|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alfonso Alfieri www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlfonsoAlfieri  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic S1 Pros: Construction, Spectacular Photo File, Auto-focus improved a lot with the new firmware 1.7 especially in video, body, reliability, the viewfinder is a fairy tale Cons: Maybe the battery life Opinion: My opinion will be long, also because those who know me have tried them all but, for three years now I have decided to stop and address a product specific to my video and photographic needs. To say that I am a former owner of GH4 and GH5 spectacular machines for video, for a very short time I owned S1H and here it is useless to talk about it but I took it off because my biggest problem is that being a photographer and videomaker I never went to invest in two machine bodies, until the day I decided to sell everything and buy a machina that would allow me to have some excellent photos , in itself of excellent performance and that included a good video compartment, and so I move on to Fuji X-T3 and X-T4. Today for my future projects I am thinking of buying a machine that has a Cine profile and therefore I will project myself towards Blackmagic but in the meantime the bee-c sensor had to be tightened to me given my decision and anyway until the time of purchase I always need a machine that allows me to make videos of a certain level . I was not confident precisely because coming from S1H and , testing the fact that the self-focus both video and photo was scarce I was a little reluctant, but the moment I learned that everything was solved and improved to the great with the advent of the S5 on the market or made the step. I purchased this machine and immediately updated the firmware to version 1.7 is I have to say that now it has no rivals, the photo file is spectacular and of great quality, I bought it with the 24-105 and the new 85 f1.8 " and that we talk about it to do " the video sector is not really that of GH5 nor even that of S1H " logical " but with the V-log installed kids there is little to do , Panasonic in the Video world has always loved its users giving a product that allows you to create things that other brands dream of, I tried them all but here is a whole other planet and we do not talk about it now with a FF sensor but then, the 24-105 to f4 a crazy blur and a quality to sell and envy. I will certainly take Blackmagic but it is even more certain that I will take another S1 for my kit.. It is to buy absolutely sent on February 03, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-T3 Pros: Detail, Image Quality, Colorimetry, Ergonomics, 4K 60p Fullhd pariah to fullHD etc... Etc... Cons: Nobody Opinion: To say that I bought the machine for my video productions, very convinced that Fuji could land in the industry already from X-T2 but I had GH5 in my hands . I stress that ... there are many that define that or this best machine to make videos but in many machines, like the Sony video always remains and only an option, already from the fact that, if you compare the video features of Sony are all the same but ... logically Sony has on the market FS5 and Fs7II and can not give you to 1999 Euro a machine that does you the same thing but... let's set aside the Sonys. Lover of Gh5 I have always called it the most pushed machine in the videographic sector on the market and basically it is but... until I had X-T3 in my hands and everything changed. Of detail and image quality higher than Gh5 absolutely , the Colorimetry absolutely superior , F-Log much more manageable than the V-Log "I liked the V-Log more as it behaved on gh4, the stabilizer I can not care less , excellent durability of the battery , nice that I can already choose between 50 or 60p without enabling ne PAL or NTSC nice sta thing. Beautiful to manage the Dynamic Range at percentages something that is not in GH5 and above all an impeccable autofocus system , perhaps the strength of Sony but today with X-T3 there is to fight. Photographically will come the day that I will try but I think it will not disappoint me ... it is physiological and therefore ... Let's say that Fuji X-T3 and even in certain situations at GH5s and in certain equals to GH5 , I will look forward to X-T4 and Gh5 always remains a great choice in place of Fuji ... The features of the machine ... are astounding and that is everything else that remains. For friends Videomaker is something to try , it will make you afraid only at the beginning the management of the machines but then from the result you can not stay anymore without ... Guaranteed. Here I review my review, I declare that I made the switch to Fuji also photographically When the purchase I promised not to photograph and if it had happened I would never post produced the file, in the full knowledge that if I did I would immediately made the switch from Canon to fuji and so it was. At the first I flanked him a second with optics 18-55 - 56f1.2 - 35f1.4 and instead of a canvas like the 50-140 hearing about this 80 2.8 macro ois bought the one with cash back they also returned 350Euro because purchased new. What to tell you, love at first click, pasta and colormetry not common, detail present taking into account my optics, lightning-fast and impeccable car focus on the burst with af-c . sent on January 13, 2019 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: Construction, sharpness, AF weight Cons: Nobody Opinion: I bought this optics a long time ago for video and did not take even a picture then I gave it away, today I felt the need for a fixed lens and I had projected towards 50 Art but then a friend had for sale this version. Honestly I got to try it before buying it and I was immediately amazed by its quality and especially by the strong detail at F 1.4. The precise and fast AF, the weight content that tends to a strong balance of the machine, faithful colors and excellent construction, also presents very imposing mounted on the machine being a 77mm and with the hood is also more charming and ritrovandolo me I regret having it sold then but happy to re-have it bought today.. sent on May 04, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: Ergonomics, maneuverability, billing, practice, ISO, detail Cons: only the lack of stabilization and in the opinion I explain why Opinion: I am a Canonist having already supplied my beloved 6D, coming from aps-c canon 7D and 80D, I wanted a second body just to avoid the disassembly and replacement of optics and then, my first opinion was to take a 5D mkII but I gave up because? many sell it for 18 carat gold who 700 or even 800 euro 950 and I honestly with a budget from 700 to 950 I would have taken another 6D and not a museum car as well as out of production since 2012 but no more talk .rnI have been always attracted to the X-T2 and the thought of switching completely to Fuji always touched me but ... on the one hand undecided so I make this choice, especially to understand and know the car, I buy the X-T20.rnVi I say ... the first shot I was shocked, reporting the file in post, there is everything that must have a file out of a professional or semi-professional photo camera, I'm not here to list everything but, despite being an APS- c creates an amazing file. I made a second choice though !!!! to couple it with otvintage adapters with adapters (this is the reason for the lack of stabilization but not a big problem) and not for system optics and with ... a Yashika 50 f1.7 and a Nikon Ai-s 85 f2 and now I'm looking of a 24 or 16mm always vintage ..rnRagazzi .. recommend the purchase strongly and in all respects a second camera body ... and if the first goes in assistance and worthy to take his place. sent on December 18, 2017 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Construction - f1.8 - sharpness from 18 to 35 - true class A (rt) Cons: nobody Opinion: I regained this glimpse after selling it (Min .... ta) to move to bodies that I have been photographed and Video-graphically disappointed. I bought it for my gh4 but photographed with my 7D (including the one re-purchased used a real deal at 1000 shots), to say that I now also have a 80D, photographed together I have never disappointed the Sigma not I've never been hit by a shot and honestly I'm one of those who have never been afraid of the lack of stabilizer on the optics. Exceptional photo quality, I have now bought it again because I also bought GH5 and it is guaranteed, gh5 with metabones and 18-35 is a winning co-lead in video. More in the 'I will also buy the 20mm f1.4 which in video I was very satisfied, I do not know in photography but I will buy it. RnIt does not have to say much just look at the galleries to realize what it is, for those who use Aps-c bodies, for photos in general, even for events is an optic to keep bossCa aperta .... rnAcquistatelaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sent on August 10, 2017 |
 | Canon 80D Pros: Sharpness, Ergonomics, Colorimetry, and Enamy Dynamic Range you have an 80D in your hands but it's as if I had a top-of-the-range, 1080p 60fps, super-precise and fast AF-c Cons: On a set I realize that the machine registers in All-I just a 1080p at 25 and 24 fps and maybe the double slot but that does not bother me Opinion: I bought this machine to support a damage from Sony and then buy a FF in the future or as soon as possible, I bought it for photography but I found myself testing it in Video at a ceremony with Cinestyle installed coupled to my GH5, I say I have taken to some of the fabulous pictures, not to compare with GH5 but I'm telling you a wonderful, dynamic range in crazy video, a detail not to envy Sony a6500 and a7sII, machines I already tested and sent to c ...., a facility to manage the menu on the scene without any problems I shot with a 17-55 f2.8 and with a 35 f1.4 sigma but by my wonder I would not stop seeing and reviewing the scene. I shot with Canon 24-105 L (A series L to go off) and I had a 6D with me with a friend with 24-70 Tamron and I tell you both of them compare the photographic result there is no absolute difference, a quality frightened . I left Canon long ago videotaped but around I heard voices of this machine that Canon had improved both the 1080p and 24.2 mpx in the picture therethey all are . The autofocus is accurate both with USM optics and I do not imagine with STM optics the detail in the video is not 6D in 5D mkIII (I do not know that of 5D mak IV) but today i say ... Canon 80D and a great second camera body A wider angle (which I now buy right now ... Tamron 10-24 latest version) and with the same excellent video production ... video coupled with the new 6D mkII will have big but big results ... Buy it right away .. sent on July 13, 2017 |
 | Sony A99 II Pros: 3.400 euros of car to have an unsolvable problem .... pusccccccc .... sony must do only the Washers Cons: In Video, Autofocus continues to automate values ??(Diaphragm and Shutter Time) but is not a big problem but the biggest problem is the malfunction of the tropicalization system. Opinion: I bought this photo camera but above all for my videos, all right until during an exterior training the machine turns off and reboots it indicates the icon of overheating so I think it has the same problem as previous ones (No a6500 but .. A6300 - a7s - a7sii and a7rii) that tot min. Of 4k recording the sensor overheated by sending the protector to the car but ... by doing the tests I found that the one of the a99II the problem is more serious .rnIn the interior where the ambient temperature is not excessive the machine is in 4k to 29.30 Min registers without any problems and bursts without problems but when it is used in the outside with high temperature and no bursts of bursts and takes videos in 4k 40sec - 1.20min. A couple already reports overheating, I did a test from my retailer with my own and with a new one from the showcase and they both found the same problem so .rnThe car has a system of tropicalization not working this explains that sony has not yet put out An update of the same because prYou probably want to put it out of production because there can not be any updated firmware that can fix the problem, a9 one month since its release is already public update while a99II no then .... rnAVVISO totally disapprove the purchase I'm returning it And since this is a serious sony problem leaving the brand both photographed and videographed sent on May 09, 2017 |
 | Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro Pros: Construction, Durability, great performance in a compact copro, Details, Glamor in its physicality Cons: Do not place or see no problem in previous reviews but I noticed that ... in a certain low light conditions is hard to focus Opinion: Rest fascinated by its solidity and from its well-made construction. I made some shots and I was surprised the picture quality as well as detailed and great blur, very muffled and at the same time soft, knowing him well and making us believe their approach to get us out of the beautiful portrait photos, but now maybe having .. .dico ... maybe some macro photos I can ... so much for. I was torn between 85 and 150 at the end I am decided and took the 150, to be noted NIKON also because 85 1.8 - 60 1.8 and 50 g f1.4 Nikon suffer too much of chromatic aberrations instead the sigma occurs very precise on this point. My has no manufacturing defect, especially the factor ring ..funziona perfectly and for the moment for what I want in the hands highly recommend it. sent on March 09, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Sharpness - Super fast and silent AF - construction already 'having hands immediately feels his professionalism' Cons: My opinion there are but for one thing ... "Stabilization" Opinion: I Bought this lens a week ago 'used, paid 680 Euro lens but really immaculate, as it should be treated by a professional, I did not have a Tele and frankly my Budget statement does not throw me on the Canon 70-200 f2.8 is II ( too expensive), for the moment, and then, including reviews and forum ... they sat down in front of me these three lenses (Tamron 70-200 f2.8 Di LD - Tamron 70-200 f2.8 Di VC USD - Canon 70 -200 f2.8 L USM) Structural looking beautiful all three but then I asked the question ... "which of the three? ignores that there are three lenses in really nice because then I found myself a 'moment to try them, then, all three but '... !!!! .... Pero ... !! ... taking into account that: On Juza Canon 70-200 is the first version, it says little sharp ... taking into account that 'Tamron is and is not there a big difference in price and for the price difference I was deciding to take Di LD, and I had decided, by decision but then came the question, "but if I have to keep a Tele not stabilized, that with the proper knowledge, you can cmq be the best, then I'll take the non-IS Canon !!! Cmq is a Canon L-series. To be noted that a friend of mine Is having the 1st vers. , Then I am decided to take the 70-200 and is not comparing them I can testify that the only difference for me is the lack of stabilization and with a steady hand or tripod or mono-foot with the L series is not you can 'have also much, much more '... so for enthusiasts and professionals and non-Canon 70-200 f2.8 L USM highly recommended .... sent on October 04, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
