|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fggalassi www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fggalassi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Mini 3 Pro Pros: weight, anti collision sensors, activetrack, 48MP, 4k 60fps, dimensions, obstacle detection. Cons: lack of side sensors , Opinion: I have this dji for several weeks but I tested it only nearby in known environments and for what little I could try I was very impressed by the obstacle detection sensors and the tracking mode really well done and useful, unfortunately missing the side sensors and this limits very much the fact of keeping it low in environments with obstacles in chase mode, I risked a couple of times the disaster just because chasing me sideways near trees does not see the branches and I saved it by stopping and retreating quickly just for pure luck .. it is definitely better to keep it high out of the problems, removed this only positive things although I must say that all this difference in the movies between the 12 MP SE model and this I did not notice, or at least I expected much more thing that is noticeable instead in the photos. all in all with 1000€ you have a light pocket drone that you can use without a license and take anywhere. sent on July 22, 2022 |
 | DJI Mini SE Pros: Cheap, lightweight(249g), versatile ,good wind resistance, 29 minutes effective flight, beautiful. Cons: lack of activetrack ,no collision sensors front and back, 12 mp are not many , not suitable for night Opinion: my first DJI followed then by the mini 3 pro .. it is a well-made product, cheap, light 249g so you do not need the license just register on d-flight and download qrcode, the battery allows you to have fun and do all the necessary tests, obvious to have a spare one does not hurt, for shooting to put on social media the 12MP and 2.7K are also too many you do not need to go further, unfortunately it does not have the activetrack function that can only be found from the mini 3 pro up .. but for less than 300 € you can not expect much, there are no front and rear anti-collision sensors, it has only those for landing, let's say that it is an entry level with which you can do everything and if something goes wrong you have not thrown away thousands of euros ... especially if you shoot at the sea or on the beach the risk that a bird throws the drone into the water is high and better to sacrifice this from 270 € than the mini 3 pro from more than 1000 .. the dedicated app is done very well and allows you to edit already from the smartphone very easily, has many options and even an impractical one manages to produce decent clips. sent on July 21, 2022 |
 | Nikon D500 Pros: AF, burst, viewfinder, ISO seal, Ergonomics,, 5 x, buffer Cons: Fragility screen folding, little else Opinion: What about, great iron! The heir of the d300s "that still use" excellent burst AF superlative, complete menu of all you need, there are a bit of "tricks" to be able to exploit it in full especially in birdlife but once you learn you find yourself in your hands a deadly weapon! The sensor is good.. Not very good of course between the DX is not better, the buffer is infinite, as the pleasure of shooting with this toy! If you want a super burst and a lightning-fast AF in an ergonomic and lightweight body well the D500 is definitely the right machine! sent on November 16, 2018 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: Silent, ergonomic, with a great dynamic range, huge crop capability, no anti-filtering filter, battery life Cons: Slow, heavy files, slow AF, few fps, no XQD, needs quality goals, high ISO hold Opinion: I suggest that use in the less suitable field for her .. (avifauna), so my review leaves the time it finds. I like the silence of the shot, really discreet when it comes silently it's great not to look into it , The battery life is more than enough to make a thousand shots, the dynamic range is excellent and allows exceptional recovery on shadows / lights, but if you do not have quality goals, virtually all of its best quality is defeated, AF slow but precise miserable bursts that sometimes made me lose several scene clou, it would be better to put an XQD card instead of sd, but you can not have everything, good the wear of the used, for now hard to find better. . sent on July 04, 2017 |
 | Sigma 500mm f/4.5 EX DG HSM Pros: size, weight, speed AF, generous carrying handle, price (of used), excellent DG version finished very well. Cons: not very balanced, absence of the stabilizer (which never hurts) even if the use is mainly a tripod, difficult to multiply, little contrast to TA, not tropicalized Opinion: let's say that after several tests with all my camera bodies I could find that on D3s and D300s it is really valid! while on D810 something does not come back to me .. seems to work better on sensors not very dense MPX, or simply is not the perfect match, I will check by doing other tests in the coming days, new costs about € 4800 to take a good used about 2000 / € 2500 which turns out to be a good expense for this goal, excellent workmanship, good weight even if it is not really well balanced, used freehand would surely make the "VR" comfortable, it takes a bit of practice to get used to it, the AF is good, not comparable to the new 500 nikon but not so much worse, for the multiplier instead, it turns out to be considerably lower than nikon with kenko 1,4x AF is nervous and uncertain and certainly not very precise to the point that I prefer to use it smooth when I need more mm I mount the body on the right and I get 750mm excellent from f5.6 onwards, in fact in TA is lacking in contrast and like all thegoals from the best of them from f7.1 to f10 sent on July 01, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 105mm f/2.8 G ED VR Micro Pros: colors, blur, sharpen, well built Cons: vr, af slow and uncertain times Opinion: great lens for macro not too pushed, you can safely use freehand although vr is not exactly latest generation, well built and well balanced, releases color fidelity with an enviable blurred, and a sharpness to top.l'AF not it is a lightning but in macro is not critical, sometimes in low light or with parties struggling hard to keep up but still highly recommended hard to better. sent on June 26, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR Pros: Focal excursion, VR, price around € 1300, proportional bracket, sharpness, AF very silent Cons: Lightweight loose, weight (after a pound is felt), excessive rotation from 200 to 500mm, unnecessary containment bag, not tropicalized Opinion: As for the AF I did not have many zoom comparison terms with such a high focal length, but it seemed fairly responsive with limitation at 6m is faster than my 300 f4 d ED multiplied by 1.7X and it's almost silent It does not feel working, VR works very well, and the sharpness is good compared to 300 f4 smooth, the bracket is comfortable and well proportioned, the hood is weak and plasticous, the weight despite being well balanced after a while it feels It's definitely best to use it with a mono foot or stand, wrist rotation from 200 mm to 500 is excessive, I would have liked to have all the excursion in a quarter of a lap, it is not tropicalized which means that sooner or later you will It will fill up with dust, do not have the attachment for the shipping straps and the supplied bag is useless they could make a semi-rigid case as per the 300th. All in all for the price they did a good job you can not claimTo compare it with 5-6000 lenses. In conclusion it is a good lens that is worth what costs and more than what it costs .. sent on March 26, 2016 |
 | Nikon TC-17E II Pros: Sharp, and excellent quality Cons: Inevitably it slows down a bit 'the af, expensive, Opinion: Great Tc to bring a 300 to 500 without losing quality and sharpness inevitably af slows down a little but nothing irremediable, certainly better than 2x is a bit worse than 1.4x in terms of speed, but for the rest is perfect! I use the 300 F4 with great satisfaction and certainly the 2.8 is even better !! sent on January 12, 2016 |
 | Nikon D3100 Pros: Light almost pocket, economic, excellent starting point in the world of SLR, Battery Life Cons: Burst, ring for shortcuts absent, a little 'cumbersome but intuitive Opinion: A good reflex to start, definitely forces you to work a little 'to have good results, but overall is very low given the price of the new that of the used hard to get better, excellent battery life, very poor almost nonexistent gust, 14 megapixels are good but the fact of not having the nuts for shortcuts penalizes a little 'the choice of the line 3000 to the line of Nikon 5000 and 7000, however, a good car that teaches us to have patience and take the 'adequate time to take a good photo. Not recommended for use in sports and birdlife, Highly recommended for those who like to travel light and shoot videos are not great but still acceptable. sent on December 14, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 D IF ED Pros: Light crisp great price of the used 77 mm diameter filters Cons: Motor Af nothing, nothing VR, suffers backlighting Opinion: Practical and lightweight makes his dirty work without problems, minimum maximum yield spending, mounts 77mm filters are then calmly, and also low cost has a good color rendering and little distortion at the maximum focal, skews a bit to 18mm, not ago miracles but neither disappoints, I have not found much difference with the most recent version (that and more expensive also) so I opted for this version although it does not have the internal motor Af. sent on December 05, 2015 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: Ergonomics, keys in the right place, AF, dual slot cf / sd, burst Cons: Videos, weight, noise around 1000 ISO, Opinion: I was able to use it for a couple of months a few years ago, then he left the D7000 and with my phobia of mega pixels taken quest'ultima..errore.la Nikon D300s remains the last dx pro !!! fantastic body a pleasure to hold, although nearly kg !! The cleanliness of its file I have made back the desire and thanks to a Fantom91 forum user who thank him publicly for his kindness honesty and promptness (now rare qualities) I gave this camera body. With a fast and precise AF and buttons all the right places allow you to shoot in bursts and change the settings without having to take your eye from 'frame, 12 megapixel will not be many but the D300s exploits them fully and if you do not make large prints even need, who does many crop is only because it has the wrong inquadratura..per video department is a different story certainly is not up to the latest Nikon, or rather say that it is almost unusable with Cell succeed better, for the noise typeAlso here the last born in the house Nikon are definitely better here we can not push beyond ISO 1600 but still in post production will solve everything sent on December 03, 2015 |
 | Nikon D3s Pros: It is a tank robust reliable in any situation, clean files, excellent image quality with high ISO Cons: Heavy but the flagships are well! , Does not arrive at 50 ISO, maybe 12 mpx are a bit short for large prints dimensioni.video not up to the latest generation of Nikon Opinion: Excellent machine for sport and photographic hunting, a real flagship professional, a pleasure to hold and to look at, although it is not a featherweight. Tropicalised not afraid of the weather or the climate rigid, always produces clean files, short supply of some mega pixels but if you do not have to superwide printing more than enough I are very satisfied and recommend it to all who want a body pro at a reasonable price can be found on the market by 2000/2500 € with not too many clicks !!! sent on November 08, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 D ED Pros: Price, blurred, building optical lens solid and robust made the old fashioned way, with Tc 1.4 AF remains unchanged with 1.7 slows down a bit ', minimum distance of focus, I will also do the macro! Cons: Bracket, I put the kirk and I solved all problems, missing vr for those who feel the need .. Opinion: All in all a great goal relatively light, with a great fuzzy and a minimum distance of focus enviable af a fast and accurate when used with limiter to 3 m, at a price of used ragionevole.nel market is at great prices ! Very good already at full aperture it is great if you already closed to a stop, the bracket is certainly improvable I kirk collar that fits perfectly and is comfortable and meets the challenge generated by the original bracket. sent on November 08, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
