|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gioberfoto www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gioberfoto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | TTArtisan 11mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Done well good sharpness even at f2.8. Price. Cons: A bit pesantuccio. Opinion: About this optics I was not very enthusiastic, reading various reviews and saw tests on the tube, I expected more. However, it is a lens of good sharpness throughout the frame from 5.6 onwards. Done really well, even if it fits in the palm of my hand, it is heavy, it is small but weighs. Difficult to focus via monitor has so much field of view that you have to zoom to focus well. The infinite sign does not coincide with the reference notch, nothing serious is done the tests at full opening and the exact point is defined. With the z7 it is more than fine then found hyperfocal no longer need to focus important check the aperture, because it is declicked and can be moved easily. In conclusion for the price it costs is a good fisheye also bright. Aberrations that are easily corrected and little vignetting. What about I will try time allowing to do something different. Good light to all friends. sent on January 23, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S Pros: S line Cons: Cost Opinion: Having had this optics for a few days now, moving to the Z system, I traded 20 1.8 g for this optics that seems superior to the previous model in all. Clear from fear even at the edges you can take more than good photos at full opening, flares and absent reflections you have to go and obviously look for attention to the neutral filters that you mount us, I no longer use them, especially on these new optics. The only drawback perhaps is the graft, because the lens has the barrel for quite long focus and when I go to insert the optics on the machine it turns and gives me the impression that I did not insert it well. But I repeat it is I who have big hands. However upset even if the price is Altino I recommend it, now there is a cash discount of 150 EU. sent on November 22, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S Pros: Yield, lightness, clutter, the ability to mount filters without fainting. Cons: Distortion correction cannot disable sharp angles at 14mm. Opinion: Reading the various reviews many find this optics excellent in sharpness even at the edges. I'm partly in agreement but we have to start from 16mm and up. Yes because a14mm the corners can not be looked and the difference between a perfect copy and a no is a bale, in my opinion. If you work in a certain way with bubble machine and particular situations with medium diaphragms then it looks excellent as optics. If you decide to take it around street or in the woods without considering those above rules you will always notice its limits at 14mm that is clear. Overall I call it more than good but the price is high, rating8.5.I wanted to make an update to this view in positive ,having tried it little I did not realize that I mounted on a uv filter hoya good but not great, well, removing the filter I noticed an improvement visible at the edges and in general as sharpness. Conclusion the lens I like is not perfect but it goes more than well always remains at 14mm a little kneaded in the corners but without uv filter much sharper, I learned from this experience that you never have to be superficial and go in a hurry when you judge and try an optics change my judgment and my vote to a nice 10 and I apologize if I was pessimistic and negative about the optics. sent on October 08, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S Pros: Everything from a 50mm Cons: Don't have it Opinion: Today came a thank you to Mr Gabriele of Fotomoderna Siena for having me try and finally buy the optics in question. What to say the difference you see right away , it is not the usual 50 1.8 but much more already at 1.8 compared to the g series is the sharp maximum from fear I had the 50 sigma 1.4 but the impression of this optics at the first shot was magical. I will review this lens calmly and with photos but I repeat at the first catch it is wonderful. Maybe the blurry not homogeneous a little nervous but all in all good ,certainly not at the levels of 85mm.However having the Z6 I am very happy and I think on z7 from 46mega gives the maximum. sent on August 25, 2020 |
| Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S Pros: Everything from a 50mm Cons: Don't have it Opinion: Today came a thank you to Mr Gabriele of Fotomoderna Siena for having me try and finally buy the optics in question. What to say the difference you see right away , it is not the usual 50 1.8 but much more already at 1.8 compared to the g series is the sharp maximum from fear I had the 50 sigma 1.4 but the impression of this optics at the first shot was magical. I will review this lens calmly and with photos but I repeat at the first catch it is wonderful. sent on August 25, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z6 Pros: Pro Cons: It can only get better. Opinion: Arrived in kit with the 24/70 s F4 that say if not to reiterate the positive comments made so far, I updated the firmware to 3. The first thing that surprised me was the viewfinder , really great does not look like a monitors approach to that of a light reflex and I do not find it at least for now tiring beautiful really. I don't know yet. The weight although less than the d850 that I still thought less but definitely is very handy to carry around. Customization at the highest levels really Top.Now I just have to shoot to try the files. I didn't think the first ML Nikon was so beautiful in everything, I will not fail to update you, to the next one. Dismantling the menu by making test photos having the monitor always on with a fully charged battery I made about 500 photos and I still have 40 % so I think the problem of the battery is not so serious ,what bothered me the most is the take off the card from the door, you have little room to grab it as it should, it will be that I have big hands. Another thing that bothers me a little is the wheel that I use to change the diaphragm too close to the ignition switch,sometimes I turned off the machine, but I repeat maybe I have a little hand. For now, this is the first approach. sent on June 12, 2020 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH Pros: Sharpness, , made colors, light, rendered to all openings,compactness. Cons: Don't get it before. Opinion: What to say, everything I would have expected that such a small lens would have such a high quality, already at F 1.7 is sharp on almost the entire frame, the only bad thing are the chromatic aberrations always at full opening but are resolved in CR. I can't wait to go around shooting indiscreet for street in my opinion is the maximum, I have to try this genre . On olympus om1 mk2 the autofocus is very fast and the leica rendering is not discussed I immediately noticed the difference in colors between the panaleica and the zuiko. The blurry is beautiful and enhances the foreground with a cinematic effect. I'm finally upset with an optics that excites me, too bad I didn't take it sooner. sent on May 13, 2020 |
 | Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/2 Pros: Didn't have it before Cons: Aberrations to TA but manageable. Opinion: Superb optical sharpness to smooth dial balanced on the d850. The manual focus I have to tell the truth at the beginning creates problems of out of focus even if a little,but after a few clicks you can figure out how to look both in the viewfinder and helping with focus peaching. All the merits said by those who preceded me correspond to truth. On the AC at full opening I thought worse , there are but recover in CR. I had both the Nikon and the sigma , and I have to say that this optics outweighs them in everything, I do not agree on the sharpness that here in the reviews someone says that it is not so sharp. I think it's the fault of the manual system of focus repeat is not easy in manual but I made pictures to sharp f2 that I have never seen on sigma or Nikon. Not to mention the Zeiss anti-reflective treatment, I tried in every way to make a reflection come in the photo ,I did not succeed, amazing. Weird taken used equal to the new sacrificing with pleasure a 24/70 Nikon f2.8 VR that stood there in the bag because the work for him ended up with even a refund. I would like two more of these Zeiss on the 21st and 135th we see the after covid. sent on April 20, 2020 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG 8-18mm f/2.8-4.0 ASPH Pros: Pro Cons: Price,soft at open diaphragms corners Opinion: After buying and trying the Zuiko 7/14 2.8 I wanted and had to consider this optics. Let's say the first difference between Pana and Zuiko is mm. Then the optics are equal in terms of sharpness, although the Zuiko would seem sharper than the average values. But what made me understand which of the two to choose are the flare.il panaleic is almost free of reflection of any kind, the Zuiko was just a little light or side light and Ghost and flare were never missing. As quality the Zuiko would seem to have done better has a distance scale , it has a button to be able to assign any command species with an Olympus M1 mk2, it is in fact a 14/28, and has a constant diaphragm of 2.8.The panaleica does not have all these things but goes straight to the bottom, images with the Leica timbre, sharp , does not suffer or suffer from flare ne of Ghost is a 16/36 and you can mount the filters. I must tell the truth I found a hair of difference how sharpness the Zuiko is ahead, but closing in a little mid diaphragm are identical. Summarizing ,everything written so far by other reviews are consistent with this optics. What to say cost and not little I preferred to put something back because the Zuiko I had bought new and the Pana used but great, but what convinced me at the change useless repeat it are the reflections that on the Pana are almost non-existent. I'll finish by giving a nice 10 to that optics and as soon as I get to try it more I'll update you. Yes after taking a few photos I have to say that it is a good lens but does not convince me at all,creates several halos in particular circumstances and the sharpness at the edges I do not like,the Zuiko was better. Maybe I don't have a feeling with zoom optics I'm thinking of a fixed staying in the Leica house,we'll see.vote 6. sent on February 21, 2020 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Pro Cons: Ghost and flare to iosa Opinion: I bought this lens recently I let myself be carried by the brand and because I also have the 12/100 great. The optics is wonderful but just a light point a window and creates indomitable Ghostias I do not know whether to take the panaleica or not. Used on the Olympus M1 mk2 I will do other tests but I think to give up and even if the panaleic is a 16mm equivalent I will make a reason. I'm sorry but taking photos must be relaxing and unfortunately with this lens you can not, I had to listen to the advice of some friends who here on yuza had warned me. I have to thank Mr. Gabriele of Fotomoderna who makes me change with the panaleic . I'll keep you updated on the Pana as well. sent on February 14, 2020 |
 | 7artisans 7.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Material quality and cost . Cons: Aberrations and sharpness at the edges. Opinion: Strong aberrations in some cases,then you have to always be careful that the diaphragm goes on its own because it does not go jerky but is as fluid as the focus,and you find yourself at full opening or closed to the maximum.As sharpness is sharp enough in the center but at the whole opening the photo loses species at the edges . Let's say you can play with the particular shots, and if you're careful about the distortion you can take unusual photos. I would say that for the cost and for how this optics is built it is worth having it on the stock exchange.voto8.5.ps : I update my review at a distance of some further evidence , I can say that it is an acceptable optics from the point of view colors , but not of general yield , the vote is negative. A lot of aberration at the edges as well as lack of general sharpness in lateral light conditions. I like for the materials I give it in trade and I try the samyang 7.5 f 3.5 of which speak well on yuza. Thank you for your patience but if you want to give a fair judgment you have to try it for a while. sent on November 26, 2019 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: All Cons: don't have it Opinion: I had the 12th 40 2.8 I wanted to try this fantastic goal, as I have to say that we are there , maybe the 12th 40 sins at the maximum opening in the edges , which does not do the 12th 100 f4. It is true that you lose a diaphragm and that weighs more, but little, in my opinion it is a wonderful all-rounder optics. Using it with double stabilization thing I don't have you can do nice stuff with slow times. In conclusion I recommend it to those who want to do long excursions and do not have to always change your mind, if you own the 12th 40 2.8 it is difficult to decide to give it for the 12th 100 I would keep them both are optical pro , but I have to choose to monetize. I chose to keep the 12th 100, for the reasons above. I conclude , for now I need the 12th 100 then maybe more 'the' there I would combine a light optics type 17mm f1.2 pro. In conclusion I tried to take a few photos with an em10/3 not really suitable because small, but I have to say that I really like this optics. I found that double stabilization is possible with the EM10/3 just turn on both the button on optics and in the machine . Can you make unthinkable shots with times that even with easel I could not do? joke but it's great, I came almost to a second freehand. Update : I gave away the em10 mk 3 for an M1mk2 that say much more balanced AF lightning and the ability to use the fn key on the lens as yield does not change between the two machines but as ergonomics is a whole other story. sent on October 30, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 E ED VR Pros: All Cons: Don't have it. Opinion: What about the displeasure of the optics I come from the smooth 24-70 not vr ,sharpness on the whole frame at 2'8 I seem to have a fixed optics,bokeh fantastic from fairy tale . Despite many negative reviews on doxomark and photography sites I found this lens stratospheric, and in addition taken (thanks to Mr Fanetti of Fotomoderna ) a great used equal to the new. The only thing I noticed is that from 50mm to 70mm if I shoot from less than 60 to 70cm to 2.8 the image turns out to me a little soft in the middle, but closing a stop is perfect. To those who find reviews about the nikon as happened to me ,in which you make comparisons with sigma art or tamron you are not to hear anyone try the nikon if you can I on d850 I think I have never found such a perfect optics, in all. Extra advice, pocket permitting, the 24th 70 vr nikon . I don't talk about weight because I come from the old man and I knew it but I noticed that even if it weighs 170 grams more it is very well balanced. I forgot he also has the vr that sometimes makes a difference, and it goes that it's a fairy tale. I think the nikon has made a really good lens I dare not think of the new 24-70 2.8 s for nikon z. They say that the nikon s per ml is better according to those who tried them both. I do not think that nikon does not allow to use the optics with adapter on ml z, there will be a difference but not exaggerated as they describe, also because they cost equal. What I understand is that all the old optics say old, they go better on nikon z.Maybe it's physiological no mirror, stabilizer in the car ,etc etc... I remain of the opinion that if I were to switch to the system ml z the optics that I now have the earths , because the glass is good and always good. sent on May 07, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8G Pros: Sharpness, price, compactness. Cons: No tropicalization. Opinion: Having had problems with the Sigma 35 even after various calibrations with Dok, I decided to try the Nikon always 1.4. Maybe I'm unlucky with this kind of focal? Although the copy I tried is used but well kept, the lens hood is slow and can easily unhook, but what I left of putty is the aberration, so much but a lot. Then at full aperture soft images compared to Sigma. In the end I tried the Nikon AFS G 1.8. It will be pure plastic but it is gorgeous, crisp at full aperture, light, a bit ' aberration but correctable the CR thing with the 1.4 I could not. I would like to know from Nikon the why of the price so high for 1.4. Only regret is that the sigma I liked sin for the AF. However, Straconsiglio this optics, no mistake a shot, the only flaw is the blurry not like the sigma but approaching and so, given its lightness makes you want to turn for photographic street. sent on March 28, 2019 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: light, crisp, well built, comes with bag and two lens hood, stabilized. Cons: stabilizer a little noisy tends to underexpose with relationship 1:1 Opinion: I had a nikon 105 2.8 micro vr is a Zeiss makro planar 2 which I then sold for other purchases, I was undecided whether to go back to nikon or not, for Zeiss I don't think manual focusing is not for me. But then I noticed this sigma and reading various reviews I decided to buy it. . What bothers me most is the noise of the stabilizer, the rest who say I saved and I have good optics. I give him 9 as vote if it was art series I think 10 e lode, I have both the 50 mm that the 35 gorgeous art is little more than Zeiss. sent on April 12, 2018 |
 | Nikon SB-5000 AF Speedlight Pros: possibility to work with flasher separate from the camera. easily. Cons: just spend another 200 euros and go to buy the transceiver kit. Opinion: excellent flash both indoors and outdoors. like the sb910. excessive cost for radio commands. very suitable for professionals who work there because you simplify your life outdoors, especially with lots of creativity. in conclusion excellent flash but dear.reliable in every light situation especially in outdoor. For those who need a professional flash is the top. sent on March 23, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
