RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Karateka
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Karateka



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Karateka


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_300_f2-8lCanon EF 300mm f/2.8 L USM

Pros: Sharpness, price of the used, smooth and multiplied speed

Cons: Given the price of the new or used I would say only the weight

Opinion: I bought it used at a good price . I use it with the kenko 2x pro glued night and day. The quality is excellent and quietly compares with optics that cost as much as a studio apartment. Considering the production date and for those who can't spend so much this is the alternative to have a 300 2.8 excellent and a 600 f5.6 multiplied by quality that from the best to f8 and a soft hair to 5.6. I replaced my 400 5.6 just because I'm a shed photographer and because 200mm more i'm comfortable. Not recommended for traveling photography because of its weight that makes itself felt especially with pro bodies. The stabilizer at that price can't be asked at all but thanks to its brightness and the possibility to match pro bodies that can travel even to 3200 iso with excellent quality I would say you do not miss it because you can use times of Security.

sent on November 06, 2019


canon_5dsCanon 5Ds

Pros: Possible strong crop with quality (1.3X and 1.6X). Noise with thin grain only with very high iso but easily manageable. Form af brilliant and with important news that pose justify the purchase. A burst that considers the size of the files easily compares with the 5d3 (1fps less in raw) but with a double amount of data (30Mb vs 80Mb). Absurd file sharpness as long as you take care of the snap phase.

Cons: Battery life for long sessions Requires technical care at the shooting time (that's why at first it was recommended for studio photos) It requires pc discreetly plateral to decrease the processing time of more 'files not suitable for lazy and approximate. Absence Orientable Screen that would bead Hoc in macrophoto , kind of very suitable for this reflex. Difficulty finding it used at a lower price than the new one, but it doesn't directly depend on canon

Opinion: Of this machine I read a lot of reviews and topics but since my considerations I draw from proven proof I decided to go deep considering how in everything what my real needs were.' I consulted sample I viewed and processed a hundred files from iso 100 to iso 6400 from 30sec to 1/8000 from f1.8 to f18 in the ranges I use most. Files worked with ACR and CS5. I believe that juza's review is the only one that really describes this niche machine objectively without taking a priori position, so I would invite you to read it . I use it mainly for naturalistic photography taking advantage of the possibility of crop 1.6x with a 300 2.8 multiplied, thus having a native file of 19mpx of the highest quality. In practice a 600mm can be modulated up to 960mm from 780mm depending on the crop factor chosen. Not suitable for those who are very approximate during the shooting phase because it requires a certain meticulousness in the choice of parameters to best squeeze the sensor avoid the micromove and any spreads. It doesn't even fit branded fanatics. The noise has a more pointy grain than the younger sister easier to handle in pp, however perceptible to eye 10/10imi only from 3200iso. If you want unnecessarily and exaggeratedly clean files switch to another sony or nikon brand with all the pros and cons. Silent shot suitable for naturalistic stalking. Detail of the absurd file as long as you use tricks to avoid micromove and diffraction of the lenses, otherwise you will be disappointed. Interpolation of a 5d3 file will NEVER give you a 5ds file as some claim. We talk about quality of image not beauty or emotions. Trust. Try to believe. The af module also in lv makes it perfect for photo hunting in-weaving but overused by stakeout. Of course it allows a customization according to the scenes filmed,but even here you have to take the trouble to devote a little time. I mean, it's not a machine for everyone. This has led to a sharp devaluation of the used and a difficult availability at fair prices. So I took it as the ultimate camera for the photo hunt to be flanked by the 5d3 and the 7d. Having no intention of reselling it and having found it at an affordable price I am aware that reselling it would be difficult even if I would miss cmq very little. I excluded the 5d4 despite coming with deep satisfaction from a 5d3, because at that price there are no big news that justifies it while remaining a nice car. Let's just say that 5d3 doesn't make you feel the need. If you use L-series optics it's obvious that the SLR will be satisfying, but I think it's an optical law that applies to all other bodies. Here all the more reason because we're talking about a monsterpixel. New machine costing 1100euro (2019) so the evaluation of the used in excellent condition should not exceed 850 euros in my opinion. Those who ask for higher prices than the new have paid as much as a utility on the time, so surely you will have to be able to get before you quit the bone. Tip: Evaluate your real photographic needs the way you take photography and your current kit before proceeding to the purchase .

sent on October 31, 2019


canon_5d3Canon 5D Mark III

Pros: Image caption AF module file multifaceted photo genres Reliability

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: I've been using it since 2012. I would call it my ultimate reflex because in every photographic genre it does well. The gap with the previous 5d series was considerable. Very little noise at high iso up to 3200iso. A great form in naturalistic photography noise reduced appreciable at night. Combined with a good optical park that will make you forget about the market for a while. Processing of the egregia files allows you to recover 3 stops. The price of the used makes it very attractive even today and I think that despite the new market releases the 5d3 defends itself very well. In fact, in my opinion the differences with the older sister 5d4 do not justify the heinous expense to be faced. You have to wait a little longer to justify switching to another reflex of the same series. Very robust ergonomic and easy and intuitive in the menus' It's one of those bodies that I will definitely not resell because it is a must . With this Reflex Canon has written a revolutionary page of his history.

sent on October 30, 2019


dji_phantom_4proDJI Phantom 4 Pro

Pros: Construction quality, reliability of navigation systems, easy and intuitive from the first approach Facilitates to find new and used parts, Camera quality and 4k video,iso estate,dynamic range,

Cons: Transport box a little cumbersome Bulky Radiocontrol cumbersome

Opinion: Bought used as the first drone after a long and meticulous evaluation of the pros and cons. 1 year between research reviews and field trials to find the ultimate drone at an affordable price. From the first use with all the precautions of the case it turned out to be easy intuitive and reliable not a small thing for those who have never had such experiences. This definitely avoids the gavetta with drones elated by 100 euros that as well as being bad can become dangerous qnche. I only use manual flight to have more control of the system and to increase reliability. I took it for aerial photography and it proved to be up to par, with its 20mpx on the sensor of this size. I've quietly printed up to 120 to 80cm with optimal quality. It will be possible to shoot in breathing to make long exposures of a few seconds thanks to its stability. High iso yield iso very good and rich detail for its sensor. Ability to shoot in raw and get after good raw workflow excellent results worthy of more expensive sensors. Light when considering the gimbal equipment and multirotors. Easy to carry without box you take it with one hand. Battery life 28 min more than enough for a scheduled photo session. The stabilization on 3 axes is phenomenal it doesn't even seem to be moving when you fly. Fundamental anti-collision sensors that do their job well. Not very quiet with its standard eliches but there are commercially available heliths that reduce lift but slow down in-flight performance. You don't feel the need if you don't work in the secret services, but it can be useful to locate the drone in flight, when the distances become risky. Quick response to commands , use 2 frequencies 2.4ghz and 5.8 to choose depending on the interference. Impressive the quality of the very fluid videos with a return of the colors and contrasts more vivid of the mavic 2pro. Ability to set the parameters comfortably from the application djgo4. The only mandatory advice remains before any flight check according to the manual all the steps for safety. This will prevent malicious crashes and ensure safety for yourself and others as far as possible. Preferable to the mavic series that from its has only the small footprint (in my opinion and also according to the opinions of dated aeromodelists). The rest is unrelated. Old school and old body after 4 editions the DJ ph can safely say that he has reached the top of the range especially with the djph4 pro v.2 The mavic will do it maybe at the 4th edition but sincere with the line that is going through I do not think so. With winds of up to 30km h the phantom 4 pro in flight gps does not accuse anything that it is not able to handle. The mavic 2 I've seen him fall in altitude and lose stability or hold (like a bird wounded by hunters) with a simple run of my son and although it offers less resistance to gusts, its weight and its shell do not allow it a solid stability. In addition, the price of the used guarantees to take home a valid tool. Despite the release of the mavic 2pro the djph4 has not known to be less than used because at half the price there is a higher quality. The price of the used seems stabilized considering that it is out of production and despite being replaced by the mavic series. Synonymous that still many prefer it as quality of materials and photographic. I would recommend direct evidence before the purchase if there is a chance. Especially for those who are novice and for those who want to fly in extreme weather conditions or windy weather will immediately realize that the phantom has jokers that mavic can't have . Djph4pro all my life.

sent on October 10, 2019




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me