|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Riccà www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ricca2  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z6 Pros: Evf, lcd, ergonomics, menu. Cons: Low-light AF, single slot, exposure compensation button, few third-party lenses, no internal 10-bit video. I took it used to 800, but I would never pay 2000 and passes eur for certain objects. Opinion: After 2 years of use I can say that I know it quite well. I have tried / had several cars in the same price range and the z6 is certainly the best done. It is a balanced machine and churns out excellent files. Evf excellent, when I switched from SLR to ml after not even half a day I got used to the electronic viewfinder. Large and quality touch display, intuitive menu, perfect ergonomics Despite being smaller and lighter than the d750 it has a top grip. Against All these great advances af side compared to SLRs I have not seen them. In optimal conditions the af is fine, but as soon as it goes down the light becomes less reliable. I find the position of the comp. exposure button uncomfortable. After two years I still can't catch him on the fly. Ridiculous the single slot , despite never having had problems with the xqd. Few third-party optics. sent on September 13, 2022 |
 | Nikon Z 85mm f/1.8 S Pros: Image quality, af speed, sharpness, good blurry but not at the levels of sigma art. Cons: Price, size. Sharpness is not all lacking a bit of character Opinion: I agree with the reviews of other users. An excellent optics. Nice blurred even if not at sigma levels, fast and quiet af. Bought, sold, at the beginning I preferred sigma art, then for a matter of weight I bought it back and now it is my favorite optics. Perfect for portraits, but I also often use it for street. I took it used but new costs maybe a little too much. sent on September 04, 2021 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: construction Cons: Everything else in particular focus (inaccurate) Opinion: I used the reflex version on Z6. It is true that to use certain extreme goals you need an experienced hand, which I do not have, but I do not really understand the positive reviews. I did not appreciate any of this objective. I tried 3 different specimens, 2 with the red ring one with golden ring and found them both mediocre. In my opinion, it makes no sense to spend 200-250eur on such a goal. From a few days to the same figure I took the 16mm of nikon and it is spectacular. sent on July 03, 2021 |
 | Panasonic S5 Pros: stabilization, ergonomics, video side really offers so much Cons: small and poor quality viewfinder/evf, burst, not very reliable af c, unseparated photo/video settings, micro hdmi Opinion: Great for video, definitely the best of the average difascia machines, a little less good for photography. Apart from the flurry, only 6fps, and AFC lagging behind the competition, to the poor quality of the viewfinder unfortunately I could not get used to it. If with the Z6 my eyes never get tired, with the S5 but also with the Sony A7iii after half an hour they start to tear. The perfect hybrid under 2000 does not yet exist. sent on November 25, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
