|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Paranoid www.juzaphoto.com/p/Paranoid  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 24-105 mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, lightning-fast AF, all-rounder travel, stabilizer and ultra-quiet USM Cons: Generous weight and dimensions, internal movements due to stabilization games, non-premium material, too high price Opinion: I state that this is perhaps the most difficult review and among the optics I tested, this 24-105 still leaves me some doubts about its vaunted quality. First of all, the construction materials are clearly below the savings compared to the "old" EF, to cite a striking example, the hood does not even have the internal velvet to collect dust, but simply the grooves made with cnc. The outer casing is of a semi-porous opaque plastic, to which it is very easy to leave fingerprints and marks with nails or rings, the switches for AF and IS are not embossed and with gloves difficult to operate, but still a minor flaw. Despite being built with plastics not really of quality, the optics is still pesantuccia and on my small RP is quite unbalanced, in use then, it feels as if inside something moves back and forth, giving a perception of fragility. They say it's the stabilization system that has games. Still about the stabilizer, I find that of the 35 f1.8 much more efficient, while this has often caused me micromoves with shutter speeds where my old 24-70 f4 never failed! In short, it is a beautiful optic, but for what it costs I do not think it is worth the transition from EF so much. Speaking instead of the merits, the focal range is very comfortable, 9-blade diaphragm, good blur, sharpness and contrast from true professional optics. Too bad for that shake at shutter speeds a bit 'low, I will test it better and if the problem should always be repeated, I will take it to assistance for a stabilizer check. For now half happy. sent on March 09, 2023 |
 | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: Sharpness, compactness, weight, 9-blade diaphragm and very very effective stabilizer Cons: Usual missing hood, not tropicalized and lens extending externally Opinion: I use this gem on Eos RP, I find it a really fantastic combination, as between camera and lens you get to "only" 800 grams. The optical quality is very high already from 1.8, I found myself very well even in rather dark places, where the stabilizer works real miracles! Also convenient to approach the macro, although in my opinion with a 35mm does not make much sense. The autofocus is fast but is not at the levels of the USM, too bad also for the piece of lens that protrudes on close subjects. It lacks the usual hood and the rubber ring that could make it more tropicalized, a real shame because the quality for me is high. sent on February 27, 2023 |
 | Canon EOS RP Pros: Low weight, autofocus, articulated touchscreen, button customization, price Cons: Maybe not really ergonomic if you have big hands or using gloves, sensor practically uncovered, only 1/4000" Opinion: I come from 7 years of Canon 6D, I switched to mirrorless just for the merits that I listed and that I was looking for in the Eos RP. I state that at first glance it seems a bit traumatic the passage, the camera is really small and it seems to lack the controls, but once customized and "sewn" around your hands and needs, it is really the perfect camera. The fully articulated touch screen is a real must that I would not do without, allowing poses that with the 6D I avoided for inconvenience, touchscreen and fast autofocus are then that gem that will make you love this machine from the first exit. Many complain about the battery life, I took it to Lofoten in winter and the autonomy seemed acceptable to me, I had also brought with me 4 spare alternative batteries but I never used them, because I charged as soon as I could the original one in the room with the 25w power supply of my smartphone. Using it with the 24-105 RF actually seems quite unbalanced, with the Samyang 14 and adapter it goes a little better, but the surprise lies in using it with 35 RF1.8, where it shows all its quality and creativity in only 800 grams. The burst is not very fast, but those who choose the RP certainly have no pretensions to do photographic hunting or sports activities, there are other more specialized products, however the autofocus tracking on the eye gives a fundamental help not to make this little one a machine for static subjects only. If I really have to find a fault, I found it very uncomfortable using it with gloves, as with the thumb I found myself pressing a little random keys unintentionally, but it is the normal consequence if you are looking for compactness and portability. Another flaw but not very important, the raw files are in cr3 format not readable by lightroom, you must first transform them into dng with a converter, which involves in post production an extra step, but nothing dramatic. Thinking instead of a speech of care and maintenance, they could at least make sure that the sensor remained covered by the curtain as in the eos R, I trusted in a firmware update but I think it will be hard to receive this upgrade, then shutter speed "only" 1/4000, but even in this case, I think they are all choices to differentiate well the commercial choice of the various products. For now I am very happy, she will be my faithful companion of adventures. sent on February 27, 2023 |
 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN C Pros: Solid weight and construction, compactness, sharpness, 1.4 9-blade diaphragm, very pleasant blur, good flare resistance, price Cons: Perhaps the lack of stabilizer, hood not really stable Opinion: A truly superb goal, a bit like the whole new Sigma series. An excellent alternative to standard zooms, to always carry with you to have fun and play with open apertures in reportage and street photography. Its effective focal length on apsc of 45mm f2.0 makes it in practice a poor 50ino, more or less equal to the view of the human eye. Light and compact, silent and precise autofocus, used on Sony A5100 did not miss a shot, impressive sharpness already at 1.4 and blurred with very pleasant detachment when making close-ups and half-length portraits. A lens that for what it costs offers so much, also the reduced weight and compact size, make it a real companion for every outing and portraits even indoors. Too bad the lack of stabilizer, but with the new sensors stabilized in the room the problem does not arise. Highly recommended! sent on January 01, 2023 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Construction, sharpness, f2.8, small size, the used price Cons: Dial out of calibration distances Opinion: I took this fantastic lens used by a member of the forum, as new, with rossa.rnLa line first impression was very positive to the touch, well built and compact enough, the rings are precise and fluid, the lens hood is fixed and the big cap engages well with its meccanismo.rnPassando the practical test I noticed that the distance scale is not very precise, but focheggiando in live view with the magnification, the focus is precise and easy as other targets. rnL'ho immediately tried photographing skyscrapers in downtown Milan and was stunned by the clarity and three-dimensionality, also 14mm on full frame are great fun, offering a lot of possibilities. rnAprendo photos in lightroom you immediately notice distortion in the center, but just click on the Lens Profile and everything is resolved, at full aperture cartoon a bit ', but always be resolved easily. Sharpness instead always excellent even at 2.8 and pleasant blurry if you try buying ravvicinati.rnContentissimo effects, for me a lens essential that crea addiction. sent on February 21, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: zoom range, good stabilization and accurate and fast autofocus Cons: color aberration, distortion and vignetting obvious. good construction, but over time the barrel comes loose and drifting alone when turned upside down. Opinion: Back in 2008, at the time of the EOS 400D was a must and a great alternative to a 18-55 allora.rnSi were good deals on used, my copy was very sharp and gave me good photos, provided you fix raw color-fringe obvious and excessive distortion 17mm.rnL'ho also used on the 70D, but I preferred to sell it to move on anyway opinion materiale.rnRimango after 8 years if taken at a good price, it is a great all-rounder! sent on October 16, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Price, compact, fairly fast autofocus Cons: unpleasant to the touch plastic, a bit 'soft 1.8 and fairly "flat images" Opinion: I state that the use of APSC (70D) with all the limitations of the reduced format, but this 50 is convincing me not so much, if only it were not for the price of the new truly affordable (paid back 114 euro) .rnEro too used well with Sigma Article 18-35 and 85 1.8, I thought to find a good compromise, but it really is true that you get what you pay for! rnLe images plus I find them pretty flat, I also have a 24 pancakes which I consider the best in everything, even plastic as well more pleasant to tatto.rnComunque not say is to throw away, only to be fixed, I thought it was better to TA for good pictures, but perhaps for this price you can not ask for more. rnPer now half satisfied. sent on April 26, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Light, crisp, comfortable zoom range and sufficiently bright Cons: Diaphragm "only" 6-blade, not including lens hood and very cumbersome Opinion: Use this lens for almost a year on 70D, got it used with lens hood and I'm really soddisfatto.rnVenivo by a Sigma 8-16 flawed and I think it changed with Canon has been a significant jump in quality and versatilità.rnAdoro travel with a lens Lightweight, with a convenient focal length and with the possibility of mounting a filter nd fun when I want long exposures even giorno.rnL'unica flaw is in my opinion the old 6-blade diaphragm, in fact backlight does a nice sunburst as other wide-angle lenses .rnSarebbe a nice update with new constant aperture diaphragm and ... sent on December 09, 2015 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Excellent construction, rings very accurate and robust, impressive sharpness even at f1.8, including a kit handy bag. Cons: 850 grams are not few, maybe hike a bit 'limited. Opinion: I recently the aforementioned goal and after it hooked to my 70D I discovered that the focus was slightly out of calibration, but no matter, the micro in the room I arranged everything in 20 minutes. I began to take portraits and photos ambientati evening, the quality is crazy, sharpness by fear since f1.8, even better 85 1.8 I have. rnAltro value is the build quality: solid, solid and pleasant to the touch, some parts are even metallo.rnL'autofocus is quick, a little lower compared to a usm, but to make quieter, so great for video.rnLa sore point is the weight that unfortunately in the long run is felt, even the zoom range is a bit 'limited to make a good tuttofare.rnLo blurry and three-dimensionality are of high standard, but it depends on how far you take the picture from the subject, Unfortunately, we always talk about APSC machine, then the separation of the first floor will never be like that of a sensor FF.rnHo noticed thata good macro capabilities, so they could go out good shots remote ravvicinata.rnIn conclusion are satisfied, but unfortunately its Use with any I see a little 'limited opportunities for photos in interiors and portraits settled, perhaps as travel optics would be awkward, however, APSC to believe that offer the best quality you can averer.rnVoto 9.5! rn sent on September 01, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Small, lightweight, simple, cheap and quality Cons: For amateur use against any Opinion: Bought at 20 euro for almost always take it around, holding no problem my 70D with 10-22. Locking system very simple and functional, clearly not a professional tripod that plant in the ground in any circumstances, but for amateur use is more than valido.rnPer me is a must have! sent on February 25, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Lightweight, well built, fast and silent AF, very sharp even at f2.8, resistance to flare Cons: It looks like a toy, and people will think you're poor photographers Opinion: Bought as optical street and handyman to be coupled to the 70D, the result was amazing! RnLe small size, the focal length of the right to APSC, make that my 70D is a pleasure to use it in every situation, without compromising image quality as Indeed, this 24 stm is very sharp, creative and resistant to flare in an exceptional way. rnSi carries around very well and soon you will regret not taking it prima.rnPrezzo affordable, must-have! sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: solid construction, complete set of everything, barrel does not extend, sharpness, angle of view, af fast and zero distortion Cons: ridiculous front cap, does not mount filters, flare Opinion: Goal very well made, solid and fun to use. The focal length of 8mm offers really a look at prospects impossible ensuring no distortion, fast and precise autofocus then dials give much sense of quality. Excellent sharpness entire frame provided you close enough, whereas at full aperture is shown on the edges of the clear limits of a corner so driven. But the thing that I do not tolerate is the insane system of the front cap, very easy to miss because it does not present any engagement, I had to put small pieces of electrical tape to block the exit from the barrel. Also reflected little resistance to flare in strong direct light, then view the front aspherical lens, you can not mount filtri.rnComunque with its 8mm, is the only of its kind, recommended. sent on February 11, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
