|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mauro Frison www.juzaphoto.com/p/MauroFrison  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Lowepro Fastpack Pro BP 250 AW III Pros: Materials, ergonomics, instrumentation protection, design Cons: at the moment none Opinion: I needed to have a backpack that could combine photographic passion with office work (since I always carry the SLR with me) and this model is for me: laptop pocket (I have a 15.6") where there is also a notepad and the well-organized photographic compartment to fit my equipment. The materials are of quality and ergonomically I found no problems. sent on November 30, 2022 |
 | Zeiss Pancolar Jena 50mm f/1.8 Zebra Pros: brightness, color rendering Cons: nobody at the time Opinion: vintage lens that I found at about 70 euros. I was curious to experience photography a little less "automatic". I use it in the macro field, where it seems to me that it blures out some not bad, associated with a good detail. The brightness is excellent; returns files with vivid colors. Use with tripod is a must for optimal MAF. sent on May 08, 2021 |
 | Tokina AT-X 11-20mm f/2.8 PRO DX Pros: Sharpness, focal opening, overall brightness, good build quality and non-outrageous price. Cons: at the moment no one except the fact that you have to take your hand with the AF/MF ring Opinion: Purchased this Tokina used by RCE (but practically new), after using Canon's 10-22 EF-S for years. On an overall level I am so far satisfied with the choice: the lens has a good clarity and brightness, the diaphragm 2.8 is certainly a not indifferent plus that is then found in the photos that it churns out. Certainly also good quality of the materials used. Ergonomically it is well balanced. As almost everyone has already pointed out, the small mole is that AF/MF ring that is a bit annoying to use when you are used to the selectors of the other objectives. sent on April 13, 2021 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Price, general chromatic yield, sharpness, stabilizer Cons: Nobody at the time Opinion: It is now six months that I use this lens, purchased after a long period of reflection and benchmark. I was looking for a bright tele with which to retire the old EF-S 18-200: I had already ruled out the white Canon 2.8 for price issues and this one fell to bean. Clearly, accustomed to the old Canon handyman, I found myself in another world: the chromatic rendition, brightness and sharpness are extraordinary, even on an old APSC like my 70D. The AF is accurate and fast and the stabilizer is really effective. At the ergonomic level I found no flaws, the ring nuts are fluid and precise. The weight feels everything, especially if you bring it for long periods but we are talking about a "pro" optic. For me it is a good compromise between cost and quality provided. sent on July 04, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Construction, AF, brightness, color rendering, lens hood, macro function Cons: suffering to flares Opinion: I am using this lens for four months and now I can express an opinion about. Coming from EF-S 18-200, I found myself facing an abyss when I started using the 24-70, as to yield files with 70D: First sharpness, brightness and color rendering. The AF is fast, quiet and precise. rnrnTrovo the macro whose function is very convenient equipped: to be a short focus lens produces the blurred pretty good and the MAF distance allows to work very close to soggetto.rnrnA ergonomics is very well built, solid and balanced level weight distribution, not too bulky. Amazing the hood that mounts and dismounts effortlessly thanks to precise tolerances and the neo sgancio.rnrnUnico button is some suffering to flares when shooting contrluce (both day and night with the moon) .rnrnNon mostly from the car deadlift except for the few cases of wide use. sent on February 27, 2017 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: robust body and to tropical touch and mobile display, quality photo Cons: high ISO sensitivity Opinion: Using this camera body now 2 and a half years. E 'was the first reflex, after being shifted from a bridge (SX40 HS). For the amateur that I do, I can only be happy. The machine body is almost PRO levels for robustness, ergonomics and resistance to atmospheric agents; Excellent mobile display that allows you to take even not easy positions thanks to the touch function. The yield of the photo is good in my avviso.rnUn bad point is the yield at high ISO: I noticed that going over 1250 quality risente.rnNon they are absolutely regretted that purchase. sent on November 23, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: Zoom range, IS Cons: Coupling to lock sliding lens, lens hood lack, brightness Opinion: Goal that use 90% on my 70D, I find "honest" about the quality of the photos. It 'a handyman, so normal that there are trade-offs with respect to objectives gamma.rnApprezzo very top of the stabilizer that performs its function effectively even at maximum brightness estensione.rnrnSul front, pay a bit' in low light conditions and on focal thrusts, forcing you to compensate by increasing ISO or shutter speed. rnrnIl mechanism focal elongation is very soft and with the machine shoulder rest position stretches alone; This has obliged to add a lock button which is very uncomfortable. I think as Canon could have done more, especially in comparison to another lens that I use, the Tamron 70-300, where the extension system is very focal migliore.rnrnPer finish, but it's a classic for IS lenses, missing hood and I think this is a gap that should be colmato.rn sent on April 23, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
