|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pisolomau www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pisolomau  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 100D Pros: Small and lightweight, with pancake 40mm fits comfortably in your pocket, touch screen 3 "high-resolution, 1080p movies with Hybrid CMOS AF II (continuous focus during filming), excellent metering system, simple but very fast AF and precise sensor with great detail and fully usable up to 1600 ISO, convenient small built-in flash, great white balance than the Canon tradition. Cons: Noise present in the shadows even at low ISO (but much less than the 7D), gust poor, not too ergonomic grip for those with big hands, Continuous AF during video shooting is not very fast, lack of vision of 100% a touch, limited duration of the battery (about 300 shots), plastic very "cheap." Opinion: Impressions of use decidedly positive, I have used the 18-55 stm that little monster by 40 mm f / 2,8. With the latter, the yield is truly spectacular. The lens of the kit is good, but obviously stops them (given the price), the construction is a little leggerina, good non-slip rubber handle for those with small hands, the car with the kit lens is really light , with 40 mm mounted slips easily in your pocket or purse. Horrendous and cheap plastics used by canon that now are not changed since the 350D ... A rough plastic of which remains attached all the dead skin of the fingers is a sort of "scrub" free. True that then you clean, but I always found annoying to the touch and sight. rnrnIl sensor is in my opinion better than the 7D, a hair more dynamic and less noise. I shot indoors with good lighting, up to 2000 ISO is acceptable, color noise content and grain dry with lightroom and 15-20 points luminance reduction remains a good cleaning and detailncora good. In addition it is better not to go, but this applies to all APSC, having the 5DII the comparison is merciless. rnrn18 mpx are many, but they give you a nice detail, especially on images taken close up, macro and portraits are not a problem and the plasticky 18-55 STM pulls the center excellent definition. It is the unfortunate tendency of this family of sensors to have the shadows noisy even with low sensitivity, especially when they are opened, and of course, better to expose to the right and retrieve luci.rnrnTutte considerations for a raw file with all the newfangled reset (noise reduction in Room and optimization of light strictly off ...) rnrnL'AF I liked it very much, fast and accurate, has not missed a shot, even in good light lateral work well. The viewfinder is decent, certainly better than the 350-400D. The complete info and the convenience of having everything can be set with the touch screen Q is a nice added value, use it is really a pleasure. rnrnComodissimo the touch screen, it does pretty much youtto with your fingers as one smartphone.rnDi high quality movies in HD with the convenience of continuous focus. Passing from one subject in the foreground to the background, the focus gradually changes from one floor to another with cinema effect significant, even though it is a bit slow. Whisper quiet the engine of STM 18-55. A must an external microphone, the internal monaural just sufficiente.rnrnInsomma, if you need a good machine as a second body to always bring below, the flea is perfect! We only hope that other mom Canon face pancake, like a 22 mm f / 1,8 and a small tele macro. Then it would be a big party, baby carrier and go!! sent on July 01, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Sharp, saturated colors, very usable range of focal lengths, distortion almost nothing, good construction, light weight, excellent resistance to flare (even with the sun in the frame) Cons: Not excellent sharpness at the edges at wide apertures, is expensive. Opinion: It 'a lens that APSC replica of the classic wide-angle zoom for FF 16-35, indispensable in landscape photography. A small apertures (f / 8 and up) is sharp from edge to edge and the best. The colors do not regret the L series and above are well saturated, so as to make sometimes unnecessary use of the polarizer. Someone whispers that the couple APSC +10-22 is better in the picture landscape of the classic 16-35 (or 17-40) on FF. I can definitely say that he does not regret. It has a big rival (the Sigma 10-20) that costs less and seems to have similar performance. I tried the Sigma after I chose the Canon sharper in my opinion, especially at the edges and colors less warm Sigma (which I never liked too). The big advantage of this lens is that you can pick the backlight wildest relying on a flare very low or almost absent. Great, therefore, when used in night shots. A 10 mm has a very low distortion which further reduces the focal more. If you do not like the exasperation of a 8-16 mm wide zoom lens this is the one for you. The only flaw, an excessive cost (but it has a good seal on the market). sent on September 27, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, color, contrast, light, fast AF, strength and construction to the top, stabilizer efficient. Cons: No Opinion: Without mincing words is the best in its class, excellent weight / performance ratio, constant aperture, sharp at all focal lengths and apertures, a true champion! If you are not interested in higher brightness, with just under 1000 euro you bring home a beautiful lens and you can (something important and often underestimated) take with you, given its lightweight. APSC of its range of focal also allows to use it for birds. A lens which will hardly be separated. Defects? For me, no. sent on September 26, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Lightweight and compact, good range of focal lengths, stabilizer super, excellent color rendering and micro-contrast, robust, accurate and fast AF, weather sealed. Cons: Distortion at 24 mm (especially on FF), AC TA in bright edges, vignetting at room temperature (especially on FF), suffers flare. Opinion: An excellent all-rounder, especially on FF which earns a good wide angle. I use it with great satisfaction for my travels on 30D. Sturdy as a tank, it lends itself to all kinds of photos, from landscape to portrait. It 'a lens that would be perfect if it had a better resistance to flare and it was a bit more crisp than 105 mm. with a little less distortion at 24 mm would be perfect even on FF where ivece, in my opinion, suffers more than that of APSC. I look forward to a markII that corrects these faults (venial). For me, a best buy ever. sent on September 24, 2011 |
 | Canon 30D Pros: Sturdy and reliable, excellent image quality, extremely clean files generated even at high ISO, excellent dynamic range, ergonomics, ease of use, battery life. Cons: Displays with poor resolution, ISO invisible (visible only after pressing a key). Opinion: The 30D is my current SLR, accompanied me in all my travels in Nepal, Ladakh, India, Patagonia, Greece, Turkey, Morocco, as well as the mountains that usually attend. What I appreciate most about this camera is the extreme robustness and consistency of performance, even in extreme conditions (cold, heat, humidity dust). Furthermore, it is relatively lightweight and compact and has, as all Canon, a good ergonomic use. Another point in its favor is the extreme cleanliness of the files can also be used in high iso. The metering system is balanced although personally I keep almost always set a +1 / 3. The Af is honest, it is not lightning but it is difficult to miss a shot. Show the string action in the photos but it is understandable given the age of the system (today is obviously better). The dynamic range is very high and provides excellent performance even in critical light conditions. The battery life is great (about 800 shots), a great advantage on long trips where there is little chance of charging. The only faults (venial sins) is a really poor display as the definition and the lack of visualization of the iso (to see them you have to press a button). I use it exclusively in RAW so the quality of the jpeg, which is still good, is not a priority for me. In over 4 years of hard use has never experienced a problem and for me this is his real strength. If you want a camera robust, reliable and excellent image quality, the 30D is your ideal companion. sent on July 18, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
