|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Come Sempre www.juzaphoto.com/p/ComeSempre  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sainsonic Kamlan 50mm f/1.1 Pros: opening, size, solid construction, lampshade included in the price, optical yield Cons: diaphragms' diaphragms, chromatic aberrations Opinion: bought during the lock-down for the covid19 as a toy to pass me the time. tried on sony a6000. the diaphragms' diaphragms' dial is fluid, but precise, and makes it less difficult to focus at f/1.1 especially with the help of focus peaking. On the other hand, however, the diaphragms' diaphragms are deceitful, in my opinion it is a major defect if you shoot freehand or at night, since you risk accidentally changing the set opening (especially on such a compact lens). regarding optical yield, I found myself in front of a lens with a very "particular" yield. at f/1.1 the blurring is very soft, but despite the chromatic aberrations, the optical yield is still fully acceptable, closing from f/2.8 onwards becomes quite sharp and the aberrations are greatly reduced. p.s. I reviewed the first version. a second, sharper version with a smaller, but larger, minimum focus distance has recently been released sent on July 16, 2020 |
 | AmazonBasics Treppiede leggero 152cm Pros: light and fast to open Cons: poor plastic head Opinion: useful only if you use remote controls. even if you set a 10-second timer, the tripod's head continues to swing. the structure at the end of the day is acceptable considering the price if it were not that the central column trembles as if there was no tomorrow, not recommended even for videos because at the slightest vibration the head begins to vibrate. sent on December 25, 2019 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX410 IS Pros: focal excursion; compactness; good resolution; beautiful colors; Stabilization Cons: too many; only snaps in jpeg; already at 400 iso begins to lose shots; indecent focus; indecent optical rendering Opinion: very comfortable, I would recommend it only to those who have just started or to those who want to tinker without being afraid to throw money (used on ebay I saw it under 80 degrees) I used it a lot and I squeezed it over all its limits and I can say that if you have a little patience you can get us out of the something, if you use any compact canon I recommend using the CHDK to handcuff us. If you have good skills you will get great photos thanks to the great focal excursion (24-960). at night is unusable for obvious reasons. At the end of the day the only reason to have something like this is because of the focal excursion as as image quality most new phones do better sent on December 25, 2019 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: files quality; focus; good evf; iso estate; compactness; lightness; interfaceable commands; installable apps Cons: an extra dial would have been perfect; eye af not available in af-c; The mode ring could be better interfaced Opinion: the first mirrorless interchangeable optics I put my hand on. focus to envy many reflexes, many complain about ergonomics but if you buy this kind of machines it's because you want compactness, you feel like a panasonic and your hands are comfortable. always about ergonomics I found myself better with the a6000 than many other cameras because I have thin fingers. Many complain about chaotic menus but I found them more comfortable than canon ones (I have never been a big fan of user-friendly interfaces) but I understand that for less geeky users it is not pleasant, while with the viewfinder I found myself excellent. speaking of technical data the 24 megapixels are enough to crop pushed. the focus is very responsive and even tracking is still decent, the only thing is that you can not use the eye af in af-c forcing you to use the af-s (commercialized to sell more a6300) raw file produced by the camera (extension . ARW) should theoretically have a lossy compression, despite the fact that the produced file holds unthinkable recoveries in the past on apsc. the high yield in my opinion you should represent by comparison, but in a review it is not possible so I will just say what everyone says. works well up to 1600 iso, with the right lights it goes to 3200. with a good noise reduction and black and white I went even further. also to remember the mega burst of 11fps, but I use little during my shots. and remember the ability to adapt any vintage lens thanks to the 18mm draw. in my opinion the a6000 is good for everyone, from the professional looking for a second light and economic body to the neophyte that only starts in automatic mode and that you want to insert in the sector, to the geek who wants to experiment with fixed goals and apps sent on December 25, 2019 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: super compact; power zoom; excellent optical performance for a kit lens; price; focus; Stabilization Cons: distorts and vignettes at 16mm; some little chromatic aberration Opinion: If you bought a sony with this lens avoid selling it. it is extraordinarily small and does not take up space in the bag (sometimes I put it in the pocket of the jacket to have it at hand) and unlike what many said, it has a good optical yield, especially in relation to the price at which it is offered. moreover compared to the classic 18-55 canon and nikon on which I put my hand this lens is more versatile. It's great for video thanks to the power zoom that allows you to control it even from a distance. autofocus is fine and same thing about stabilization. Moving on to the sore notes... vignette and distorts at 16mm, if you make videos or taken in jpeg you do not even notice, since the machine corrects all the defects of the lens. If you shoot in raw just let photoshop or lightroom do the same fixes. absolutely to have, even just as a backup lens sent on December 25, 2019 |
 | Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Pros: building materials; fast and silent focus; light; compact; Stabilization Cons: lack of sharpness; price without discounts; you have to understand it to make good shots Opinion: I took this lens during Black Friday on amazon taking advantage of the cashback sony, as a result I paid 150 euros. as soon as mounted I was amazed by the silence of the focus (so much so that my father asked me if he was an ultrasonic). The fact that it is lack of light I do not consider it a flaw because it is a kit lens at the end of the day. after the first tests I was left with bitterness in the mouth, very little sharpness (in comparison the canon 55-250 stm looks like an L series) and chromatic aberrations that make it difficult to photograph small subjects in the backlight. After a few days of use you learn to use and appreciate it because it is not a lens to throw away. it's convenient to use, and as long as you don't exaggerate with the crop it has a decent yield. in conclusion if you find it under 200 euros is a must-have because in combination with 16-50 you are covered at all the focal points with very little expense and a lot of compactness. otherwise if you have a bigger budget bet on 18-135 mm or 70-200 f4 if you are ambitious EDIT: now the 70-350 that represents a quality alternative if you have a higher budget sent on December 25, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
