RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Hippolais
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Hippolais



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Hippolais


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

tamron_18-400vc_hldTamron 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD

Pros: Brighter than expected, weight, focusing distance

Cons: it is at most an effective 18-280, at "400mm" it is clear only at f10-12

Opinion: I bought this lens on an agreement with amazon and, after receiving it, I compared it with the Canon 100-400II. Already at 100 mm the magnification in Tamron is slightly lower than the Canon, but then the gap increases to 200 mm and finally, at 300 and 400 mm, the Tamron almost no longer enlarges, reaching an intermediate magnification factor between 200 and 300 of the Canon. I checked with the store, returning it, that it was not my goal to be defective, but that even a second Tamron 18-400 lens was just like a "package". So I asked for a refund. Of course I am amazed by the lack of seriousness of Tamron.rnResto available to send, to those who wanted it, the file comparison between the Canon lens and the Tamron

sent on December 27, 2017


canon_sx50hsCanon PowerShot SX50 HS

Pros: Great for photo documentative animals, light, usable in any situation (good stabilizers for night shots), extremely cheap for the results allows to obtain, focuses on 50X in little more than a meter away, allows you to make excellent video, sound and shock resistant (also has fallen several times on the tarmac by a meter in height), enables you to work on manual adjusting exposure time and ISO.

Cons: Limited capacity in the photograph birds in flight: insufficient viewfinder, focus difficult. Often has trouble focusing on macro subjects such as flowers (we recommend manual focus). Shades the background much less of an SLR, as well as the actual quality of the photos is not comparable (and rightly so) to pictures taken with real targets equivalent. Already considerable noise over 800 ISO.

Opinion: Truly a bomb for what it costs, money well spent. Fun in every situation on the ground, even in low light conditions (in which you may want to underexpose by 2/3-1 stop), allowing you to bring home a decent photo to documentation of the animals that are found in every situation, even when machines more cameras listed ranging in difficulty. The only real flaw is the viewfinder, otherwise you can not expect more.

sent on July 02, 2014




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me