|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maur.ju www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maur.ju  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 800mm f/5.6 L IS USM Pros: Transportability considered the focal length of 800mm, sharpness, stabilization Cons: Price Opinion: I have had the opportunity to try this lens for a long time before making a concrete idea of ??its value and potential.rnConsidered the 800mm focal length, its weight makes it an object still very transportable, I used it on monopod, not even of excellent quality and he gave me exceptional images. In my opinion it is not correct, as some assert, that it is mandatory to use the tripod at any cost ... certainly not an optical for photos on the fly to the swallows throughout the day ... you would die of fatigue! RnAt the beginning I was very suspicious of this focal point, but after having tested it I must say that my assumptions were without foundation and completely preconceived. I verified a sharpness at the highest levels, as you can expect from a professional lens of CANON L series, at the height of the younger brothers 600 and 500 mm.rnThe stabilization works as if it were a much lighter and shorter focal lens, very fast and precisissima.rnOvvio that if you do bird life, you're unlikely to be able to get offunder times longer than 1/2500 sec, the objective is a blade ... gives images engraved and super-detailed, but of course it can not digest the blur. Speech valid for both FF and APS-C.rnOne of the advantages that I have most appreciated is that, with a camouflage poncho I wear, you are able to photograph where you want without the dependence on the hut and keeping towards the animal a greater distance respect of his privacy, almost never invading and disturbing the so-called safe distance that allows the animal not to be bothered. rnThe price is a drain, buy it new really challenging, a madness that you can think of doing if you miss, as I miss, a few wheels. sent on December 11, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Stabilizer, ratio between first and second non-exaggerated focal points, sharpness at all focal lengths, standard hood, robustness and constructive quality Cons: For now I have not noticed Opinion: I have this optic for 48 hours, so my opinion and review should be considered very partial and approximate at the moment. I did a total of 20 shots in different lighting conditions and environments with my 7D Mark II, using both extreme focal points, 16 and 35 mm, both F4 and F8 and F11.rnStrabilizing the sharpness even shown at F4, I reviewed all the photos on my IPS 27 monitor by zooming to 100%. I do not know if I was very lucky with the specimen In my hands, but frankly, the sharpness of this zoom touches the quality of a fixed optic at all openings. INever used 1740L, good quality optics and excellent construction, but no comparison in terms of sharpness. The stabilizer allows you to increase the time at very long, otherwise unusable values, but Vs hand is still the essential tool. For my needs, F4 brightness can be enough. The weight of the optics feels but not We can expect constructive quality, tropicalization and robustness without weight.rnI will continue to test it in the coming weeks and I will let you know. For now finished Phase 1 of my show. sent on July 08, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness at all focal lengths, stabilizer 4 very effective REAL stop, versatility of use. Great alternative on APS-C who needs no focal long. fast AF Cons: If it had been F4 at all focal CANON would have dug the market Opinion: I do nature photography with longer focal lengths, but every time I needed a versatile lens to use freehand in the forest or in short spaces and unplanned, constantly rediscover the quality of this light. The autofocus is the height of a number L, the stabilizer is impressive, steady images and allows many sins to my hand not always steadfast. Sharpness at the highest level, I never go over F8 - F11, I always feel that the quality of the picture worse when I push myself to smaller apertures. The weight is not excessive, it is commensurate with an objective to tropical robust execution. Well-sized lens hood. For those who want to duplicate it recommend the Kenko 1.4x DGX Pro300, for those who wish to learn I posted a detailed proof in the specific site section Juza. It 'a lens that by its brightness will never be praised by professional photographer. If the Canon had made a constant F4at all focal lengths, he dug out the market. If we had done a 70-300 F2.8 constant ... open up the sky, you say ... fiction ??? This is crazy !!! Mah! I daydream a photographer, so ... do not pretend that some reflections have their feet planted on the ground sent on February 13, 2016 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Held at high ISO up to 4000Iso without degradation, AF 65 points, double-slot CF and SD, 10 fps burst, GPS Cons: Lack of Wi-Fi Opinion: I own this car for two months, I sell the 7D, I must say that after reading and documented myself a lot, I have not found anything difficult for its use. The 'AF is his strong point and its yield at high ISO in an almost from 1DX are the reasons why there is compra.rnÈ true that his manual can scare someone for its 500 p., But is a true pleasure to experience the power and effectiveness of an AF system truly professional. I put it to the test with the agile 400 mm F5.6 L of photos of birds in flight, and the results were at the height of the aspettative.rnMa 7D Mark II does not stop there, the dual slots for CF and SD the It makes a flagship with a strong character seeds / professionale.rnAvendo used the 5D Mark III to a friend, I have not found her menu so indigestible as someone ... forums and sharing of experiences on social networks help to speed learning and understanding .rnCapisco very little of Canon choose not to implement the WiFi maybe just because av ...would further weighed on the performance of the battery, the car is a Ferrari that does not want to hear to make fuel economy of battery ... The two Digic6 feel eccome.rnAd however, could not enable the GPS we could think to enable / disable Also WiFi sent on November 15, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: AF fast, excellent construction, crystal clear, optically perfect Cons: without stabilization Opinion: A simply stunning optical quality of the shots that returns. If Canon had provisto of stabilization, would not be able to keep up with sales. I am also a proud owner of a 500 F4 L USM II, however, I decided not to sell the 400 F5.6 because an optical light and portable in this way, can not be beat for portability and shooting opportunities in the Forest in short spaces, such as long sent on November 17, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS II USM Pros: AF speed, sharpness and precision, weight, function 'Preset Focus Cons: I do not know Opinion: Very difficult to be able to speak to this point in a balanced way. I used it two days in a row, 10 hours a day before acquistarla.rnQualità 'image beyond all desire, a precise blade for quality' awesome. Functions livellio and category such as storing a point of focus (function 'Preset) .rnIl selector distance focusing step includes well-balanced, I use it when no problema.rnL'ho Full tested with the telextender 1.4X series III as' excellent, fast AF and stabilizer yet efficient ... "almost" as averlo.rnIl result is 700 mm for highly efficient focale.rnIl wonderful weight, a perspective like this, F4, could not weigh less than this', although the 3.2kg remain an important number, but the quality is not "light". Compare it to his brother Nikon and you give yourself every spiegazione.rnLo use with a one-foot lightweight and slim, giving it the necessary support, to use it on birds in flight we still want to arms, is up to you decidere many clicks can you do before stancarvi.rnAnch'io I preferred the 600 F4 to the size and weight of the latter, from the slits of a shed with 500 managed to come out with the tube, often with a 600 No, because excessive diameter dell'ottica.rnIl price, what to say ... It's crazy to unbalanced, but if you really have the desire to experience out of the ordinary, and managed to convince vs psyche that "yesterday you got the money for If on a sidewalk, "I invite everyone to take this" amazing "goal is to let go of any alternative !!! sent on November 16, 2014 |
 | Canon 1200D Pros: Price and Basic Features Cons: Lack of simple functions such as lifting anticipated mirror and other small things that would have been at no cost. Opinion: E 'clearly a super entry level product, but well done. Plastic body, one could not expect more for certain what costa.rnOttima choice as a second camera body or as the body of the rescue. Excellent for example, if associated with a wide-angle or a second optical drive. The battery is small but at first use however, it seems hard enough for a day of intensive use and never allow to leave a piedi.rnIl body is light, an important advantage for those who do not like heavy bodies. The colors, the noise in the photos, even at high ISO, it is very tollerabile.rnRipeto, it would be silly to compare it with bodies labeled, but in my opinion is defended very well in his field sent on October 04, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Light weight, high quality materials that express strength, tropicalization, softness and engraving depending on how you take advantage of the diaphragm. Minimum focus distance of 28 cm. Cons: No one Opinion: Using this lens on CANON 7D so I have not been able to experience the distortion that someone points out FF.rnL 'I bought it because the reviews on FF they still believe and why I did not find in these focal lengths and experienced anything better. The lens is a bit 'dated as construction, its design has now 10 years, but the quality is there and all without compromessi.rnMi surprised by the yield at the minimum distance of focus, giving me the opportunity to do the "modest" almost macro photo quality but superba.rnDopo that, if you look at how wonderfully it is used by Catherine Bruzzone you realize how landscapes are kissed by this goal! It is not stabilized but at these focal lengths is practically impossible to feel the need. Canon has perhaps thought in this direction. sent on November 15, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
