|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Patrick.Morini www.juzaphoto.com/p/Patrick.Morini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon Adattatore Control Ring Canon EF/Canon RF Pros: Flawless operation Cons: Cost Opinion: Adapter that works excellently. I use this model with programmable bezel and I chose it over the smooth one. For my way of photographing the ring it did not bring me any benefit (I thought it was a nice comfort and I chose it for this reason), indeed, sometimes I had to deactivate it. On the ring I inserted the iris control and I often happen to take against handling the machine and then change its value, then finding myself with an incorrect diaphragm. For those who think it may be useful to have the ring can opt for this with adapter ring, otherwise I highly recommend the smooth one that costs half. sent on October 21, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X100V Pros: Beautiful, Excellent JPG Files, Build Quality, AF and Burst Cons: Battery life, lack of supplied charger, ISO choice ring, tripod thread Opinion: I start immediately by saying why I chose this compact. I come from FF Canon kit (which I keep) and compact Fuji (xf10) which I use when hiking. This is oriented because I wanted a serious compact, with jpg ready. The classic tip and level snap. Here I found what I was looking for. The XTRANS sensor of this compact APS-C is something exceptional. The ability not to have the low-pass filter thanks to this sensor guarantees really rich images of detail. The various film simulations that are also customizable allow you to have many color stamps for the images and give a mood to jpgs, to my taste, really great. Aesthetics of the beautiful machine and in my opinion really satisfying use experience. The AF is superb and hooks very well. The 11fps burst is even too much for this type of machine (it can reach 30 fps with electronic shutter). The mechanical shutter is central, so never any problem with flash synchros. Unfortunately, there is no shortage of downsides. The battery life is really poor. Using the optical, not digital, viewfinder, I find it difficult to overcome 350 shots with a charge. In addition, the lack of chargers forces you to leave the machine stationary to have to charge the battery in the car. Another negative aspect is the ISO ring that I consider functional, but in the choice of the various sensitivities there is no shot between one and the other. It necessarily forces you to have to look well at which to set and "center" the right sensitivity. The tripod thread is placed very close to the battery and sd card door. If a quick tripod plate is mounted, to remove battery and board you need to disassemble it all the time. It was enough to place the thread a few inches away. Overall it is an amazing machine and apart from the price a little high, I consider it the best in that category (or perhaps the only one, discarding SONY and LEICA with FF at a cost of 4/5 times this) sent on October 27, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm XF10 Pros: Compact, APS-C sensor, honest cost, excellent finishes Cons: Lack of optical viewfinder Opinion: I recently purchased from a forum user This "small" Fuji. Socket for light outputs without sacrificing the quality of the FF. I wanted something discreet, light, but had the right potential. This Fuji turned out to be such. As far as I am concerned the files are very nice and the ISO tightness is equal/higher than the Canon APS-C. The optics is a 28 equivalent with diaphragm 2.8. Even at maximum opening it is fully usable. The AF I find it good, in line with what is the stamp of the machine. Spectacular instant mode. It is set at 2 meters or 5 meters, pressing a single button. Then it is self-focused with infinite focus. It makes the machine a bit and snaps, without worrying about the fire. Personally I miss the optical viewfinder. The lack forces you to shoot by looking at the display, increasing the risk of micro-blur with slow times. Also you lose a little the magic of the shot. Overall I consider it excellent especially related to price/performance and portability. sent on December 29, 2018 |
 | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: AF; Gust, Robustness, Tropicalization, Battery life. Cons: LCD screen a bit dated Opinion: For me it is an excellent machine. The quality of the complexion is exceptional and also the APS-H sensor from one hand to approach the soggetto.rnIl multiplication factor of 1.3 is neither fish nor fowl, but I think that for sports photos is great because it allows you to bring nearer the subject and have a very good quality size as being a cross between the FF and APS-C. The burst is amazing, 10 fps are excellent for all situations. The exposure is very good and well balanced. 10 mp for me are fine and I consider this one of the best sensor APS-H manufactured by Canon. Not being super super dense produce a workable file. The AF is lightning-fast and customizable throughout. 19 cross-type points are felt. The rear LCD is a bit dated and has a poor resolution compared to the "new." In conclusion, I consider it a great reflex that can be noticed even today. sent on October 18, 2014 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Quality of the file, price, weight. Cons: Shutter 1/4000, a tendency to underexpose, lack double slot. Opinion: In my opinion the best Canon camera for money. The quality of the file is creepy. Superpuliti are also high iso. I believe that the workability of the file is slightly higher than the 5d mark III and slightly less than the 1DX. Very convenient implementation of the wifi and gps. With wifi you can download the photos anywhere on your smartphone and also use its screen to "see" what he sees the camera and use it more as a remote control. Even the GPS does its job well and is beautiful when you return from a trip to instantly see the place where the photograph was taken. Limiting speech is the shutter to 1/4000. I shot that often with important openings I have often set the mode L (low, iso 50 for instance) on sunny days otherwise the photos are overexposed. I would have liked the shutter to 1/8000. I find it very convenient to move the pad in the photos. I'm better with the joystick. The burst is not great but it's not too slow. 4.5 fps are sufficient for a while all situations, except where the sport is definitely improves with at least 6 fps. The af is not his strong point in terms of points of focus but it works very well, especially the central point. Who needs photographing sports events is better to orientate on the 5D mkIII. The meter tends to underexpose without a precise rule. It is definitely not the top. I hope to settle down with a firmware update. Another thing I liked is the double slot. If you are shooting important events is always handy to have a backup copy of the data. I really like to use instead of the SD. They are very comfortable because they cost less, have become almost as fast compact flash, are for sale just about everywhere and also the majority of computers today have a built-in SD reader. They are, however, in my opinion the most delicate compared to CF because they have the contacts to view. The overall assessment of this camera is very positive. I suggest buying! sent on September 19, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: Weight, sharpness, AF speed, colors, contrast, lens hood. Cons: Lack of stabilizer, a minimum distance of maf Opinion: For me it is a spectacular lens, lightweight and with a great flow, especially on a aps-c. Carry it around all day not tired at all even compares to a 300 2.8. At the level of sharpness is unmatched. The 100-400 does not reach the 400 and the 300 f4 fixed multiplied idem. One flaw is that it lacks the stabilizer, which combined with a maximum aperture of f5.6 would not be bad at all, although I must say that in everyday use you do not hear much about the lack. In addition, the minimum distance of maf is a bit long, 3.5 meters. The build quality is top, typical of the series L. Another positive note is that having a weight content not need a tripod head but above all a super strong (and super expensive) for reggerlo.rn sent on September 03, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM Pros: Sharpness, contrast, ring maf really well done. Cons: Weight, no sealing, no stabilizer. Opinion: Objective great, for me number 1 for macro photography canon available in the house. rnQualità constructive to the top! rnHa exceptional sharpness and contrast by fear. The focus so far is of great help to isolate the subject from the background. In addition to this, the 1: 1 ratio is reached at a distance higher than a shorter focal length. It is used well for portraiture and with the limiter maf the af is fast. The flaws in my opinion are the lack of weather sealing, and especially the almost impossibility to use hand libera.rnPer everything else is a fantastic goal! sent on September 02, 2014 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness fabulous engine af fast and above all accurate, quality construction. Cons: Very heavy, but it is f1.4, so it's to be expected, lack tropicalization (not a problem for me but I recognize that for some instead may be). Opinion: Stratospheric lens, nothing to do with the "old sigma." It has an impressive sharpness and fuzzy in my opinion really incisivo.rnLa build quality is top notch and it looks like a rock. It looks very similar to Zeiss as a finish. The focus ring is smooth optimally. The body of the lens from the side camera is knurled on the party from top to bottom, just below the window of distanze.rnE 'silly but it helps a lot to set. The hood is nice and solid locks efficiently (a little hard at first). RnPer lovers of the "magic" of the Canon 35L this lens by definitely not the same effect. For my taste I would choose a lifetime Sigma. I can only recommend it! sent on August 05, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Price, Bokeh, sharpness, AF, weight Cons: No lens hood, ac wide open Opinion: Very glass, truly a marvel. For portraits is fantastic, very clear already from TA. The use of APS-C with great satisfaction, although in some situations interior is a little long. The abberazione cormatica however, is not a problem since it is easily fixable in post-production. The attack of the hood is not the best. It is rolling like most of the goals but a snap, with two "buttons" at the bottom to remove it. It can be uncomfortable when you are in a hurry. sent on June 10, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
