|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Charley www.juzaphoto.com/p/Charley  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM Pros: overall quality, construction, zoom range, excellent sharpness. Cons: Maybe a little 'dark, given that part of virtually F4. Opinion: I got to try a little 'in all circumstances, given that own it for a while'. and it has always behaved well. AF fast, and sharpness rather good, in particular up to about 70, but also to 100 120, closed to f8, is equally valid In comparison to all optical from Kit, is certainly a substantial improvement. More 'has an excursion, which allows you to exit without any other. Meanwhile I have tested also various 18-200, but when I noticed that, it gave me more 'to this particular 125 to 200 others, well, I always come back to prefer this. sent on February 08, 2017 |
 | Sony DT 55-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 Pros: Compact and lightweight. Excellent sharpness. It does not suffer from flare and chromatic aberrations. Cons: Part 4.5, so a little 'dark. But we must 'consider, that are 4.5 up to about 130 focal, then, it is not so bad. Opinion: After trying various 70-300, from the most 'cost, type the Tamron and Sigma APO I had arrived at the Tamron 70-300 VC USD, and felt that, without having to spend a fortune to have reached a good result. But there was one problem, the weight and size of the Tamron, forced me too often ... leave it at home, so much so that in the end I decided to give it away. Meanwhile, in the meantime, I found one of those opportunities that you can not let it go, and I found myself at home the aforementioned Sony 55-300. I immediately noticed the compactness and lightness, then I went out to do all the same tests that usually do with a goal, the same subjects at different distances, at different apertures, so it can then make direct comparisons on the PC. And I have seen, that Sony was also higher than the Tamron VC, then, to remain even sharp enough at maximum extension (test done on the bells of a church tower to 500 meters away!). I seemed to be born a second time, being able to see much of the details, I had not seen before !. For me, at the level of "price-performance";, He is unrivaled. In addition ', I is in a small bag-kit, along with everything else (only one SLT A58 with Sigma 18-125 HSM, spare battery and little else for a total of about 2 pounds, including the bag) I can take it always with me, on every occasion. Yet, before 30 years with Nikon, and then for three years with Sony, the goals, I've had and tested ... really a lot !! sent on February 08, 2017 |
 | Patona NP-FW50 Pros: True quality-price ratio excellent, appropriate duration, and held the office for weeks without problems. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Having already had other experiences with the brand, I have always enjoyed it and then, when I took the Sony mirrorless, I immediately started looking for the best price for this NP FW50, combined with the charger, usable both at home with the normal plug that car with the cigarette lighter supplied, and all at little more 'than 20 Euros !. (To consider that Sony provides only a battery charger that recharges the battery inserted in the camera body). Well, it has the length of the original, if not more ', is fully compatible ,, sent on November 08, 2015 |
 | Sony E 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Good quality construction, stabilization, light weight and size. Cons: As already said, to be a lens from kits, nobody Opinion: I was used to plasticotto Nikon and be found to handle this, he immediately gave a pleasant impression. both in terms of quality of construction and materials, and the quality of stabilization, much more 'quick to intervene, and really good. with regard to optical quality to work as they should, it needs to be closed a bit ', at least f5.6-8 to wide angle, and f11 to 55mm, but produces excellent file, very sharp, and I did not find differences at the level of colors, and contrast, always by comparison with the Nikon I had. Whereas it is from an economic kit, one can not 'just complain !! sent on November 06, 2015 |
 | Sony A3000 Pros: Compact and lightweight, excellent photo quality, easy to use and manage, a few buttons, but very practical, and not least, real movies as it should. Cons: The viewfinder, which frankly could be better, and the AF, which is certainly not that of a good SLR, but then, I see no other obvious flaws. Opinion: After 35 years of "Nikonismo," I'm tired of having to go out every time with a bag rather cumbersome and over 3kili and a half in weight. I decided to sell everything, and I started looking for something more 'handy, light, type mirrorless, to be clear I was also willing to accept a lower quality camera, just to have a layette that was almost "pocket", or just more '. Wandering through malls, I came across this model was on offer, less than 400 Euros all the kit, including: Body + 18-55mm stabilized, + 55-210, well stabilized, + a 16gb sd card, + his bag which contained the original Sony all !!. I ran home to look a bit 'of information on the net, and after an hour I was at the mall to pick !. What can I say, I have not deteriorated in quality, indeed !!!, piu'economico Although clearly the model of the house and now also already out of production, they have been so pleasantly impressed, not avrei I never thought possible. I, who for so many only saw Nikon, I had to accept the fact, that other, not to be outdone, and indeed, for certain things, can do even better, and "weigh three times less," Kg. 1, 2 including the stock exchange, it is always a pleasure to carry it behind. sent on November 06, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Pros: Excellent from all points of view. Before I had the "usual 18-105", and I must say, that in a few shots, I noticed a clear improvement, in terms of sharpness, speed, and accuracy of focus. I would also add the fact that it makes very good even wide open, and just get to F6.3 or 7.1 for maximum, even at 140. VR. moreover, engages quickly, even when I tried it (!) with a kenko 1.4 tc Pro300, and I was literally amazed at how "get along"!!!!!. Cons: For now, no Opinion: In my opinion, it is one of the best all-rounder objectives, superior even to the 18-200, which I got to try for a short period. I, not having many opportunities to travel, I usually do my tests, in the vicinity of the house, in a park, and always the same things, a bell tower, the eaves of the building in front of a house on the hill, etc ... . And I have noticed that with this goal, even zooming in, I could see, "details never noticed before," not even in the same photos taken with the 18-200, and ... that's incredible, even with the 55-300! !!. What can I say, admit that I'm excited about this 18-140 vr, is the minimum. I did find the will to "photograph"!!!! sent on June 07, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
