|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gion65 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gion65  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R8 Pros: Quality files.. light.. Good simplicity of the menu.. Lots of features. EF/R Adapter .. really good autofocus.. Very responsive touch screen, like a high-quality smartphone. it also has the "focus stacking in camera" and the Preburst in Raw and this is no small thing. Cons: I'll take some time to evaluate. Opinion: If appetite comes with eating, then here we go. The R8 is exactly that. I reserve some time to give you an exhaustive review. For the moment I'm testing it well with all the modalities and conditions .. It's only been a week since I've had it and it's not enough to give an accurate impression on a camera that has just come out... sent on May 25, 2024 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Used price, ease of use, good sharpness, excellent color, autofocus is quite fast, good stabilization Cons: The weight maybe.. The lens hood attachment looks quite fragile, dust could get in easily Opinion: For the price at which it can be found, it can be attractive. When used with the correct shutter speeds and tripod, the files will be great. otherwise flabby.. The collar with a fairly large attachment bracket is great and the manual autofocus is sweet to use. It's quite heavy but you can still use it freehand even without being a bodybuilder. with faster shutter speeds, of course, it's with the stabilizer on. 2 modes, one for vertical shaking. What happens in the free hand is a more versatile horizontal one for panning. Personally, I also find it very aesthetically pleasing. sent on April 23, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 35-80mm f/4-5.6 III Pros: Very light, cheap and with a 9 aperture, it has incredible sharpness. And I'm not kidding... Cons: No one can find it for 10 euros. and takes the same photos as a 200 lens... and more euros.. Here, the flaw, at least in mine, is that the focus switch has come off. But I put a piece of scotch tape on it and it works the same. And maybe I could even glue it if I wanted to get rid of the tape. Opinion: I had inherited it together with an old DSLR and I kept it in a drawer because I didn't remember it performing so well. Then I read here that a user says that by closing the aperture the lens becomes sharp and then, what the heck.. I try it... At aperture: 9 I see details of an old postcard that I often use to understand the sharpness of the various optics. Anyway, I saw details of the print that I had never noticed before with other much more expensive and emblazoned optics. I was stunned...! from 7.1 the improvement begins and when the sharpness closes, it increases exponentially... Of course it is a bit limiting to work at f 8 or 9, but if you can this lens at any focal length it makes wonderful photographs and the colors are very beautiful.. Rated 10 !! sent on March 27, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM II Pros: Lightweight, stabilized, fast and quiet autofocus and compatible with focal length duplicator Cons: mine sometimes at 300mm you have to wake up the autofocus, closing the focal length a bit .. Opinion: Rather bright, contained and light optics, it has a precise and fast autofocus. which in case of low light becomes less fast. But I think almost every lens has this problem.. 9 slats and a nice blur at TA . The quality of the lenses is truly remarkable. I have an old canon ef 100 400 is USM L (first type) and it doesn't have the sharpness of this 70 300.. I'm not crazy about the digital display. while stabilization is very effective ! It is not tropicalized and dust has an easy life to enter, it takes care. sent on March 11, 2024 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Simple.. complete.. Internal flash with Master functions. Simple menu.. fast burst.. second-hand price.. Cons: The second card slot is missing. At high ISO there is noise.. Clicking noise.. Opinion: A tank.. indestructible.. as a second camera body, especially for birdlife, it is excellent. 1.6x ratio so you have super tele with normal tele on a full frame. Burst shooting 9 per second.. Good focus.. quite light.. Professional camera with internal flash that acts as master to be able to control other flashes as well. The only flaw is the noise present when exceeding 1000 iso. but probably today it can be removed with software. It has very few artifacts on the edges. for example the 5D mk3 has more.. If it had 10 MPX more, it would still be preferable to any professional camera... As a second body it is ideal. ! sent on February 21, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Lightweight, colors, blurred, fast focus, sharp. Cons: Aesthetically it's not that great. The focus seems perpetually indecisive, but when you shoot, it's in focus at the end. Missing Distance Window Opinion: I got it for a very affordable used price.. I wanted a bright optic and it is.. I wanted good sharpness and it has it. I was hoping for neutral colors and there are.. Only the focus always puzzles me. It always seems like I can't do it, but when you take the picture it's in focus. But maybe this constant weeding consumes the batteries. ? Anyway it's so soft the focus and light the group to move that I think it doesn't affect too much.. You keep it in your pocket and when the light drops dramatically and you don't have the flash behind you. With this lens you can take the photo home without too much trouble. I have another old school 50mm one, but in the end I almost always use this one. If you have to start with a Canon to take photographs and you want to start from a good file level, but there is little money left, used on platforms that allow restitution this is the right lens. sent on January 21, 2024 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Bright as hell, fast and silent autofocus, fabulous boken, bold colors, a real super macro and good for most cases.. Apart from the views clearly, exceptional stabilization perhaps one of the most successful Sigma.. Cons: Maybe it's a bit delicate. You immediately understand that if you fall it's doomed. it must be treated with care. They say to turn off the stabilization before turning off the machine. I never remember to do it and so far he hasn't complained. but apart from this other defects it has none.. Opinion: A real macro from details and it is one of those lenses that you regret not having on the camera when you get the shot of the day, the focus is precise and fast, it hesitates a bit at minimum distances but you just have to move the frame and find the maf.. and fabulous stabilization.. The colors are saturated and the contours are sharp, great optics ! Used can be found at good figures.. New costs a lot.. sent on January 21, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharp, bright, fairly fast and very precise autofocus, precise and pleasant manual focusing, natural colors, among the most natural seen in my lenses. Excellent stabilization and aesthetically pleasing Cons: a slight movement of the front piece, but does not affect the photographs Opinion: An excellent lens, taken used and paid the right amount, it is giving me good satisfaction, it has no particular aberrations and makes a good impression on the machine, an excellent all-rounder .. Sometimes I go out with a backpack full of lenses and this one mounted on the EOS and in the end it stays there for the whole day, not letting you hear the changes in light and settings. Already at full aperture it is sufficiently sharp on the whole photo and tightening even a little gives the best.. I would definitely take it again, value for money , great.. And maybe it doesn't get any better.. They had suggested it to me among many and I am happy to have listened to the suggestion ! sent on January 21, 2024 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: File.. Colors.. ISO can be used up to 3000 without major regrets. Programmable keys... 3 types of raw.. Customizable menus and buttons. adequate screen... ergonomics.. Grip.. velocity.. Tropical.. Robust.. Shutter noises too good.. Accessories available at very low prices. handle type battery, wrap-around cases, batteries etc etc.. Cons: It doesn't have any! at least as far as I could see. Maybe if you really have to find something for him... I would have liked a third wheel opposed to the upper front one for the apertures, but there is the one of the rear set that compensates.. and maybe a customizable viewfinder.. and maybe the buffer which is definitely not the fastest in existence. Today's ones allow for multiple consecutive shots in RAW. The autofocus is not very suitable for birdlife, if there is no contrast it tends to lose the subject, of course it also depends on the lens used. Opinion: Fantastic!!!!!!! Really fantastic camera, I got it used after a 400D and 40D, I also used them and it amazed me and made me want to look for fantastic shots. It consumes normally and in any case depends a lot on the lens used and the time the screen is turned on as well as its brightness. It produces files large enough to be able to crop big, the raw (full, medium and narrow) are really workable all of them well. It has all the important functions and the keys are programmable. With Magic Lantern installed, the functions are amplified with customizations that become enormous even for photography, the video sector does not interest me. Precise soft trigger keys, perfect weight, fantastic grip! in short, the ultimate camera for those who love photography..! sent on January 21, 2024 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro Pros: lightness.. handiness.. faithful colors.. superlative sharpness in the center.. Cons: Slight loss of sharpness at the edges. but light.. And you can't use it with FF it's for APSC sensors Opinion: An optics that amazed me. Compared with other lenses, even emblazoned, Canon Sigma and Tamron (the latter, the Tamron, is not a great lens.. the one I have.. cheap..) as a color it beats them all.. He is very loyal.. Manual focusing is super easy and super soft. The autofocus is quite fast. It's not USM but it's fine. it's a fabulous macro.. at a low cost. and good on several occasions.. No chromatic aberration and I don't see distortion either. I bought it by mistake.. but in the end it's the one I use the most. I definitely recommend it as the first optic to have, then you can specialize, being careful with the used because you make good deals, yes.. but also very bad.. Buy where you can return them. sent on November 10, 2023 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Handiness.. definition.. color.. versatility.. lightness.. Cons: Nothing apart from that it's not also for ff Opinion: Unfortunately I don't know how to remove the review because it refers to the sigma 17 70 f2.8 - 4.5.. and not to this one. For this read the other reviews and excuse me..! A fantastic optics to say the least... Compared to other lenses both Sigma and Canon and Tamron and the colors of this lens are more faithful. without chromatic aberrations.. I thought the 105 macro f2.8 OS HSM had good lenses and treated well.. and it has.. but these have a better treatment. I didn't think that at a relative cost, such clean and contrasty images could come out. Maybe the 2 newer sisters will be even better, I don't know.. but this is superb.. If you could also use it on FF it would be the best.. But there must be something wrong. It costs very little for what it offers. I recommend it without hesitation.. ! sent on November 10, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
