|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bigisbetter www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bigisbetter  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Pentax K-1 Pros: image quality, robustness, stabilized sensor, many useful features, rapport quality / price Cons: Fund further improved AF in AF-C Opinion: I'm no reviewer then those that will read are simple impressions of a user of this camera body. For those who already know Pentax building is typical of Pentax top of the range, that is, a body robust machine, designed to withstand even the most severe conditions, heavy tropical conditions. Bodies with this level of robustness in Canon and Nikon are found only in the top gamma.rnLe size bodies are compact enough to be a full-frame, even if the weight is not just a feather (we are around kg.). The viewfinder is large and bright, with 100% coverage of the frame. There are many buttons and dials, with more extensive customization. Organizing the machine according to their needs becomes extremely uncommon to have to then access the individual menù.rnDisponibili dual slot for SD cards, Wi-Fi and integrated GPS. The latter, combined with the stabilized sensor, allows the use of an integrated "ASTROTRACER" function that allows shots up around 5minutes of exposure without ghosting on stelle.rnUna of the functions of this machine body on which much has been said, and also often inappropriately, is the pixel-shift. This function has the aim to give a much more accurate color reproduction. To do this it uses the sensor stabilization technology to take four images where each is moved by 1 pixel sensor to cover the 4 colors that make up each cell of the Bayer filter. In this way the information on the color no longer takes place by interpolation with the neighboring cells but is formed with precision by the acquisition of the color for the four pixels of each cell. This is the reason why the pixel-shift has been implemented. For side effects you are bringing even lower noise and greater richness of detail. But these are precisely side effects and is wrong to confuse them with the purpose for which this function exists. The use of the pixel-shift, to maximize the result, plans to use the FotocamIt was on a tripod and shoot still subjects; where this is not possible the internal sw test machine to process the parts that are "moved" by pulling them from one of individual frames, but the result may not always be satisfactory. In these cases, however, it is strongly recommended that you use to process the sw owner of Pentax, which provides the pixel-shift significantly better results compared to other development software such as LR or C1. Where you can successfully apply the pixel-shift results are notevolissimi.rnIl sensor it is the excellent 36-megapixel Sony origin without AA filter in a revised and updated version for Pentax, and is an excellent sensor as both resolution and as a dynamic range. Even in my opinion the noise is more than satisfactory and there are no problems shooting in low light situations. Still subjects of further help to contain the blur comes stabilizer 5 next generation axes, very efficace.rnLa Investments valued myion segment AF inevitably affected the use that I do; no extreme sports photographer will birdlife, so I find the more than satisfactory AF. In AF-S it is fast, responsive and precise, even in low light; AF-C for subjects in normal movement, tiny animals like birds and erratic, it seems to me that he did not notice male.rnUltima cable, the newly developed swivel LCD monitor, which can be tilted to achieve the desired angle horizontally , vertically or diagonally in one motion and without the center of the monitor is too decentralized to the optical axis of the objective to facilitate the positioning of the camera than desired into the scene, both when shooting freehand on tripods . I personally found it very utile.rnPer those old optical Pentax here manuals will return to use them with satisfaction, given that the attack Pentax has always remained the same and the camera body still provides confirmation reached set-outdooco also with manual lenses (which obviously become stabilized due to the stabilization on the sensor) .rnLa my overall rating is therefore very positive, it is a machine body with professional features at an extremely price competitivo.rn sent on July 29, 2016 |
 | Pentax HD FA 28-105mm f/3.5-5.6 ED DC WR Pros: Global optical performance, weather sealing, weight, size Cons: Light, plastic construction (both however are known and appropriate for the price range). Opinion: I was pleasantly surprised by this view. This is the classic zoom "handyman" There is a bit 'in all systems, more "economic belt" and for this variable aperture. So it's definitely a lens suitable for those who did not need to light a view but prefer to have lower weights and dimensions. The tour covers a moderate wide-angle (28mm, it might have been preferable to get to 24mm as now many competitors offer) to a portrait tele (105mm). However the highlight of this lens in my opinion is very good optical performance a bit 'at all focal lengths, with no excessive distortion even at 28mm and a truly remarkable sharpness (the 36-megapixel sensor of K1 is quite severe in this direction). Also the yield on the edge is already good at full aperture and become good just stopping down. Having had in the past the classic 24-105mm f / 4 L of Canon I can say that this Pentax 28-105mm optically does much better. RNLA construction, although theyndo plastic, is very accurate and in any case gives a good impression of solidity beneath his fingers. Last positive note is that it is still a lens resistant to dust and moisture. Obviously this lens hood. sent on June 06, 2016 |
 | Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS Pros: Construction, sharpness, blur Cons: Cumbersome and moderately heavy Opinion: A lens "important" in many ways: expensive (always remains a "G" series of Sony), bulky and heavy enough. In practical use it is extremely versatile even outside the macro. Razor sharp and edgy already wide open, from center to edge, portraiture also reveals a blurred creamy and pleasant. The construction is excellent, the combined weight to my A7II is not so excessive as to make the system unbalanced (the size would suggest a greater weight). sent on July 29, 2015 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Sharpness, construction, color rendering, resistance to flare Cons: Weights and dimensions of slightly less than similar goal for SLR Opinion: Wide-angle zoom of excellent quality. Like all dedicated lenses system Full Frame E-Mount lens exhibits excellent resolution with a sharpness wide open to good and very good center to the edges, which further improves stopping down to the classic openings to photograph landscapes. The building is really convincing, as one would expect from Zeiss, the sliding rings and fluid at the right point. The color rendering is very good. The main defects (distortion, common to a zoom wide angle like this, aberrations and vignetting) can be easily corrected with the classic profile lens available in major raw converter, while the jpeg you can already do it in your room. For those who practice photography landscape is definitely a lens to have. sent on June 15, 2015 |
 | Pentax HD DA 21mm f/3.2 AL Limited Pros: Weight, size, construction, colors Cons: Missing tropicalization, made the edges uninspiring Opinion: Typical focal street, this view is not prompted a wide-angle (equivalent to 32mm on FF), not bright. Among its advantages an impeccable construction in aluminum, extremely reduced size and weight, a good optical performance (but limited other lenses are better) rnHa center very sharp and sin a little 'to the edges and needs to close the iris at least f / 5.6 to achieve a good yield even at the edges. Color and contrast are excellent, also good resistance to flare. sent on June 04, 2015 |
 | Pentax HD DA 70mm f/2.4 AL Limited Pros: Size, weight, optical performance, construction Cons: Missing tropicalization Opinion: Portrait lens of high quality and high-class (equivalent to 105mm on FF). Difficult to find major flaws. Impeccable construction in aluminum, extremely compact dimensions and weight ridiculous (just over 1 pound) .rnDal optically has made a quite impressive: very sharp wide open since become even slightly sharp closing the diaphragm. Distortion and aberrations virtually negligible, slight vignetting at full aperture. Bokeh generally pleasant with a good yield of the light fixtures. Another plus the presence of the hood integrato.rnPer who does portraits in the house perspective Pentax is definitely recommended. sent on June 04, 2015 |
 | Pentax HD DA 15mm f/4 ED AL Limited Pros: Size, weight, construction, built-in hood Cons: Missing tropicalization Opinion: A tiny angle that is well suited to landscape photography. It 'an f / 4 so not particularly bright, but in the landscape are usually employed diaphragms fairly closed to maximize sharpness and pdc. In terms of pure clarity this light gives their best between f / 5.6 and f / 8. At f / 4, the center is good but the edges are a bit 'soft, already at f / 5.6 the edges nettamente.rnBuoni improve colors and contrast. Even the resistance to flare is not bad. Overall, the optical performance, while not record-breaking, is ottima.rnI great merits of this view are building really excellent aluminum, tiny size, weighs less than 2 ounces, integrated retractable hood. The only drawback some 'inexplicable, even given the considerable price, is the lack of weather sealing, when Pentax provides tropicalised even plasticotti from 18-55mm kit. sent on June 04, 2015 |
 | Sony A7 II Pros: Stabilization, sensor, possibility of using optical and manual vintage, customization, tropicalization Cons: AF in low light, Battery Life Opinion: After using for about one year an A7 I switched to this new version. The quality in my opinion excellent sensor remains virtually the same, while improving ergonomics handle allows for more pronounced and the repositioning of the shutter button, the best construction in magnesium and large feature stabilizer 5-axis. Thanks to it for those using optical vintage will enjoy the benefits of stabilization (also useful in the viewfinder to focus when focus easily using the magnification) .rnIl camera body has a little 'the size of an old film camera, before it would reach size really bulky SLR current. E 'it increased weight of approximately 1 pound but it is still a moderately lightweight camera body. Excellent customization possibilities, very good in my opinion the electronic viewfinder and the good AF system, not lightning, but more than acceptable in most of situazioni.rnIl his strong point, combined with the optical quality as dedicated Zeiss, is hereity of image that can churn out. For those who can not give up the FF can be a good alternative to relieve some 'Kit (a good 30% in terms of weight and dimensions it brings home than a similar reflex FF). sent on June 03, 2015 |
 | Pentax K-5 IIs Pros: Sizes, weather sealing, the sensor stabilizer, construction, absence of AA filter, customization, value for money. Cons: It 'a Pentax, less marketable and less choice on second. Opinion: In my opinion one of the best APS-C in circulation. Its 16-megapixel Sony sensor fusion remains a perfectly balanced between resolution and overall performance, including high ISO. rnPentax offers very compact camera bodies with a very high quality construction. Magnesium body, tropicalization really effective, smaller burden, great chance to personalizzazione.rnIl sector AF seems reliable, with the central point manage to connect with precision, even in situations of very low luminosity. I do not pronounce on the ability of tracking because it is a genre that is not practical. Very good dynamic range and resilience especially in the shadows (so in scenes with high contrast display for better preserving the highlights and then recover the shadows). The yield at high ISO is at the top in the segment APS-C, and 6400 ISO there are still usable photos with good detail, unless of prints to huge sizes. rnTra the pluses would remember also the stabilizer on the sensor, effective enough, and the absence of AA filter che enhances clarity (at risk moire, but I so far I have not found) .rnConsiderazione personal combined with limited fixed un''ottima can become an alternative to the SLR mirrirless in terms of reduction of weight and dimensions (a kit reflex and 5 stationary in less than 1500 grams is not to be underestimated ....) sent on June 03, 2015 |
 | Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Weight; 7-blade rounded diaphragm; stabilization; bayonet metal; resistant to dust and moisture; hood included Cons: Optical quality discreet but consistent with being a zoom lens kit; plastic construction Opinion: Often there is some sort of "hate" towards the goals "kit" or "standard" forgetting to parameterise all on the approach that should be approaching these lenses, which obviously are not born to be "excellent" but to offer a decent quality / price ratio to use a little 'more disengaged the mezzo.rnL'ottica in question is a zoom "standard" for mirrorless Sony FF. Its use is not recommended with a sensor such as the 36mpx A7R, because it would too much to whip the limits of such a view (in fact, the Sony offers it in kit with A7R), while it may make sense combined to the sensors from 24mpx and 12 mpx.rnLa construction, while being in plastic (with metal attack), is good, inter alia resistant to dust and moisture; the weight is contained in less than 3 ounces; This is the stabilizer; the front lens does not rotate, and thenIt is usable with circular polarizers; of note is the presence of paraluce.rnLe optical performance is decent (better than the classic 18-55 for APS-C, for instance); distortion and vignetting present the wide angle (in jpeg automatically corrected on-board, easily correctable in the RAW profile through the lens), good sharpness in the center and the edges Scarsini wide open, it becomes high at the center and the edges good stopping down. For a classic landscape photos, for example, which closes the diaphragm, the performance is more than sufficient. Used a 70mm still it allows you to have a focus in discreet portraiture thanks to a 7-blade rounded diaphragm ensures that the points of light form circolare.rnSe think about maximizing the quality forget about this lens. If you need a practical goal, lightweight, outputs a bit 'more disengaged with your mirrorless Sony FF, the 28-70mm in question can be a good choice. sent on June 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
