|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lo_straniero www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lo_straniero  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XC 35mm f/2 Pros: small cheap af fast crisp Cons: plastic but for 200€ Opinion: small cheap sharp fast af tried on the xt3 I use to play and I found myself very well, try optical atre like the 23mm 1.4 but I didn't like I go against the current but in my opinion this lens is the best fuji lens. I can't wait to try even the little brother 18mm f2, I recommend this lens to everyone. sent on February 19, 2021 |
 | Irix 11mm f/4.0 Pros: 11mm on FF, good sharpness in the center, aesthetics, very honest price. Cons: Slightly poor material, uncertain focus ring, some patterns are not sharp. Opinion: Taken to play a bit since I am a fan of ultra wide-angle optics, and I use it in wedding as well as landscapes and architecture, I'm from sigma 12-24 art that has a fixed quality while this irix is ??acceptable but you have to work in Post.rn I was lucky to test 3 optics and I took that sharper then eye. For its price I would recommend it, otherwise if you have the money for canon good for you: PrnYouness sent on August 29, 2017 |
 | Sigma SD Quattro Pros: Sharpness, Body, Quality material, sensor unbeatable 100iso, jpeg files, Cost, and monitor settings as keys etc. Cons: No one except for high iso Opinion: I had this machine in a too hectic period in my life, but I could appreciate all its advantages as "digital film" rninfatti is where we must focus piu..questa machine does not forgive mistakes, and needs a certain light. rnSe must have the balls before Techniques able to exploit her gorgeous sensore.In study his honors but also perhaps with external lights contrastate.rnIo recommend it only for those who are passionate but bored by the new cameras without carattere.rnSe me is another update again review;) sent on February 10, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark IV Pros: Reliability, extraordinary quality of raw, responsive and precise autofocus, touch screen GPS and WiFi, Cromie, perfect white balance, Video (check carefully) but is a camera not a video camera. Cons: the cost but for me it is worth them all, the video compared to sony but who wants to make videos and photos not definitely does not choose the 5d IV. I might have preferred the overhead screen. Opinion: Here I am talking about this reflex boys "massacred" by many users MrGreen rnrnPremessa: this post is just a personal opinion and technical of the undersigned not * (* canonist convinced: D) rnrnHo retired the 5D II and some optical and currently use is the 5d III that the newcomer from a few days 5d IV. rnIeri finally I could test on the battlefield the 5d IV on the occasion of a marriage, and now hot I can give you some judgment that I hope will be helpful. rnPrima important thing is that I have a body already been run, so I did not have to learn anything new to take my hand and this is important because in the report need to be dynamic and not static. In this canon I enjoyed the touch monitor that allowed me to shoot from above and points of view more awkward to frame viewfinder, although he used a fixed-aperture has never missed a shot in this mode. rnUn'altra something important and significant thing is the white balance, much more natural than the III. Besides that I found a perfect autofocus, (that of 5dIII for me was already very good) in 5dIV is incredibly improved Eeeek !!! I'm not a technical and often use the Af in the center but I felt better accuracy. Other improvements are for my personal taste, the colors Cool and more natural colors that can "alter" at will on Ps. rnOvviamente the ISO seal and dynamic range are impressive but you already know. For the barrage I could not test because they are against too many files in marriages but I do not think there is much difference between the III and Iv (we them) rnPassiamo the post production side. Here I saw another significant improvement and it denotes that canon has worked well on this new very elastic sensor. Finally seal the iso is remarkable and the colors and the colors maintain a good performance. rnDetto in jargon and always according to my personal opinion, the raw file has a "flat" style so you can work in a much more personalized and this for me & egrAve; remarkable. rnPer the video side - WiFi - GPS - Dual pixels etc. I have not tried it yet but will update. rnAltre things at the moment :) rnrnConcludo not occur to me that to judge a car you need to go on the field at least a day instead of the "heard" say, or do a test on a tripod in your room with its iso crop and the like crap, this work very technical and it should be left to professionals. rnrnCanon did not disappoint me and for me it is worth every penny, but beware this conclusion is only personal and for my needs, I have calculated very carefully before making this major investment. rnrnYouness sent on December 18, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM Pros: Nature, bokeh, sharpness, strength, weight, hood, bright. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I recently this perspective that replaced the brother 1.8. I'm very pleased I found it used and I took advantage because of the price. I find it an optical character and difficult to tame for this I like. Initially it was not love at first sight but then calmly proved to live up to my expectations. I would only recommend for those who are technically prepared because you are likely to make mistakes the fire. rnYouness sent on May 22, 2016 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Clarity, cost, weight, accessories, stabilized Cons: No only the diaphragm reaches maximum f22 Opinion: Excellent lens with an honest cost. It has a color rendering scream. The colors are vivid and the focus is creamy. Already 2.8 is magnificent. It has nothing to envy against the Canon 100mm. The only flaw I found out later and that only closed f22 instead of f32 clearly details are almost useless. On my site you will find the adv work I've done with this fantastic lens. rnwww.younesstaouil.com sent on April 28, 2016 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: All, a perfect lens and has a fair cost. Cons: Anything Opinion: It is now more than a year that I have this 50mm and are very pleased with this fantastic lens. Sharp and bright, and fast and accurate autofocus. We must hold on these optics are born perfect because I've read mixed reviews. The council also a reportage and portraits half-length onwards. In my portfolio you will find some pictures taken with this lens. Taouil Youness sent on April 08, 2016 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Versatile, long-lived, image quality, dual card, af super, solid, always clean sensor, good burst, silent ,. Cons: Video does not match its competitors, limited dynamic range due to the noise risk. Opinion: After 3 years of professional use I can say that it is a machine lady. Impeccable and not bat an eyelid. Reliable and fast. Only flaw is the video of little quality and outdated compared to competitors. The council despite being born five years ago remains a very valid machine photographically. Taouil Youness sent on April 08, 2016 |
 | Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Construction blurred colors Cons: Focus inconsistent, Sharpness good but not like the 50mm art Opinion: After much research on this point, and after the excellent feedback of 50mm art I decided to take this 24mm 1.4 artrnma unfortunately right now I noticed a focus inconsistent ... Basically they pecked 5 of 10 shots and 5 and no I speak diaphragm open because that's why I've spent more than 700 € then not experience the issue than usual known front / back focus but a focus inconsistent sometimes the guesses very well sometimes no.E for a professional like me I can not afford to make mistakes like this and I decided to give it back. rnrnYouness Taouil sent on May 28, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
