|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Faselix www.juzaphoto.com/p/Faselix  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: sharpness at all focal lengths, magical blur, better price than the competition. Cons: Honestly? nothing Opinion: I have always admired the images of this lens, very clear with a magical bokeh and in my opinion unmistakable. Probably it is the only objective that watching the immaginirnriesco recognize the bill. the only doubt about the purchase was his infamous front-back focus. I decided to buy it together with the sigma dock, it is also useful to update the lens, as well as a precise calibration. I open it and mount it on my eos 6D. Modern and elegant aesthetics, an important but not excessive weight, also very importable for street. Some shots on small objects, the battery test and some photos of my children. Yes, I confirm. What I hoped came true: the lens is perfect fire, sharpness and spectacular bokeh. Now I just have to enjoy it and start using it in everyday life. Maybe for the next outings street, postero'rnqualche shooting. Conclusions: only one: THANK YOU SIGMA !!! rn sent on February 20, 2018 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Good sharpness up to 65mm (ta), lightness, versatility, brightness, portability, price Cons: 65mm to TA loses in clarity, not stabilized. Opinion: After reading many opinions I decide to risk and buy it. I mount it on my eos 6d and i hope i will not encounter such surprises: front or back focus? Slow and inaccurate in low light, noisy focus. Nothing about this. I watch, look at the files, control them on the pc and get a good breath of relief. Well sharpened sharp files at 28 mm f2.8 have a good sharpness up to 65mm and then softens a lot. As soon as the diaphragm closes, the sharpness is really great. Very light but with good solidarity it's a good thing for anyone traveling and does not like bulky weights. With the central focus point of the 6d hooks up the subject well and quickly even in low light, To conclude I would say that all in all for the price quality is definitely promoted.rn. sent on June 17, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 V USM Pros: excellent sharpness at 28mm. tutofare cheap but interesting about FF Cons: soft to 80 mm- unstabilized Opinion: To have bought a wide angle, I was amazed by the sharpness to 28 mm on the Canon 6d, Compared to the 24-105 the 'hard to recognize of one shots and dell'altro.Pagato 70 euro in perfect condition, hood taken apart with just a few Euros. This is not 'stabilized and from the 80mm and' a bit 'soft, but in summary I would say: little expense and lots of performance. sent on April 15, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: accurate focusing -leggerezza- excellent sharpness from 2.8 up Cons: nothing to report Opinion: improved in the focusing is fast and accurate even in low light. lightweight and comfortable. 1.8 and 'slightly soft but can' be an advantage for ritratti.rnda 2.8 up: and 'crystal clear. excellent bokeh. paid 140 euro from rce. quality 'price' amazing. in conclusion, 'a target walking ideal for its leggerezzarnluminosità and quality' image. I wanted to include one of my first shots af 1.8 "look I touch pins" to assess the sharpness to the focal. Hello sent on August 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 35-135mm f/4-5.6 USM Pros: very sharp-rugged-accurate focusing. Cons: non-stabilized aesthetic back ' Opinion: an optical really sharp, now a glass dated, vintage, but offering a better sharpness of many lenses economicherndi new generation. in his day was a price in pounds very challenging ... rnper those wishing to replace the 18-55 kit lens with a really sharp on the cheap ... this could be a great alternative, rnavendo obviously lucky to find it used. sent on December 29, 2014 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: 3 fixed to 1.8 in one. Sharpness at full aperture. Really bright. A handyman high qualitá.rnPrezzo content for what you are offering. Cons: Missing stabilizer-front focus Opinion: after the 'enthusiasm of the first shots I realize that to 18mm, on my Canon 600D with a central point of focus in one shot, safety times respected ... the lens shoot me a remarkable front focus.rnlo port in the store and me change it with another. same problem although it has not. I change it for the third time, but it has the same problem. do? rnnon I certainly can change it to infinity. there were two options: either to buy the dock sigma or send him assistance with the car to get it to calibrate Doc. I selto the secondarnopzione. expected timing of 15 days. so I still have to fully assess its quality '. I can only recommend it to those who have the camera fitted micro rn sent on December 28, 2014 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Great sharpness-very precise autofocus high-strength clear-even to 50mm Cons: None Opinion: After trying his antagonist: the Tamron 17-50 2.8 I see that this is really very clear that it is 17 to 50mm. The Tamron 50mm because I had made it very lost in nitidezza.rnQui is always excellent. Great in the landscape and good portraits. For those doubtful I recommend without any hesitation that this lens will amaze you with its sharpness and accuracy of Autofocus, this last much quieter than the Tamron. In conclusion, if you are looking for an all-rounder of the highest quality at a very affordable price, here you will find everything for your teeth ... sent on June 11, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
