|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rosario Cafiso www.juzaphoto.com/p/RosarioCafiso  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 Pros: F1.2 exploitable construction brightness detail from f 2.8 Cons: Flare with front light chromatic aberration Opinion: I state that the focal length 50mm I have never liked .... a lens bought so as a joke to experience the thrill of the F 1.2 .... mounted on Sony A6000 has become the fixed lens that I use the most.... love at first sight... solid construction.... very fluid rings and pure metal screw cap. We come to the practice used at f 1.2 is fully exploitable and the detail is good ..... from f 2 or better from f 2.8 it becomes extremely sharp and you understand that it is a lens that for what it costs you will never deprive yourself of. Now let's go to the flaws ... suffers from flare with direct light and chromatic aberration obviously easily corrected in Post. sent on November 19, 2021 |
 | Sony E 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS Pros: Sharpness stabilized compact light.... It's a G-series Cons: For the price and catheters you can't complain so much about the brightness.... Opinion: A very clear objective that is fully exploitable at all focal points, which allows you to make incredible shots even with your free hand, barrel block key, af/mf key,stabilizer key on the body. I've been using it for a very short time on Sony at6000 and I tried it with in-flight raptor shots, it proved fast the autofocus in good light . Quite compact and performing. Obviously in low light conditions try a little .... but I normally use it during the day and I couldn't ask for more.... sent on August 11, 2020 |
 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Sharpness Compact Versatility Cons: Price.... Not very bright Opinion: I State that I prefer the maximum sharpness and consequently I always try the objectives that reflect this feature without getting too economically. I have owned the fixed Sigma 28 F 2.8 and Sigma 30 f 2.8 of which I was fully satisfied, later I switched to the Sony 18 105 F 4 with which I had a contraked relationship as to sharpness never convinced me too much..... And hence the breakthrough, I managed to regain the clear clarity I was looking for, I absolutely regret the two fixed Sigma indeed.... Comparing and crossing shots the Sony I find it much sharper. MTF tests are always sharper than the Sony Zeiss 16 70 and Sony 18 105 F4. As if not enough has a focal range of all respect that allows you to leave the other lenses at home. Its little brightness has never created me any problem as I prefer panoramas and in low light conditions at the lower focal length is still maintained on a value of 3.5-4 plus being stabilized allows me to shoot with relatively low times . Very Compact and what not just has the switch on the AF/MF barrel. Only downside I think is actually the price definitely high. sent on April 06, 2019 |
 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pros: Excellent telephone sector ... functional and fluid Cons: Ineffective night camera for portraits or selfies Opinion: Great very functional smartphone with good apps installed and very fluid . let's talk about the photography industry. Great in daytime photos with a beautiful detail and composition,strong and natural colors,I recommend compared to the factory settings to set only the sharpness from normal to high,problems arise as soon as there is little light photos especially in the presence of human faces are definitely kneaded by software that tries to remedy chromatic noise. Trying to take advantage of the camera in manual you can only act on the balance of white and iso... nothing else. About the processor I point out that it is a Snapdragon 636 and not the one written in the caption. In any case, what it costs is absolutely worth the money spent. Eternal Battery... for my use I always do quietly three days sent on November 08, 2018 |
 | Sony E PZ 18-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Constant F4-- robustness -- light and compact multi-use to be an 18 105-- Cons: maf sometimes slow in low light conditions... sharpness just enough Opinion: On Sony a6000 I used purely fixed lenses Sigma 19 F 2.8 Sigma 30 f 2.8 Minolta 50 f 1.7 with which I always found myself great , I always prefer the maximum sharpness. After two years of intensive use I start to tire of constantly changing optics and as a result I tried to take an AF lens that can replace them with dignity. After 6 months that I use the above lens and I alternated and compared the fixed with the Sony 18 105 I came to conclusions. moment of despondency because 'actually' I was expecting something more... from the direct comparison on the fixed comes out enough but nothing more...., f 4 constant to all the focal is stabilized,perhaps a little slow to focus in low light conditions. Now I have sold the aforementioned lens in favor of the Sony E 18 135 ... Morale I sold ALL fixed targets owned and the Sony 18 105...... from the tests carried out in an empirical manner and in any case in the same shooting conditions the differences of sharpness and microcontrast were immediately too evident in favor of the Sony 18 135 also I inserted to my kit the Samyang 12 f 2nd account to take as soon as the Sony E 70 350 is talked about very well. sent on August 20, 2018 |
 | Tokina RMC 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Surely the sharpness and his strong, very solid .Costruzione saturated colors, aperture ring and focus very soft to use. Cons: flare consistent Opinion: The use of Sony A6000, sharpness definitely greater than 16 50 Sony kit, I use it as the main lens for street, I was going to replace it with the Sigma 30 f 2.8 DN also owning the Sigma 19 f 2.8 DN, but 'I think that will not do 'change as sharp as it seems in my opinion actually higher than the Sigma posseggo.Potete get an idea on my gallerie.Inoltre for what it costs, and' definitely an apt purchase. sent on December 03, 2016 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: SLR performance with compact dimensions from, fast and accurate AF, manual focus peaking in fantastic good up to ISO 3200 Cons: Battery life, few targets emount Opinion: I come from a variety of SLR Sony (A200 A350 A58) past the Mirrorless not a whim or excessive weight due to the photographic material to take but just 'cause I stole all the equipment, therefore I preferred to go to the Sony a6000 especially to have a equipment to take with me.Dopo few days lost due to understand all the many features I realized I had available a device that allowed me to do (better) what 'I did before with the camera, but with a footprint minimum and qualitivamente for amateur use definitely fantastic. sent on November 08, 2015 |
 | Sony SLT A58 Pros: Excellent yield at ISO 800 1600 good qualita'immagini excellent autofocus module Cons: ISO car not settable on an adjustable limit depending on the needs, flash is not very powerful Opinion: Coming from a Sony A350, the differences are significant, it is certainly more 'than what costa.Ottima dynamic range, I can see in the large display the image as it will be' taken thanks to technology Sony.Gli unique in that I recognized are those reported, insufficient flash and auto ISO setting is not manageable all'utente.Corpo very light that does not tire. sent on September 20, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
