|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lio78 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lio78  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS Pros: construction, AF Fast and precise, sharp (well It's a macro) nice bokeh, versatile. Cons: If you find me let me know Opinion: Great. I do not think it has against, even the price although high can be considered a counter. It's built solidly, optical quality really very high AF very fast and precise and has a really nice bokeh so much to use it quietly even in portraits. With all the goodies of a macro as a convenient and fast AF/MF selector, it is also stabilized. To have if you also like the macro Photography. sent on October 15, 2018 |
 | Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2 Pros: TOP quality, very light, nice to look at. Cons: Only the lens hood is really bad, for the rest I can't find other cons. Opinion: A spectacular Target. we'll See in time if the OLED that shows the distance of the focus will last over time, and has a really bad lens hood that you don't expect in a lens of such stature. For the rest is really well built, beautiful to behold (of course for me) and the optical quality really very high. On Sony A7r2 is really a pleasure to use, returns a file with a hallucinating amount of details, well contraused and colors always beautiful and full. Its cost is well-represented to its Quality. sent on October 15, 2018 |
 | Samyang FE 50mm f/1.4 AF AS IF UMC Pros: Solid construction, Creamy bokeh, great sharpness, price Cons: Af a bit noisy, weight but it is still a 1.4 Opinion: I'm using it recently, but I have to admit that it is a little gem, now I do not know in comparison with the Zeiss that alas I have never tried, but it has a really very high optical quality. On Sony A7R2 returns a nice file, sharp already from 2.8, slightly softer to 1.4 but with a really nice and creamy bokeh. The AF is a bit noisy and not particularly fast but sufficient for most uses, it does not seem suitable for dynamic sports, on the other hand the focal would hardly use for that purpose. At this price you find yourself a really beautiful, well built and high quality optical lens. Obviously the weight is a weak point, but it is still a 1.4. sent on October 15, 2018 |
 | Sony A7r II Pros: High quality files, stabilized sensor, AF quite valid and precise Cons: Battery can be improved, usual menu sony, missing 1 cm in height. Opinion: Spectacular machine, the only feature that misses you is a really very fast AF then it would have been the Top. however, the AF remains valid and fruibeasy in most cases, as for all Sony mirrorless is better in AFC than in Afs. Always as for all Sony mirrorless is missing that inch more in height to have a more comfortable grip, it easily resolves with an L-bracket from €20. The battery is definitely improved, and in fact in Series 3 has been enhanced. The super sensor (among other things bsi) of which it is equipped requires high quality lenses, better if Fixed. Using it is really great, sometimes a little slow on the ignition but then it makes you forgive Everything. sent on October 15, 2018 |
 | Sony A6300 Pros: File, AF Fast and precise, lightweight, typically Sony features Cons: Viewfinder not particularly large, had been 1 cm higher there was also the little finger Opinion: A great value for money car. The file has a very high quality in raw, with very high malleability, in high lights recovers better than a a7r2, while pays pledge in the recovery of the shadows always compared to the a7r2, never used the JPG in the room so I can not give an Opinion. AF very valid and as all Sony goes better in AFC than in Afs. The viewfinder is quite clear and valid only does not have particularly large dimensions. Another small problem that unites all the mirrorless Sony is the position of the migliolo, it would be enough 1 cm more in height, I solved with L-bracket from €20. sent on October 15, 2018 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Price stabilization, crisp Cons: AF is not a splinter. Opinion: Hard to find fault considering the price which is venduto.rnBuona construction, very sharp and also to 300mm is still good enough although less than shorter focal, very good to f8.rnL'AF is decent but not super fast and the lens hood seems some debole.rnIl My sample has a front / back final focus.rnIn problems is an excellent lens in relation to the price. sent on August 10, 2016 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilization, sharpness (including TA), 2.8, resistance to flare Cons: Weight (but it is a 2.8 so ...), diameter filters. Opinion: For the price at which it is proposed is really good, also very crisp at TA improves (like everyone else) by closing some stop.rnIl weight is felt but for the kind of difficult goal to find more leggeri.rnBuona stabilization and resistance to flare even if it does not produce a "star" very beautiful even by closing the very diaframma.rnAF not excellent but more than excellent in 90% of my casi.rnIl has no problem of front / back focus.rnCosto other to screw view filters the size of 82mm diametro.rnAh, last thing to say but not essential: with the hood you dig the trenches with you soon: D sent on August 10, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
