|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Massimiliano Antonello www.juzaphoto.com/p/MassimilianoAntonello  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: 61-point AF, double slot, and barrage silent shutter, quality file, held high ISO, body PRO, tropicalization. Cons: To my way of photographing and my level no appreciable. Opinion: I came from a 600D then speak with the enthusiasm of those who have discovered a new way of seeing the scatto.rnE 'a body of professional and quality undoubtedly with emotions from the first scatto.rnLa gust is enough for any situation in which I found myself (birds do not then I do not pronounce), the presence of the double slot is really helpful and the shot noise at all! rnHa a detail and a seal at high ISO really since before the classe.rnInsomma is really versatile and a reflex that makes you happy owners who like me are a passion of photography principale.rnDa little I combined 85 L II and the results are woow !!! rnIl handle is for sure the most important thing for anyone who takes it for sure with her you can go beyond their limits without fear of reach before those of reflex! rnVoto 10! sent on August 11, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto MT 190 X PRO4 Pros: Solid, Great hub decentrable, Sturdy. Cons: Weight. Opinion: I purchased this excellent model to replace another Manfrotto but not bore the 5/6 kg (God rest his soul). RnDirei really a great tool; the soundness and robustness are its trademark and associated with a good ball head is really great for those like me who are going to mount a maximum of a 5D III over a 70-200.rnContro but is weighted at time of purchase weight, adding that the head is a lot and it makes you feel (I think I will buy one for expeditions in the mountains); it is obvious that the twin carbon eliminates the problem but that I study all the money difference I have not been able to spend ... but really recommended! sent on August 04, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Sharpness, f/2.8 at all focal lengths, L-series construction Cons: Lack Tropicalisation, project now a little dated, a little heavy Opinion: I preferred this version to the stabilized IS II only for the price, while I preferred the Sigma stabilized to a matter of feeling and why I need to events and situations in which subjects are moving and therefore I would not have taken advantage of is the very . rnNonostante the lack of stabilizer images can perfectly sharp and in focus, you just need a little practice, if you are in optimal lighting conditions, however, also take home portraits really fantastic and, for those who are satisfied, you can catch quite well butterflies and various insects. sent on August 07, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, Great versatility, Construction, stabilizer really very effective, accurate and fast AF Cons: Sometimes wish I had one more stop in Opinion: My first L-series, used for now on a 600D (but is in the works a FF), simply another world, it really is a versatile lens due to its focal length and sharpness is very high already at f / 4, closing really becomes a one stop lama.rnCi objectives are certainly more efficient in every aspect that can be analyzed but like everything to do and when you want to travel light in my opinion is really a very good choice. sent on August 07, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
