Reviews written by Mauro Pac

Samsung S9

Pros: variable aperture, iso files, quality improvement to the estate, good shots in low light.

Cons: automatically tends to get through f 2.4 even when it would be better to pass through f 1.5 to keep the lowest iso, fortunately the pro mode allows you to define and modify any parameters to your liking. The hdr is sometimes too pushed with results not always pleasant on the s7 and s8 the hdr was more balanced.

Opinion: There is little to say, the phone is a plane, pleasant to use, the camera gives the best of if in manual mode but gets along well even in the simple point and shoot, maybe the Auto mode of the previous generation ran the shot better with consequent more balanced images but I am sure they are problems that will solve soon with updates as has already happened in the past, alternatively I installed the apk of the google camera that works very well and goes to bridge the gap of that stock. Let me be clear, we talk about inezze that only a picky as I am would notice, a roaming user there would case. Rest of the opinion it's the best camera phone on the market today.

sent on May 01, 2018

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM

Pros: Stunning sharpness even at 2.8, excellent construction, accurate and quick f.

Cons: If we just want to put it as a defect then I say weight

Opinion: It has an unbelievable optic, it manages to cling sharply with great fixes with the advantage that this is a zoom, blur and full and soft and I really like it very much, the model laid out would make it more comfortable but from what I can say that I can say it around does not reach the same sharpness, so we say that there are pros and cons in both specimens, the construction is tanked but it is detrimental to the weight that is felt especially if you have to carry it around for long journeys some occasions I did not want to carry it behind. "All in all I'm really pleased with this lens and I think it will be difficult to separate me.

sent on September 29, 2017

Samsung Galaxy S6

Pros: Materials, camera quality, RAW, good overall performance, size.

Cons: Battery life, no removable battery, lack of slots to expand memory with micro SD.

Opinion: This terminal is very well done, the quality of materials is at the top, the overall operation is very smooth although not among the fastest I've tried, but I think depends on the settings of the manufacturer and not by the hardware limitations that fact is respectable. RNLA camera is one of its strengths, in most situations behaves very well, has no major problems even in low light conditions qual'ora of the failure to achieve a satisfactory result Please in automatic mode with the aid of a tripod and activating the pro mode manually you can get results beyond expectations, thinking that it is cmq a cell would say that you can remain truly amazed! This smartphone is currently still one of the best terminals on the market although as the main defect is the battery life, which is not bad but others do much better in life, I also tried the galaxy s7 which further improves in terms fotografici mostly in low-light shots that really stunned, in the day instead S6 photo manages to be a little 'higher, S7 also improves battery though not so abysmal and the display has a better balanced and white brighter, for the rest if the plays to pari.rnChe say ultimately, if you want a good camerafonino this is definitely a good end to buy today, even as the price at which you can not buy.

sent on July 15, 2016

Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Pros: Sharpness at all focal lengths and TA, stabilizer very effective, excellent color rendering, USD silent, soundness, sealing, buying it in the store you get the Polyphoto warranty of 5 years.

Cons: Quite heavy but definitely understandable why, expensive 82mm filters, focusing not just fast in low light conditions but overall acceptable, considerable price, but considering the Canon 24-70 f2.8 II would say that saving is a lot.

Opinion: I purchased this light for my Canon 6D after reading several reviews and watched many videos comparison with the more expensive Canon 24-70 f2.8 II, it was said that on many comparisons lost sharpness at 24mm compared to canon, I could make a comparison between these 2 personal goals thanks to a friend who owns it, and I have not seen any noticeable loss of sharpness, nor the rest of it to 24mm focal lengths and apertures (at least for my copy) the only things that I can say may be slightly better in canon is that in low light conditions Canon engages faster (although in each case tamron always snaps and never misses the focus), but in contrast canon does not have the stabilizer and I would say that there is little second thing, the hood of the Tamron is just infimo.rnNon know if it was luck or if they are all so these tamron, but as for me I consider myself quite satisfied, my friend said the fact that some rode, he could save € 1000. , D

sent on December 30, 2013

Canon 6D

Pros: Excellent qulità sensor and files, excellent performance at high ISO so the exploitability is high, the central point of focus from very good to excellent and good the rest, the body strong and light machine, practical and intuitive to use (I do not I never had the joystick so for me it is not a problem that there is not) rnil buffer is full and you can never make a lot of continuous shots, good management of the external flash, very convenient wi-fi

Cons: Body a little bit for those with large hands, when mounting a perspective quite heavy as the Tamron 24-70, you feel the need of a battery grip for more comfortable grip and a balanced weight, but for the ' precisely with the battery grip problema.rnSento solve the lack of dedicated WB button but considering everything else I close an eye !! : DrnPer the rest I do not find other flaws, who puts a fault the flurry, 1/4000 and the second SD slot, could buy the 5D mark III if he was bothered by these shortcomings! XD

Opinion: I admit that I was hesitant before buying it, I was convinced that the files of this camera body were not really good as it was called, even though I knew they were obviously better than those of my old 500D, but I was considering other camera bodies to make the ' upgrade, I finally decided, and I bought it, and the files are really good as they say, I was incredibly surprised they are! rnL'ho proven with the 50mm 1.8, the Canon 70-200 f4, the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 and 17-40mm f4, and the level of detail in all optics it is altissimo.rnNe I was fully satisfied! rnPer my needs this camera body is perfect, I could not wish anything meglio.rnrnP.S. after more than two years of use and experience can only say that xi money that is offered this camera in my opinion is the best choice of purchase that can be done, the possibility of exploiting heavily iso allows you to take home always some good shots in any situation, gave me a lot of satisfaction in this two yearsand passes, I made more than 120 million clicks, the shutter unfortunately does not last more than 100,000 shots, my to 97,000 was gone but the replacement was not as costly, with 164 € I replaced it and clean the sensor, I thought he plucked me hearing other colleagues and their experiences so very happy also to questo.rnMi feel I advise to all those who have no intention or ability to spend too much money but had cmq a product that produces professional-level files.

sent on December 26, 2013

Canon 500D

Pros: Handy, practical, intuitive, affordable price for all who want to enter the world of DSLR.

Cons: Noise at high iso, images from more than good to good up to ISO 400, 800 discrete, above 800 notevolemente the quality goes down, sometimes inpreciso AF, slow burst of shots.

Opinion: I own this canon in over 2 years, efects is my first DSLR and I must say that after 2 years of use I feel the need to move to a much higher level camera. I seemed to have just bought a camera in hand amazing and I must say it gave me a lot of satisfaction, as though you learn and make the eye more and more experienced, you realize that you wish you could do something that goes beyond the limits that unfortunately the car you require. The problem of high ISO, not a problem just for those who love to night photography that is in fact what they like to do to me, so do not recommend it to anyone who is interested in this type of fotografia.rnComunque is a camera that value for money and for those who have big needs is very good, has the same sensor of the 50D.

sent on August 19, 2013