Reviews written by Mauro Riccitelli

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Mauro Riccitelli
www.juzaphoto.com/p/MauroRiccitelli

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Mauro Riccitelli

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EOS R6

Pros: Autofocus and Stabilization - use at high iso

Cons: Feeling of "average" quality of building materials - too unbalanced when used with 24-70 2.8 or, worse, with 28-70 2.0.

Opinion: Formidable autofocus and possibility of using jpg as coming out of the camera (something common to all mirrorless, since it is almost impossible to get the exposure wrong). Viewfinder not at all comparable to that of a high-end SLR, as well as for ergonomics (try to handle a 5D Mark IV to have a term of comparison). Poor battery life - low noise (obvious with 20 megapixels) and good inamica range help.

sent on September 15, 2022

Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Pros: Optical and material quality - excellent behavior at all focal lengths

Cons: Weight and price

Opinion: If we think that the "global design" of the mirrorless system tended to reduce weight and size, in this case, "the goal" was not achieved. The optics are large and heavy, too heavy to be used for many hours walking along paths and roads. Compared with Canon Eos 5D MKIV + 24/70 2.8 LII we are almost at the same weight. I find it suitable for photos in the studio and in all circumstances where it is possible to "detach" the equipment from the neck. Very beautiful colors and useful additional bezel.

sent on August 24, 2022

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II

Pros: Max Aperture 2.8

Cons: Weight-size-Price

Opinion: I have used for years the 24-70 4.0 L IS. Compared to the latter it has nothing more than the possibility of greater detachment from the 2.8 diaphragm background. Of cons is not stabilized, which is very useful in many situations. With the same diaphragm, until now, IMHO, the sharpness is identical. It also weighs more and is bulkier.

sent on May 06, 2019

Canon 5D Mark IV

Pros: ROBUSTNESS - SPEED - DYNAMIC RANGE SLIGHTLY IMPROVED COMPARED TO THE MKIII - VERY USEFUL TOUCH DISPLAY

Cons: Price

Opinion: I COME FROM THE USE OF THE 5D MARK III - I DO NOT FIND ANY IMPROVEMENTS THAT MAKE IT NECESSARY TO MOVE TO THE EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE 5DMKIV - THE 30 MP DOES NOT SEEM TO GIVE GREAT IMPROVEMENT - LET'S NOT TALK ABOUT THE RAW DUAL PIXEL - IN ALL FRANKNESS, TO DATE, I HAVE NOT YET ACHIEVED RESULTS THAT MAKE ME FULLY SATISFIED. I NOW REGRET MY 6D FIRST SERIES, OF WHICH I CAN ONLY SAY ALL THE GOOD POSSIBLE.

sent on September 28, 2018

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR

Pros: Lightweight and discreet

Cons: Hood - Price

Opinion: Purchased by listening to various reviews regarding the slow pace of FA compared with 35 1.4.rnHo had occasion to do test "practical" of the two lenses in critical light conditions: the times I have identici.rnConsiderando seems that you can not find the '1.4 at the same price of 2.0 and that the blur of 1.4 is quite different, I leave you the conclusioni.rnrn

sent on October 08, 2016

Fujifilm X-E2S

Pros: Lightweight and wearable, good AF

Cons: Highlights - more than bad battery life - no file management program for Raw

Opinion: First impressions to two days after purchase, so I intend to go back sull'argomento.rnOttima camera always keep in your purse, do not miss a beat. Excellent viewfinder that allows you to preview the exhibition, except for some jam. But I believe that making comparisons with fullframe systems is a bit risky, if not dictated by total inexperience. They are different worlds and I think we should not compare. I made the shots of the same scenes executed with Canon EOS 6D but the comparison does not hold up, especially on the high lights there storia.rnProvata for the moment with 23 f1.4 - f 1.4 and 35 35 f Total 2.0.rnGiudizio VERY GOOD. To think of abandoning the fullframe in favor of XE2S recommend using both sistemi.rn

sent on September 17, 2016

Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM

Pros: SHARP, COLOUR, BRIGHTNESS '

Cons: THERE IS AGAINST

Opinion: IS PART OF LENSES CANON THAT HAVE A SOUL !!!! THE ENCHANTED blurred LEAVE FOR SMOOTH 'AND PLEASURE. COLORS ARE EXCEPTIONALLY FAITHFUL. NOT 'MUST MAKE CORRECTIONS OF ANY KIND TO FILE OBTAINED. PORTRAIT IN NON SPORTS APPREHENSION COMING PHOTOGHAPHED, AS IT HAPPENS USED The BIG AND HEAVY ZOOM TUTTOFARE.

sent on June 18, 2015