|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Billo101 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Billo101  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica M-Monochrom Pros: Having a car unique (see review below) rnRisolvenza amazing in terms of ASPH lens; rnScala tonal exaggerated; rnGestione despite high ISO level is equipped with CCD sensor; Cons: Cost; rnScattare only BW; Opinion: The Leica M Monochrom FF is the first digital camera, designed exclusively to generate native images BW. rnih truth they do all the cameras in the world but it is thanks to the RGB matrix (usually Bayer, but there is a Foveon) that are "translated" the colors. In MM has not been done is remove the matrix in order to allow the imprinting of reality in his native language. Not only that, by doing so we obtained a significant increase in resolution, in fact, the pixels are used just for BW image, record the actual luminance values, as also on the M9 there is no AA filter. The noise is much lower due to better management of high ISO (practically insignificant within the 6,400, but more than acceptable) no longer a "problem" as FOUND on M9, finally the result is an extension of the high tone range. In my opinion, the picture that arises is not comparable with one click digital desaturated or otherwise made the BW conversion,the. DNG uncompressed MM is particularly malleable (flat say overseas) ready for every forcing the user wants to go further to be to 36MP? Clearly, this does not mean that we can not do BW level cameras normali.rnHo conducted with respect . RAW generated from the best cameras on the market, not to speak of the person reading it somewhere on the web and in collaboration with Prof friends, and I have not found DSLR that makes me think that. DNG Monochrom were "inferior", for clarity, tonal range or recovery of the shadows. The display, not actually identical to the height of the machine and the M9, I appears as a weak point, because the consulting only to analyze the histogram of the raw data. I then suffered the perception of the data before processing, a real help for the accuracy of the exposure. This represents a difference, ameliorative, in my opinion, than the analog. With MM, it's all very "Franciscan", simple to the extreme, no frills, maybe this is the philosophy of Leica, you reC but I have not yet taken advantage of the famous Whitewall, the press service of the users Monochrom that allows you to make prints on baryta BW always, from the development in the chemical bath silver halide and (say) the prints are on a par if not better than the cousins ??analog printed from negatives. On this point I stop because for the chapter release, and particularly fascinating natural outlet of the files Monochrom, it would take a treaty? RnTornando the machine, the focus is completely manual, aperture priority unless, through the ring just for making focus on all lenses (including those antiwar, they are all compatible?) via telemetry in high precision, especially in situations where AF systems do not engage. The Galilean viewfinder allows the control of the subject during shooting because they do not exist with the rangefinder that moment of darkness SLR at the time of lifting the mirror (person shooting with both eyes open). RnQuanto said, however, is not worth anything if I do not I had made up his mind to think in black and white qhen shooting, this is the turning point of the machine compared to the rest of the considerations. Understanding the scenes in lights and shadows, capture the essence of what they catch, regardless of anything else. Precisely for this reason I have "limited" to only have MM. rnUtilizzo the Monochrom with ASPH lenses, such as 35 APO Summicron Summilux FLE 75 and, more recently, 12 hp, which will surely pull the neck to the sensor and they do make full, the blades are in risolvenza of the details, but also the brush in focus, but also record the metrics in the correct planes of fire, but also dreamlike (perhaps I exaggerate) in conferring those dreamy tunes, as well as very high contrast. rnSu this point, by many, I read reviews of professionals (who are also amateur, but I do not think I could compare them by reading their names?) who prefer the use of spherical optics MM, also third-party brands and sometimes even LTM ( lives with adapter). The images have low contrast and greater (even more! Here really exaggerate?) Tonal range. These readings cC handle or GPS, or make videos). Alternatively, if the design of the Leica resumption Kodak 29MP CCD processor? I falter, although I imagine the costs already iperbolici.rnSi, this is the final part, is expensive? ok, very true, no argument against my part, when we talk about this Leica is the rock prince. In my case I can say that I totally rich, indeed, but my tempter (see dealer) convertivo knowing that 90% of captured images with the M9, has treated me well in the evaluation of the latter, and we have reached a svenarmi purchase agreement without the Monochrom. I honestly weighed the consideration of, unfortunately, inexorable devaluation of the M9 and have also accepted another in exchange by the venditore.rnrnTengo to point out that this is my point of view after nearly 1 year of use, solely the result of my impressions of trials n is in the process of shooting situations than in PP, but they are still an amateur, so what is narrated clearly has no claim to be exhaustive, it tanto less than scientificità.rn sent on December 01, 2013 |
 | Leica M9 / M9-P Pros: Many, perhaps too many, give him a hammer as he did with his Michelangeo Moses. Cons: Managing high ISO (resolved with version Monochrom and M240), do not digest well all SD, battery life limitata.rnCosto Charity is not a counter. Opinion: The essence of a hundred years of history Leica land on FF M9, the M9-P differs only in matters estetiche.rnE 'the machine that makes it better, in my opinion, the color rendering, the most faithful and to realistica.rnCCD low ISO still has today, four years after its launch, the more material you can return, than CMOS version of the 240 is made attuale.rnOttima ASPH lens that spherical, of course the first pull the neck most of the sensor, but the second retain all their charm, especially for lower contrast in BW and more creamy bokeh, especially the Noctilux, 35 and 75Lux of Madleriana memoria.rnGran machine, get one used today can be a bargain, stop wearing Kg and Kg in shoulder DSLR and "change" life. Try it! sent on April 05, 2013 |
 | Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH Pros: From any point of view. Cons: No. Opinion: Optical extraordinary, among the best of invoice Leica ... incredible, TA seems to be f: 8 with an optical level ad Canon or Nikon. Yield blurred, three-dimensional and absolute clarity, steps out fire flame, from the center to the corners even at f: 1.4 does not, vignetting almost 0, fly high in short, is a masterpiece. rnDa prefer the current version FLE, floating elements, the first ASPH, the Olympus ASPHERICAL (2 aspherical lenses grinded by hand ...) and rare costoso.rnIl price seen as a "counter" is to assess the long-term where this kind of lenses do not lose value significantly, in fact, take in used very well. sent on April 05, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
