|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Magugno www.juzaphoto.com/p/Magugno  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Venus Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift Pros: Robustness, no flare, sharpness Cons: Nothing Opinion: Beautiful, sharp, flare-free, neutral colors. Had it also been tilt type i Canon it would have been the top but it is still exceptional. Despite the strongly rounded lens there are no halos or parasitic lights even at night with lights like projectors. Excellent metal and materials, exceptional fluidity of the rings. Really good in everything. I have the tse Canon except the 17 and I do not regret it sent on June 14, 2023 |
 | Canon RF 15-30mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: Lightweight, compact, sufficiently sharp, no flare Cons: Barrel distortion not properly corrected by lightroom, colors not like the L series Opinion: Taken to travel light and do not carry EF/RF conversion rings. I would say that it surprised me enough except for the barrel distortion in the widest angle focal lengths. With the sun everywhere in the frame I don't see flare. Colors not like the L series. However I would take it back. Too bad that canon never inserts the hood. Obviously it is all plastic but well assembled. sent on October 16, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Price, weight, dimensions, optical yield, no flare Cons: Noisy focus, plastic, no hood Opinion: Much better in everything except in af than the STM EF version. The RF croaks and looks like a less rapid thread. Not only mine, I tried 3... For the rest I would say excellent, much better than I thought. Unfortunately it is the realm of plastic. I do not find flare, just soft to TA, blurred a bit 'hard but better than brother EF. In the bag you carry it even for the little weight. sent on March 26, 2022 |
| Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Price, weight, dimensions, optical yield, no flare Cons: Noisy focus, plastic, no hood Opinion: Much better in everything except in af than the STM EF version. The RF croaks and looks like a less rapid thread. Not only mine, I tried 3... For the rest I would say excellent, much better than thinking about it. Unfortunately it is the realm of plastic. I don't find flare, just soft to TA, blurred a bit 'direct but better than brother EF. In the bag you carry it even for the little weight. sent on March 26, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Weight, AF, dimensions, sharpness, absence of flare, neutral color rendering Cons: Plastic, distortion poorly managed by lightroom Opinion: Much better than my wildest hopes, superior to all the Samyang and similar tried. Unfortunately at close range the barrel deformation is marked even after the correction in the lightroom. However, it is necessary to intervene manually. I do not find any flare, I find it very bright in the rendering while not distorting the colors, sharp but not "digital". Very satisfied. Unfortunately a bit 'too much plastic and hood not standard. sent on March 26, 2022 |
 | 7artisans 12mm f/2.8 Pros: Small, crisp, light Cons: A little flare, obscene cap, he parades alone in his backpack Opinion: Working PDC scale, marked internal reflections, remarkable sharpness for cost. Cold colors, decliccato diaphragm beautiful but that does not make you understand the transition from one diaphragm to another. One of the best MF optics ever possessed and tried and through circles or my Facebook Group Fotogitando I have tried so many. I definitely keep it for convenience and quality. Those who thought about the cap had drunk so much... sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | 7artisans 55mm f/1.4 Pros: all Cons: nobody Opinion: Working PDC scale, marked internal reflections, very good sharpness. Colors not bad but not bright, decliccatod diaphragm beautiful but that does not make you understand the transition from one diaphragm to another. One of the best optics ever owned and tested by 7Artisans along with 12 and 60 macros. Returned without any repentance after trying the 56 Viltrox sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | 7artisans 50mm f/1.8 Pros: nobody Cons: all Opinion: PdC scale farlocca, exaggerated internal reflections, sharpness last of the class, infinity goes into random focus... Sloppy colors, de-declicated diaphragm beautiful but that does not make you understand the transition from one diaphragm to another. One of the worst optics ever possessed and tried and through circles or my Facebook group Fotogitando I have tried so many. Returned without repentance sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | 7artisans 25mm f/1.8 Pros: nobody Cons: all Opinion: PdC scale farlocca, exaggerated internal reflections, sharpness last of the class, infinity goes into random focus... Sloppy colors, de-declicated diaphragm beautiful but that does not make you understand the transition from one diaphragm to another. One of the worst optics ever possessed and tried and through circles or my Facebook group Fotogitando I have tried so many. Returned without repentance sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | 7Artisans 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: metal and glass, fluidity of the rings, de-cut, economical, engraved diaphragm, cold colors Cons: Weight, difficult to focus on Fuji, internal reflexes Opinion: Taken at just over 100€ because I do very little macro but it satisfied me a lot. Strange lampshed, seemingly solid construction, we will see over time. Beautiful the declicated diaphragm for fine adjustment but uncomfortable in use because you do not feel the transition from one opening to another. Maybe a little heavy he put it back to the actual focal point sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-H1 Pros: Robust, ergonomic, IBIS, very performing, silent and ready shooting Cons: Battery life, complex menus Opinion: I use Sony and Canon mirrorless and although the cost of these is much higher I find the XH1 a worthy competitor of better performing paper machines and FF. It does not disfigure in performance or photographic rendering. Unfortunately the batteries last a little but with a few € they take stock. very ergonomic, very responsive and quite light. What can I say? Very satisfied sent on April 21, 2021 |
 | Samyang AF 18mm f/2.8 FE Pros: Price, compactness, weight, optical yield Cons: plastic construction, no distance scale and hyperfocal Opinion: taken to replace an old 15/30 Sigma unfortunately lost in a slip on Adda edge. He convinced me after 2 months of intense use. For what it costs is well above expectations. The lampshade is truly horrendous, plastic infile but performs its task well. It doesn't give me flare problems. it does not have the scale of distances and hyperfocal but unfortunately lately it has become a luxury.... sent on December 21, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS Pros: Focus excursion, handling, weight, unexpected optical yield Cons: pretty dark but if it had been brighter it would have been non-transportable Opinion: I've been thinking a lot about taking this compromised view because it's really extreme but I have to say that compared to the 28/300l Canon, which I've owned for years, it's definitely much better than white. Unfortunately the construction is much less professional than the canon but the back thanks. I must say that big problems does not have, at least after the software correction. A bit soft from 200 to 240 but nothing painful, better for example of the Canon 70/300 IS. Let's say I'm using it a lot on Sunday motorcycle rides and it's stunning me beyond all expectations sent on July 02, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Pros: Size, weight, inconspicuous, yield between 100 and 250 mm comparable to the 70/200 f4L Cons: Unbalanced, hard zumata guinea Opinion: I agree with everything that is said in weaving the praises of an unjustly mistreated view. Surely the 70/300 L is a little better but for weight, color and size it makes it difficult to seize moments in discretion. The 70/200 f4 is also less discreet. The 70/300 Is is much less performing to me. I am very satisfied and currently use it on Sony A7II and A7RII without any yield problem even with 42 Mpx. The stabilizer is great sent on April 18, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Sharpness, contrast and colors as well as AF silent and fast Cons: A little bit delicate the barrel that is easily marked Opinion: Unlike what you read around I find the best average zoom I have owned, much better than the correspondent Canon that on the contrary I was not minimally satisfied. In my Opinion exceeds, apart from the brightness, the corresponding Canon and Nikon F2,8, owned for years and never appreciated as this little gem. I Do not understand why it is so massacred in the reviews but now I have learned to personally experience the lenses and not to trust the opinions of others. sent on April 11, 2019 |
 | Sony NEX-7 Pros: Construction, weight, trinav, size, low-ISO photo quality Cons: Photo quality at high ISO, noisy viewfinder, made with extreme wide-angle, af in low light / continuous, jpeg in camera Opinion: Taken with little money used, including 18/55. All in all satisfied. Socket to replace the p3 gh3 sold due to problems of encumbrance to my dentist who will appreciate it in the studio.rnMi is used to travel light and still have a good photo yield. Compared to the a6000, apart from the af in low lights and tracking and the noisy viewfinder, I do not see a lower photographic yield. It remains however built much better and much more usable thanks to the tri nav.rnI jpeg are not at all beautiful, kneaded and by the colors tacked, better to use the raw.rnAll added, for what it costs today used it is worth abundantly worth.rn sent on November 09, 2015 |
 | Panasonic GH3 Pros: Construction, ergonomics and tropical conditions, raw quality, functions, wi-fi, speed, video, rear monitor swivel, excellent af Cons: Dimensions not really small for a mirrorless, noise reduction simple Opinion: Taken for a trip to the area at risk, it proved in the few days before the start of an unexpected pearl m4 / 3, slightly less than the em1 Olympus, I have, on the side photo, the upper for the video. The machine is not tiny but not too impressive, exuding a feeling of robustness and reliability, provides a very good file, the size of the sensor, and an equally average raw jpeg, colored a dull edge. The intervention by the anti noise filter has a single position and so better leave it off and play in post with lightroom.rnPer now I'm happy also because I paid a bit 'more than a em5 used and I think it's worth a little ' more. sent on January 02, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR Pros: Focal length, cost, vr, very good closing of a stop Cons: Construction plasticky, does not excel at full aperture and maximum focal Opinion: I have not ever used on the right but only on fx with d700 and d600, d800 on not even try to put it, I think it is much more mistreated than it deserves, compared with the new f4 loses but not so ecclatante to convince me to change ( because even when I want to use is the quality that the nikon nikon 24/70 28/70). His real limit is the softness at full aperture and maximum focal but I in 33 years that I take pictures, I've never seen uniform targets and perfect on the tour and at every opening. In his defense is that I I've had two, the former was more older and made a little 'less, the current was in a kit with d700 and outclasses plenty of what I had and I resold sent on December 26, 2014 |
 | Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 Pros: Small, light, correct, clear and discreet. Excellent resistance to flare. Cons: Construction plasticky, dim Opinion: Very convenient to carry both on exchange on the machine, light to carry and not by the eye. Unfortunately it is not bright, but if it were, would lose many of the features that I praised. The focus is fast. Used with or without a hood, there are obvious differences. The construction is poor, but not as tolerances as materials which do not give to the touch sensations quality. sent on December 25, 2014 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Build quality, mirio electronic, advanced features, size, speed af-s, wb precise, jpg ready Cons: Af-c is not yet up to the SLR, lasting batteries, included software not up Opinion: What can I say, I use it almost every day, has become a faithful companion like no other machine that I have or have had. A pleasure in every sense. Pay a bit 'in the file than the fuji I possess, but not much. Recommended for professional uses also not fast acceleration. Give jpg of very real and ready to use. With bgrip resolves the problem batteries but is lost in portability. The viewfinder sometimes makes me forget to be electronic but in low light loses a bit '. sent on December 25, 2014 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G5 Pros: Small, light, fast mirrorless, video quality compared to competitors mirrorless excluding series gh, display articulated convenient for shooting video or from unusual angles. Cons: Little noisier of olympus current Opinion: Taken for a trip to an area where it is best not to attract attention, and when I could not bring too much hand luggage. Definitely better than any compact while not much bigger. The swiveling display and swivel allows shooting from unusual positions. Pictures it produces are very similar to those of my EM1, must make enlargements pushed to notice a faint noise in the most, I think not more than 1/3 of the diaphragm. From the point of view video triumphs with any Olympus. Convenient touch screen. Quick focus and precise, continuous af acceptable, equal to that of an entry level SLR. sent on December 25, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28-70mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Construction, made old style, sharpness Cons: Weight, they say that the motor is gentle hissing and cracking Opinion: It's my wife, if compared to my canon L series, the Nikon wins hands basse.Vale surely the money it costs and was preferred to 24/70 to yield less contrast and sharpness is the soft passages tonali.La excellent. Suffers a little 'pushed the backlight. For those who know the 17/35, the king is very simile.rnChe say very satisfied sent on July 22, 2014 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark III Pros: AF, exposure, strength, malleable file Cons: Weight, monitor poorly defined and difficult to read in bright light Opinion: Avaevo the ds2, then I had the 5d mk2, now ds3 and 5d mk3. I must say that I find them in the files best ds3, in addition to this I consider it superior to the other for operation. Maybe a wire less than the 5D3 for af but let's talk about equipment at the top and the differnza you see in extreme cases. Compared to ds2 throughout higher, especially for battery operation and menus. sent on May 11, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
