|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fastgiaco www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fastgiaco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Optical professional, robust, a real tank, tropical conditions and remarkable performance. Superlative image quality. Cons: Heavy and certainly not very affordable price. Opinion: It 'optics that solves most of the situations faced by a sports photographer but also of reportage. The AF is lightning-fast and precise, especially with performance machines is a real chip. The quality is excellent at room temperature, I would say better than closing 1 or 2 stops. Without testing (I do not like) the quality seemed a hair better (200 mm.) 200 2.8 even though I've owned. The colors are beautiful, chromatic aberration, even in strong backlight, is more than acceptable, as well as the vignetting disappears at room temperature and closes to 1.1 / 2 stop. The bokeh despite the optical design has many lenses are soft and comfortable. E 'was exceeded only by the MKII for sale although for many years, but its has a lower price which, although high, is affordable. In short, a perspective that gets hard to sell sent on October 01, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro Pros: Optical light affordable and efficient. f not lightning. Cons: Performs at a 1:1 ratio but stops at 0.5. To arrive at a 1:1 ratio needs a special converter but it costs almost as much as the optics. Opinion: I've had this lens for a long time that I used mainly as "normal". At short distances is very sharp as indeed its definition is, even at medium distances and infinity sharpness and engraving remain tangible. It has aberrazionui color and distortion is virtually absent. While the focus is extended considerably without causing imbalances being very light optics. If you do not need a larger opening can be a good substitute as optical "normal" On occasions I regret having given it away, I think it's a perspective underestimated. sent on October 01, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Superb Optics by definition, color and cost. Cons: Not riescoi prorpio to find! perhaps the lack of sealing, but just to be overly picky. Opinion: It 'was my first zoom 70/200L maybe I was one of the first to buy it (if nliron mistake in 1996). I paid the beauty of 2,000,000 million lire + the cost of the collar (which even then giving away ...) but when I took the first slide with the mind, the "choked" by spending passed me immediately. Beautiful colors, chromatic aberration ... nothing! lightweight, lightning-fast and precise autofocus, in short, a true champion. The fluorite lens did its dirty work and did it to the max! Note that the lens is in fluo in 2.8 was added only with the version II. When, some time later I read the magazines test / comparison with the 2.8 (is not) and I saw that not only was all'alteza .4 f, but it was even a little, than the displeasure of I had to spend all that money was reduced further. I kept it for many years and only came out when the harrier 2.8 is the bianchino privai me, not because considerassi is the lack of a defect, because at that time there were few is. I needed 2.8, took the opportunity and bought. The biachino but I remained in my heart, so much so that if the opportunity presents itself do not hesitate to pay farmleo from friends because such a quality enclosed in a lightweight and high-performance telephoto AF, the other brand if the dream (without triggering any controversy, only for the sake of truth!) sent on September 26, 2011 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Robust and pixels / format very guessed. Image quality is still superb and compared to more recent machines. Cons: Lack of sealing, continuous slow, not very handsome and precise AF in low light, lack of micro adjustment for goals. White balance AUTO. Opinion: Building solid, and also ergonomic. As I said tropicalization lacks, however I tested in the rain (sport), without protection of any kind, every now and then drying it with chamois leather and the car did not turn a hair, a sign that the project is well done and able to work outside his field (ceremony, concerts, landscapes, studio). The AF is slow to photograph birds, sports, and all those fields in which the AF speed is essential, however, setting the center point with the 4 AF assist greatly improves both speed and accuracy that allows you to do also photographs of sports. I, unlike many, it is the excellent performance even beyond the ISO 1600, the "grain" is very similar to that of the films. A 3200 ISO (see to believe some pictures of my portfolio), chroma noise prevails over the luminance but may be easily removed without damaging the detail, the luminance is never too intrusive, especially when the light is not too little. The quality and the workability of the files are wonderful keeping head still very latest machines, color quality especially with "true and fair" ... it is really ... faithful! and also in "landscape" colors are never too bright or intrusive. The auto white balance is perhaps one of the sore spots, but nothing unrecoverable with the white point, or at least with a color temperature. Well, considering it with the benefit of hindsight (today) there are much newer machines with more useful features, see AF ??micro adjustment, display much sharper, faster burst and the possibility of higher sensitivity, but when you consider that the machine is Output 6 years ago! must recognize that the overall quality was, and still is, amazing. They are so convinced of what I say that despite having about 5 years ago and having tried the MKII in a couple of occasions in fashion shows (machine obviously more handsome della MKI) still have not found sufficient reasons to replace it. Maybe I will when it comes out the MKII or perhaps compererò the MKII will cost far less ... or maybe I'll keep still for long! sent on September 09, 2011 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Camera robust, ergonomically well designed (at least for my hands) burst setting possibilities, viewfinder with 100% coverage and a magnification 1, very important to me. Buffer emptying rate and # of shots in RAW. Appropriate price to quality, tropicalization. Cons: Sensor too "full" some MPX (4/5?) Less does not hurt anyone. At high ISO can not find all this noise (maybe because I'm happy?) But the files are not easy, at least for me ... PS I do not use much and I'm used to the old 5d, to work with. Difficulty of finding the appropriate settings to the way I shoot, I find that the forwarding sensor is very sensitive to the "quality" and quantity "of light. A very low level of light but similar, the yield is variable depending on the situation and color to color: Sometimes it very well, others very bad and I do not speak only of the reds that are not very pleasing to the digital sensors but also of other colors. So I find it a very well engineered car at the level of recovery and not just "mechanics" but that does not give a lot of confidence and then when you are convinced of having "tamed" you realize that you still qualchecosa to discover. It 's true that not doing photo hunt (for which the 7D has been conceived), but sports and theater (then with large subjects) are not as well suited to review it. Opinion: It 'a machine that would not recommend to those who are the first (and possibly the second) weapons, but I agree with those who say that it is one of (if not the) most successful aps-c Canon. If the second release semplificassero some settings and jumping off the AF even more precise perhaps it would be perfect. However I do not regret having bought and absolutely, in my opinion, coupled with 5 (MKI and MKII) form a perfect match. sent on August 16, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
