|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
DumbJames www.juzaphoto.com/p/DumbJames  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D200 Pros: Construction, Dynamic Range,File Size,Physical Keys Placed at the Right Point Cons: I would say the high iso, but at the price at which it is sold it performs better than the entry levels found on amazon Opinion: Gifted by my father 5 years ago, it was my first reflex. With her I took about 70,000 photos, before giving it to a friend of mine. After a year with Canon, I decided to trade my 40d to get it back. Because this isn't a SLR. This is LA reflex. I will not talk about technical specifications or anything, but I just want to praise this machine, which after almost 13 years since its launch on the market, still knows how to give a lot of satisfaction. Don't be fooled by the 24mpx of the new nikon Reflex, and don't be intimidated by the 2006 specs. With its magnesium body and keys in the right place, you will learn the art of photography professionally, without spending a capital. For 200 euros, you can take it home with a 50mm 1.8, so you can have fun with all kinds of photos: marriage, landscape,naturalistic,sports,portraiture, street etc... this machine is not afraid of anything. If I were to find a defect of it are the high iso, but the grain is pleasant and that's enough. I think when it stops working, I'll buy another one, because she and the d700 are the VERE reflex, because they are those machines that do not suffer from the passing of the years( to say, the 40d had a bad autofocus and a dynamic range to tear off the hair). I conclude by saying that if you're a novice, this is the car for you. sent on October 15, 2019 |
 | Canon 600D Pros: Good image quality, adjustable screen, compatibility with most canon optics, attractive price ratio, battery life Cons: Low ISO hold But besides this to start it's fine Opinion: My dear 600d... Where to start? Coming from the glorious d200 of Nikon, I was looking for a cheap car but doing its job. I was looking for an SLR machine that could make me take pictures of good quality, coupled with a decent video compartment without spending a fortune. Bought at 250 euros with matched the Canon 50mm f 1.8 (resold immediately), this machine has given me a lot of satisfaction. Perfect for beginners who look to the world of photography, but also to enthusiasts who do not want to spend a capital. The 18 megapixels are more than enough to give away fantastic shots, and counting that on the market you can find on the market the 4000d with the same sensor but at a worse build quality and with many waids, this makes you think about the importance of choosing well the Own outfit. For the video side nothing to say... 24 fps are perfect and sinceramnte give up the 60 of the 200d I do not see such a great suffering. The only negative notes I can give him is certainly the low tightness at high ISO: Try not to go beyond the 800 (personal experience, trying to shoot in a room at 1600, I had a hard time to post produce the photos). But In addition to this I assure you that you will not be disappointed by your purchase, especially if you are fledgling. I will keep it until I have enough money to spend on a 6d mark II, but until then I will always keep it with me. I hope I was helpful sent on April 06, 2019 |
 | Canon 4000D Pros: compactness, economical, perfect entry-Evel, autonomy Cons: High ISO hard to use, choice of semi-justified materials Opinion: I'm starting by saying it's not my first car. I started with my dear D200 of Nikon, then I switched to the Canon 70d (always favorite SLR), and now I work with a Fujifilm Xt-1. But for some time I was looking for an economical machine to use as a reserve for risky situations, so as not to damage my mirrorless. The choice fell on the 4000d, given the aggressive price, and the specs very similar to the Canon 70d. Reading online I found sites that attack this room Manco had crucified Jesus, but I can confirm that for the price to which it is sold, you can not find better: compact, always ready to use, autonomy at the top, in short a real machine Perfect for those who face the world of photography. Only a few things have made me twist my nose: 1-Materials: I understand the want to save, but the plastic attack for the lenses surprised me in a negative way. 2-Ring for the modes: I would have liked a dedicated ON/off button rather than an "off" mode. 3-ISO: Never and I repeat never use it over the 3200, you only risk to occupy memory with photos with a horrible noise and a quality similar to the photos at the beginning 900. I am still undecided on the videos, and I did not feel to express an opinion. In conclusion I really satisfied this little girl, and I'll keep it for a while ' second machine. But if you want some more benefits (obviously spending a few hundred euros) I would recommend to go on 200d (not the 2000d), seen the most powerful sensor and materials decidedly more "Consoni". But of course as mentioned above, the price makes it unbeatable in today's Entey level reflex market. sent on January 08, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
