|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Eugenio1978 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Eugenio1978  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 28-100mm f/3.5-5.6 G Pros: Objective very cheap, with good sharpness stopping down between f5.6 and f11, good zoom range. Cons: A decade CT image at the edges, good image quality especially between 35 and 80, build quality enough giocattolosa Opinion: Aim to be replaced because of the known absolutely to throw. I disagree. In fact, by stopping and if you can not use the extremes of the focal length, the lens knows to be giving clear photo absolutely usable. Using this lens for photos in black and white film and a Nikon D300 that having a Dx sensor format allows me to use "the good part" of the lens. From some tests I've done comparing this lens with far more noble f1.8D 50, I could see that at the same focal length and aperture (between f5.6 and f10), the sharpness is almost identical. Unfortunately, the blur and contrast are not up to par. Of course, this does not tell you that the best lens in the world but not that crap that seems to be for most. I believe that as often happens in Italy, the perception of the quality of a lens is only linked to the price: it costs so little will certainly sucks. Not so. I recommend it to those who do not have money to spend, always keep well in mind that isuoi limits. sent on October 05, 2014 |
 | Minolta SRT-303 Pros: Sturdy, solid, reliable, great park performance optics at great prices, I raise the mirror to minimize camera shake, self-timer. Cons: Seals weak, bright viewfinder, I would have appreciated times higher than the second. Opinion: I bought this beautiful camera (after srt100x, 101, 101b and Srt super) for a few euro on ebay. The machine worked perfectly but I had my work cut out to take it apart and clean it. I replaced the plastic window that allows you to see the opening of the diaphragms with a self-made clear acetate. Once reassembled everything I left and I took a hundred photos conrisultati erratic. The problem is exhibited: probably the meter is malfunctioning so much so that a good 30% of the shots were either underexposed or overexposed. Having solved with readings and another machine, the shots are improved to my satisfaction. I love these machines, upload, focuse and manage everything manually with a car older than me always gives me good feelings ... recommend it to all newbies like me to try shooting with gems of the genre. sent on November 09, 2013 |
 | Sony A290 Pros: Simple, ability to utilize optical Minolta af, stabilzzatore image in the camera body, very light (too much), a good number of pixels, well-structured and intuitive menu. Cons: Image noise already at 400 ISO, the dust can easily get to the sensor (!!), Build quality of the camera body. Opinion: I bought the car a few years ago and I took about 80,000 photos. The machine is an excellent entry level with which you can start to experiment, learn and take off their first successes. After so many shots must be said that the design limits of the machine, in my opinion, are essentially two: incredibly I often find myself having to clean the sensor and the light meter, using the lens base 18-55 sottoespone me of at least one stop! ! So it would have to be recalibrated ... Of against the fact of having the stabilizer in the body of the machine, allows to use the endless park optical Minolta AF without hitting the moved. This is very handy when using the tele-zoom.rnIl image sensor allows you to make detailed pictures thanks to its well-14mp but when the light begins to run low and you have to raise the ISO problems begin .... In fact, since the 400 iso noise is clearly present in the image but from 800 noise becomes unbearable especially if the photo is made in color. I also appreciated the number of functions which possesses as various balancyou white, area etc. af ... only be called from the fn key, and the fact of having a single ring instead is a bit 'limited ... but oh well, and there is an entry level sta.rnIl value for money when buying it was still good compared to the more famous brands but in hindsight I would have chosen not just because of the quality of construction: nikon and canon are certainly built better, but do not allow the use of a large number of optical dated (keeping the AF and the stabilizer). sent on November 06, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
