|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fiorenzo Fallanti www.juzaphoto.com/p/FiorenzoFallanti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M1 II Pros: ... All, resolution, scream stabilization, compactness and transportability, operating silencing.. Etc Cons: Little things and/or trifles that some people try to aggravate, (perhaps for some form of profit)... Opinion: Now I've tried many, the last brand was the Fuji. Nothing to say about the quality of its optics, but everything has changed since I found, to my enormous disappointment, a series of micromossi images that I adored.... Well, blessed that day that I got convinced by friends to buy the brand OLY with its stabilized bodies, from that moment around the world of images that I snapped has changed, but in particular I add to that host of amateur photographers and even Enthusiastic professionals of the excellence of Olympus stabilization. Street shots Freehand at 1/5 of a second, are beautiful and perfect almost not to believe, then its PRO lenses do the rest, let alone with the new flagship that in this field waste all. A news eye also to the silent operation that brings me back to my mind my Leica M6... I must also say that the quality 4/3 is enough and advances in my opinion to the vast majority of amateur photographers. This confirmed by some professionals who also do services for National Geographic... sent on February 02, 2019 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 III Pros: Amazing resolution of jpg, lightness, size, multifunctional too many, in my opinion a professional entry level Cons: Unimportant things, like lack of instruction booklet (which I fixed) I have to try harder to find something negative Opinion: Olympus system occhiavo a long time, something that take me back to the legendary years 70 with OM1 and 2 but the system 4/3 I created doubts especially for the rendering of files. Well this morning I went to Florence to take OLY om 10 MKIII with only 25 f 1.8 to try it out, and with the intention to confirm my doubts. Nothing more wrong, after taking a photo 30 I got home to try a bit of PP of my jpg. To my surprise the photos over to have a decent dynamic range enlarging with the surfer to PS to visually check the tightness, showed a perfect tolerance which I didn't think why wont my system Fuji. I must say that your PC screen fare at par and it put me in an uproar. I think September will be attracted to the new OLYMPUS after Photochina ... and then .... sent on April 28, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: Shooting speed, resolution, maneuverability, weight, high hold iso ... Cons: Currently undetectable of important Opinion: Already in possession of XPROII and XT1, I felt the need for an even lighter body to combine with the aforementioned professionals. Initially I was oriented for the new born XE3, but together with this my dealer of trust placed me on the counter also the T20 and after I picked it up I was immediately in love. Small, fast and super discrete gave me, while I was on the street, excellent files worthy of the older sisters. So I can safely say that the images produced are like the other Fuji I have. The XT20 has thus become my companion every day combined with Fuji 23 f2 that never detaches, and I have saved compared to the XE3 even 80 euros .... sent on December 24, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 R WR Pros: ..Solido, Incidentally, lightweight, silent, fluid, all that can please a street photographer .. Cons: For now I do not know, maybe the lens hood does not have that "certain something" that enhances the estretica optics of this kind ... Opinion: ... Taken the morning in the center of Florence, in the afternoon I immediately put under pressure. Well, as a solid feel and quiet operation is very similar to the 35 f2.rn Even in practice it has proved a stunning optics. Fuji has accustomed us to these results and never disappoints, a resolution that I always believe that they were taken with a full frame, even at times in certain lighting conditions (in my opinion) even better. Combined with my XE2, with optional lens hood (type leica) you around ports a lightweight tool, but always ready to capture moments citizens with its silent and sizes. recommended optical products, DO NOT MISS .... rn sent on November 02, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR Pros: Sharpness apotheosis, solid, raincoat, light ... etc., etc., etc., Cons: I still do not know Opinion: ... Recommend mutual friend Max, after seeing its Asian reportage, this morning I got up the whim but also because I had the need for a wide-angle WR, in a famous shop in the center of Florence I bought it. I immediately made a dozen test shots at apertures and I came home. Once you open the files with PS I was flabbergasted, a resolution F1.4 f2 and f2.8 stunning with a blurred by German optics. To think that in many years of photography is like I have pasted the aperture ring to 5.6 because this was the maximum aperture that I adoperavo even though I had professional optics. I must say that Fuji really made me go back to the periods (30 years ago) in which I was using a Leitz optics M6 and then the desire to try new shots. Not hear even the need for a stabilization for the reason of the above. Thanks Maxphotoparker thanks Fuji ... sent on February 25, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Pros: Extreme resolution, tropicalization, brightness, close-ups to be considered almost a macro ... Cons: yet to be seen ... Opinion: I did this morning morning a first exit to the mountains after I bought this gem last week. After a few shots, I knew I had to hand a real gem of war. Since the thin air did not allow me to make panoramic shots then I folded under particular close the season offers at these times of the cold weather. Fabulous colors, and as I mentioned optical razor sharp contrast with a decision, but not intrusive at the expense of various shades. For those who love the Fuji system it is ULTRASTRACONSIGLIATO ... Note that I had with me the 60 macro that remained on the stock exchange since with his older brother did everything ... sent on November 29, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR Pros: Small, incisive beyond belief, fluid movements of the past (see Leica optics), weather sealed ... Cons: Anything Opinion: Just caught this morning morning along with 90mm, I got to test it at home by clicking here and there. Well was a wonder in every tutto.rnGià just picked up I wanted to test the manual focus, moving, remember other times when I possessed the Leica with 35. Fluid, with the distinct feeling that both the micromechanics top. Focus Files and I took in af are fast and very precise, but the icing on the cake is the quality that Fuji has accustomed us. Do not forget the lightness and compactness that detract from the strength, but that I be invisible especially for street ... Ultra-straconsigliato seen the price ... sent on November 20, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: ..Risoluzione And its great detail, small, light, focus fluid reminiscent of other models zeiss .. Cons: For now, I could not find anything negative worth mentioning .. Opinion: As I said this in combination with the optical XT1 not does not make me regret the wide angle of the professional series of Nikon. Its resolution amazes you every day that I have no way to shoot. Incredible detail, natural colors with all possible shades (maybe even on the sesore Fuji) A winning combination and in the same way that discreet is passed almost unnoticed, especially if mounted on or XPro1 XE2. Not for nothing I've read many reviews also professionals with the capital "P" that almost hail this small but valisissimo wide angle ... sent on December 30, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: Image resolution, compact, light, fluidity of yesteryear Cons: For now nothing special .. Opinion: The other day when I said I was gone from full frame to this wonderful system Fuji, I raised a large crawl space. Well as I said I can confirm this, and starting from this wonderful handyman can tell you that is just magical, the compactness and the fluidity of the zoom ring and focus leave you that way that you once had with Zeiss optics, Leiz and other brands So famous for its compactness. As a resolution I have to say that after some testing has nothing to envy of equal optical focal Nikon or Canon owned by me, and in some cases even higher, especially in the corners. rnDevo try again 14mm, 27, 60 macro and 55-200, with XE2 and XT1, but if the buondì starts in the morning ...... sent on December 03, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 Pros: Resolution, light weight and relative portability .. Cons: For now only the lack of a small 18mm lens hood like that does so much "Leica" Opinion: ..it Was time that covavo uncomfortable with my Nikon and objectives for their size and weight. The other morning, intrigued by the positive reviews of Fuiji I went to a well-known store in Florence. The shopkeeper very helpful, made me feel a XT1 with the objective in question ..... and ... I was struck in the positive light in the first place, then for the quality of this small 27 mm. I must say I do not regret at all my expensive, heavy Nikon optics. The detail I was stunned, without loss at the edges. It seemed to be back to the early 80s at my glorious Olympus optics and bodies of the series M, still made with the metal and in spite of all read. Well they are about to buy 14, 18-55, and 6th micro along with a body XE2 alongside the XT1, and I will contribute to questre reviews as soon as I have tried ..... sent on November 25, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 200mm f/4 D ED IF Micro Pros: Resolution, robustness, availability of collar, blurred excellent, good balance ... Cons: Price, heaviness ... Opinion: I've bought this jewel of a lens with a little 'because in my series of professional missing, but especially having seen the surrender of macro photos of other photographers NPS. Although dated (Series D) I recommend it to those who want to take macro photographs with the capital "M", ie where it is required the maximum resolution, brilliant colors, but also for those who make special playing with the macro focus. What I like finding myself at around surrounded by nature is the feeling of extreme robustness, which brings to mind the objectives of a time (see Leitz, Zeiss). Surely for those who will go to the expense (about 1700-1800 Euro) will not be disappointed .... sent on June 13, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF 35mm f/2 D Pros: Light weight, excellent resolution, compactness, appropriate price Cons: feeling, but incorrectly, perhaps by the lightness of fragility due to those accustomed to the heavy professional lenses like me ... Opinion: As I said above, the weight of the optical depth. tiring with time, especially in the photograph the street. The 35 f1, 4, according to friends was quite heavy, and after f5, 6 / f8 made as the 35 in question. A friend of mine made me try it and when I saw the files on my PC open with Nikon view2 tripped the spring. Moral of the story, I saved more than a thousand Euro is the rendering challenge anyone to find the difference (resolution) between this compact and professional f2 35 35 f1, 4 ... sent on June 11, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Extreme sharpness, stabilizer new generation extremely useful, lighter brother 14-24, ability to mount protective filters, tropicalized money Cons: a little 'vignetting at wider aperture but corregibile with PS Opinion: As the wide-angle optics ... my favorite and also a fan of bad weather to make special shots, my layer (for quality) 14-24 has the protruding lens and then in my opinion (for my character) is not suitable to deal with rain, snow, etc.. The other day I bought the 16-35 and listen, listen, I was impressed by its resolution at the center and at the corners. I think, after several tests, which is higher than the house also homologous competitor with zoom lenses have always been problematic in the corners. This lens has also been chosen by the great nature photographer John Shaw. I recommend this lens to all those who want a professional zoom to a more affordable price ... sent on January 31, 2012 |
 | Nikon D5100 Pros: lightweight, adjustable viewfinder, quiet, impeccably made, some interesting features such as thumbnail images .. Cons: Plasticona although good quality .. Opinion: Its compactness and lightness convinced me to replace the compact that I always keep with me. Already from the first shots in conjunction with your cheap 18-55 I was pleasantly surprised. Nititezza, contrast and bright colors are the order of the day and sometimes does not regret the older sisters who leave home more often (at least that does not have specific requirements for work with the FULL FRAME), in fact after comparing files I would say that its 16.2 million pixels efficiently play their work, giving the pictures a very good quality. The final icing is the adjustable viewfinder which helps a lot in particular photos ... sent on October 16, 2011 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR Pros: Compact, lightweight, inexpensive, good resolution, optical handyman ... Cons: Attack plastic, not af fast, image stabilization improved, dim ... Opinion: This ugly duckling, despite what they say of "plague and horns" I must say that defends very well. After putting in a drawer compact and needing vision camera for photos of every day, I decided to buy myself the D 5100 for its compactness and lightness. The supplied lens was in fact the 18-55 VR. Already from the first moment I saw him writhed his nose as it is. Well, the first time I used I had to change his mind, after making a picture-postcard village of Chianti. The quite good, I'd say good resolution left me speechless. Back home I did a test with a perspective more expensive after placing the camera on a tripod. The result, listen, listen was almost perfect equality, and I say almost because my modest goal, in some cases gave me the impression of being in a bit more impact. That was lucky? After reading various reviews in a negative way in my little one, I have yet to understand ... sent on October 10, 2011 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: Excellent optical quality at all focal lengths, strength and impeccable build quality, tropicalization, convenient tripod collar that balances the weight after pairing the flagship D3 x S, At the top of the class Cons: Of significant weight, expensive for many, with its bulky hood ... Opinion: After you buy to make a professional hat-trick with the 24-70 and 14-24 are passed to the practical test after ever had a lot of satisfaction from a 70-200 manufactured by another company, the less light, less bulky but very sharp. The first few shots made me breathe a sigh of relief, engraving to scream great contrast to say the least. Photos taken with a very short time in a ford mountain in search of details. The outstanding balance has helped me for having this almost always taken in precarious conditions in the river. I recommend this lens to anyone looking hair on the egg ... sent on October 10, 2011 |
 | Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Excellent sharpness to the extreme corners, excellent contrast, sealed, sturdy, made with materials of first order (I saw a friend working with this lens in the pouring rain without any problem ... Cons: The weight and cost, the lens being protruding front must pay attention to scratches, also because it is not possible to mount protective filter Opinion: Optical certainly for professional use to combine with as many bodies to be properly balanced. During the first few shots I hit that reached the extreme sharpness of the edges unchanged. I consider the 14-24 a wide-angle zoom reference, so that the thing, after seeing the results of a friend convinced me to change camera system, especially because, taking 90 per cent with wide-angle lenses, these wonder full ... sent on October 10, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
