|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Danno_80 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Danno_80  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM Pros: Sharpness, lightness, focal length, stabilization and price Cons: Speed maf tracking, plastic, no hood Opinion: Bought on the advice of a friend I was struck by its sharpness and lightness, I'm using it on R7, for now with the little use I did I hope I have to take the hand to a focal so pushed, so much so that to chase subjects in flight are more times than in focusing are lost, obviously it is not an L series that when it hooks you no longer give up the subject but the price difference answers every question, however the limiter at 20mt from a small hand. In the most stationary subjects it behaves like PRO I managed to photograph a passerine in a hedge at 1/160 ISO 1600 because of the little light without shake, obviously it also takes a bit of luck and a good burst. I recommend trying it I was skeptical and fortunately I trusted sent on April 17, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 600mm f/4 L USM Pros: 600mm f4, af responsive, razor sharp lens (if calibrated to the Service or with micro adjustment) Cons: Heavy, non-tropical conditions, multiplied 2x does not focus perfectly except in Live view.rnMinima distance of 6m maf Opinion: I bought recently and I'm very satisfied, rnPesa a bang but I have not turned back to do some shooting on the fly obviously with very quickly, rnRegge well 1.4x extender III, the 2x is used for emergencies and obviously on stable support or tripod. rnSoffre backlighting but it is a perfectly normal thing .rnHo tried some shots without a hood because of small slits and I noticed that just a poor light wire to throw away the shot, so better keep it montato.rnMeglio accompany it with a zoom handyman since its minimum distance is maf 6mt.rn sent on May 28, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Sharpness wide open, weather sealing, minimum distance maf, hood, very very good sharpness with 1.4x mk3 and especially great stabilizer Cons: I would say the price but you have to try it to judge Opinion: I use it for about a year and it is a satisfaction after the other, crystal clear already at f5.6, and f8 with 1.4x MKIII becomes even there is already clear without having to close, which also means fantastico.Perfetto other genres other than wildlife and bird life, I do not think has defects, the comparison with the old 100 400 is to be avoided, are two totally different things, the only thing that unites them and the minimum aperture and the canon brand, without detracting from the old 100 400 that if calibrated to perfection was and is still a slow ottimissima sent on April 20, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
