.2 meters. For some a minor detail, in my opinion half a meter difference is felt. 4. Tripod ring already with Ark cut, comfortable and without needing to add plates. I think it's more stable to mount it like this. 5. Improved and customizable stabilizer via dock, with three options depending on the situation. 6. Zoom the die to the desired focus. Of the old Man I appreciated the possibility (random?) of being able to block at 400mm the distance. Now you can do it at any length. Convenient when shooting remotely, setting the machine as if it were a phototrap without worrying that it might change the framed field. 7. Ability to adjust the af and update the fw autonomously, without resorting to assistance with biblical times. The weight has remained the same for the G2, and unfortunately also the Polyphoto assistance. Basically a great lens for those who do not want to spend too much, and also for those who want to have more versatility sacrificing a bit of sharpness. sent on August 21, 2019 |
 | Canon 1DX Pros: Solid, ergonomic, fast, precise, complete. Finally I do not have to buy the BG to balance the optics Cons: Non-existent silent click Opinion: After so much I managed to buy it. A show! The files that churns out are among the most workable I've ever seen in the house Canon. Crazy AF, light meter and spectacular gust. The high ISO seal is in line with the sensors of the period (6d and 5DIII) as digital noise, but the recovery of shadows and lights is much simpler. The 18 mpx are more than enough, even in birdlife. I prefer to try to get closer rather than tempt crop exate. The only downside is the silent shot which is not silent at all. But it is a flaw that you will gladly forgive. sent on February 01, 2019 |
 | Canon 1D Mark IV Pros: All Cons: By buying now the AF module allowed, no excessive crop Opinion: I found it at a bargain price, with mooooolti shots, but who cares. Is a tank. A truly top of the line. If I were to replace the shutter there would have earned. Spectacular files though with only 16mpx. Absolutely super speed and responsiveness. By buying in 2018 and comparing it to the latest models (I 5DIII and 7DII) you notice an AF less customizable, but we're talking about a camera with 9 years ago. the aps-h (that Canon has unfortunately abandoned) allows you to "stretch" their focal lengths while maintaining a good bokeh in portraits. The alternate to 7DII sport/BirdLife, though often prefer it to the solid feel you from using it, and for better grip from 1600 up to ISO 6400 (printing the noise you notice much less than a video). 16 mpx sensor allows minimum crop, on pain of loss of detail. But apart from these trifles is a lady car today. sent on May 04, 2018 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: AF module, reactivity, price Cons: JPEG does not measure up, no wi-fi Opinion: I picked up an aps-c body after a period of total addiction to FF. The crop factor is necessary in some situations, and rather than mount a multiplier and lose speed and brightness I preferred a new camera body, given the attractive price I found new. I had loved (little) and hated (much) the old 7 d, and for this I was kept away from his heir, but after 60 d, 70D and 80D I was wanting a more massive body from abuse in the outputs in nature. I could try for a few days thanks to a friend, and after reviewing the RAW (JPEG improvement IMHO) I decided it was the right machine. An AF customizable and with a great, even better reactivity 5DIII I (albeit slightly but better). Full compatibility with Tamron lenses that I have, and excellent resolution. ISO handling is that of a smaller package. Up to 1600 there is need little pp, plus the noise is there, but in those cases I use 5DIII. One thing missing, and that I had enjoyed on other bodies (6 d, 70D and 80D) is the assenda of wi-fi, convenient to remotely control the camera. In fact you could solve with the SD of Canon, but so you lose the convenience of double slots. Other than that, for me is promoted to major. sent on May 04, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: Lightweight, compact, clear Cons: Nobody else, otherwise I took something else Opinion: Among the fixed, the only focal with which I have always found good is 35mm. I had for a while the Sigma Art. Bello, clear to be disgusting, but just the excessive sharpness and af "dancer" made me give up and I sold it to those who have more patience than me with focus charts and via saying (and now he uses it with satisfaction). I had three options in the canon house, and thanks to a well filled piggy bank, I was almost decided on the second series. But here too the problem of sharpness (for me in some cases the sharpness is a problem). In the end the only real choice (which was the first) was the 35 1.4 I series. rnA TA is obscenely mellow, clear only in the middle, it seems almost a mistake. And instead in that mistake, in that pastiness there is what I was looking for. Today with the various sw you look for the tiltshift effect, this lens has already incorporated it. A gradual loss of sharpness that almost seems like a brushstroke. rnE just close a little bit that becomes a blade. One nitsurgical ideology, which despite the years of difference has nothing to envy to the latest projects by Canon and Sigma. I waited a long time to decide, but in the end it was. rn sent on December 02, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, value for money Cons: At the moment no one Opinion: I've been around for almost two years, I was looking for a 70-200 to replace my Bianchino (sold at a time of overturning the kit). At the same price in the used I could have a stabilized lens but f2.8, honestly I did not think too much. I tried it well, on 5D2 and 70D before, and on 5D3 and 6D then, always with great satisfaction. I like the colors that it returns, the sharpness already at TA and the stabilizer (which you have to get used to with the image in the viewfinder). Rn The MAF does not seem so slow as some say, although I can not compare it to Biancone (which also costs double ...) I use it also multiplied, and sharpness does not severely affect it. sent on September 03, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto zaino Off road 30L (MB OR-BP-30GY) Pros: Robust, well distributed space, great photo gallery Cons: If you want to be fussy, you miss a higher pocket Opinion: Since I've studied for more than a year the best solution to combine trekking and photography, experimenting with the most varied solutions, from the trekking backpack with the various backpacks and shoulder straps to the inside, all with no satisfaction.rnrnThree for outbound trips one day, at most two. The space for the photographic material is vast, I put in 5DmkIII, Tamron 150-600 and Tamron 24-70 (obviously disassembled). In the pocket of the belt was the Samyang 14mm. Externally attached the tripod (and in some sections the trekking sticks). Inside the room comfortably hosts a full change of food, poncho and ultralight sleeping bag. The bottle is the harbor in the outer retina, and in the side pocket I put other useful accessories. The front pocket, however, is a shallow use for wallet, multipurpose, energy bars and charts (although I always use the gps, which I put to the belt) .nnts the back ventilation system with the retina separating the backpack from the back, and for me that sudo so much & egrave; a real manna from the sky.rnHave the straps below to hook up the curtain, but I have not yet experienced their resistance. rnInsomma, recommended for a ready-to-use solution. sent on September 03, 2017 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Construction, cost, stabilizer Cons: Variability of specimens Opinion: I had to try it 3 before finding that right, but now it has become the main optic of my kit. Having no chance to spend more than double for the Canon II series (I'm not a professional so I would not be able to cushion the expense) I tried both the I series and the little brother F4. The first did not convince me for clarity, the second is clear, but unfortunately it's just F4. I wanted to try the Tamron, and after looking for a copy in the used that it was okay I bought it and I'm quite satisfied. Of course, the Canon II series is superior, but it is (unfortunately) also the price. I think that for an amateur is a great solution without getting faint sent on June 26, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: build quality, AF, high ISO performance Cons: To want it all, the lack of Wi-Fi Opinion: After years with the MkII I made the jump to the MkIII basically to have an AF worthy of the name. Spectacular. Fast, and accurate on all points (with the MkII was the only accurate central). At high ISO maintains a clarity far superior to the previous version. Combined with a canvas it is still balanced (best with a BG anyway). AF and ISO performance also make it very usable for nature photos in lower light conditions, type in the woods. The Wi-Fi was not essential to have it, however, because of bodies like the 70D is present, they could include it. I find it convenient, is to pass quickly the files on the tablet, where now I can have a good preview, both oper use remote shooting with shots particolari.rnNel complex a lady reflex. sent on December 19, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
