|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Axel09 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Axel09  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Construction, tropicalization, FN button on the barrel, sharpness, colors, focal range and constant aperture Cons: Heavy, big and suffers a lot of ghosts, Price. Opinion: tried in a day in full sun, we clarify ... the lens is a show, made excellent ... no FLARE ... but GHOST yes, inevitable with the sun in the frame ... you have to make eye and a some attention during shooting ... they are not excessive if well controlled, sometimes they can also give an added value if well managed (but they must like and it is a matter of taste) ... however, not easy to use ... not suitable for a beginner or a purist, the color rendering, sharpness and speed you AF are excellent, as a true lens PRO ... I will update later after a more intense use ... sent on February 14, 2018 |
 | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: Weight - solidità- ingombro- nitidezza- reduced distortion - brightness Cons: MAF manual Opinion: A lens amazing in relation to the cost ... mounted on the system Fuji X is fantastic, almost no distortion, excellent sharpness, light and compact .... you can not ask for more at a grandangolo.Se the maf manual does not scare you a lens must-have in the kit ... already from f4.5 setting the maf of a meter is iperfocale sent on October 01, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R Pros: Sharpness-Brightness-solid-costruzionern Cons: Hood inguardabile- weight-footprint Opinion: This is not a lens is any ... THE LENS ... I was amazed by the image quality and the sense of solidity in use ... for the first time I am in trouble in post (positive) in regulating the sharpness of Raw, I have to be look not to overdo it because it is a blade at all apertures ... bokeh, considering the focal length, is very nice and soft and very well also manageable in TA ... only sour note ... the hood ... for 900 € lens I would have expected something much more decent, the style of those of 1835, and 60 ... metal and at least a bit more discreet as it should be an ideal focus for the streetphotography ... certain is optimized to avoid flare and vignetting, but a little more care in design would not spoiled saw the final prezzo.In tHE lens is a spectacle, impossible not innamorarsene.rnAttenzione, is not a lens suitable for everyday use and must keep well that is a big, heavy lens, it is likely to get bored in the long run, despite the qualityare eccellentirn sent on August 05, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: SHARPNESS-rnCOSTRUZIONErnESCURSIONErnSTABILIZZATORErnTROPICALIZZAZIONErn Cons: BRIGHTNESS NOT ECCELSArnPESO Opinion: I had to hand this handyman and was pleasantly surprised by the overall quality of an enemy of Handyman lente.Essendo I tried it with disdain and skepticism expecting the classic lens for beginners lazy, however the quality of construction and image have surprised me for incisiveness and sharpness at all focal lengths, which is rare for a zoom questo.Chiaramente as the brightness is not its peculiarities, but otherwise is a lens ideal for those who want to travel with a single lens that allows him to take a little whole without too many compromessi.Gli dimensions are of some importance, but it could not be otherwise, comes to 135.Ha a very pleasing bokeh, I would say very good, and the colors and contrasts are significant to all focali.Come for the rest of the range even with this lens Fuji has crushed the competition by offering a handyman with a plus and it deserves that name doing dwarfing the teams of other brands ... sent on February 04, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/2 R Pros: dimensionirnpesorncompattezzarnqualitarnluminositarn Cons: loss at the edges in Tarn Opinion: I took this lens to be able to have something compact, lightweight, and most large to be attached to the 27th, just for fun .... turned out to be a lens satisfying, fast, well-defined diaphragms not too open that is worth more than what you think ... excellent lens for reportage and travel ... qualitatively valid, though not at the level of his brother, but not of being sfigura.Pur already has a wide angle fuzzy pleasant and well off the subject from the background. sent on January 23, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm X-T1 Pros: -Compattarn-Leggerarn-velocern-held high-quality immaginern stupefacentern iso-available comandirn-customization menurnrn Cons: -Duration Batteries Opinion: Son passed to XT1 after having for a year the XE1, if the first I was thrilled with this are more than happy and satisfied, it has everything that I look for in a camera, grades from FF in a compact body, excellent file, rapid in FA, nothing to envy to SLR, only the battery life is not perfect, but with a few € take batteries of competition and the problem is risolto.la control layout is intuitive and convenient as even the most noble reflex, but it is a matter of taste and abitudinma, but have physical controls, especially the principal, at your fingertips without having to search through the menus is priceless .... since the last update with the addition of the electronic shutter is really the top.Provata this is really hard to think back to a reflex.Consigliatissima! ps who you ask differences with XE2 say are innumerable, but I had tried handling the camera and its menu are not up to find, difficult and convoluted, in addition to lacking some accortezze.da prefer to unabashed though optimto XE2. sent on January 22, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 Pros: Size-Weight-quality image-bokeh-speed AFrnrn Cons: price currently a bit excessive in relation to the magnificent 35, which is more compact and a valid substitute, if he had half a stop more light would be perfect as her brother 18 Opinion: Purchased for a week, I've got to put it to the test conditions as the key backlight in low light and in the studio ... the lens is exceptional, purchased about 200 € for a highly successful bid at a store in New York, I could not hope for better ... the lens ideal for most everyday situations, focal perfect for street ... the minimum ingobro allows you to put my XE1 comfortably in the tray of the machine (far large) or even in the pouch ... makes the machine discreet and lightweight ... cosigliatissima to people like me who find the 35 a bit narrow in common ... rnbokeh more than pleasant, I would say very good in view of the relatively small opening compared his brother 35 ... a lens to have in the kit ... rnih against the lack of lens hood is not felt, and the result is excellent, with the sun in the middle of the shot flare generated is nice and manageable without ruining the picture or invade the scene ... rnal moment I can not find him obvious flaws if you do not overcharge the common market (my offer was the most unique rara) sent on March 29, 2014 |
 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Pros: Af velocernQualità costruttivarnNitidezzarn Cons: Slight difficulty of Maf diaphragms very open in low light conditions ... Opinion: I took this lens on Nikon d7000 to replace the old and good EX its predecessor and the jump in quality is remarkable .... delivers great clarity excel since the widest apertures, which is utilizzabilissimo, af quickly and accurately finally if not diaphragms very open and only under special lighting conditions, highly recommended, it costs a bit, but it really is a great lens ... rnIl Bokeh is phenomenal, as soon as I add shots taken with this lens and I update the recenzione for a more thorough judgment, in As I have a few days but I'm already satisfied piacebìvolmente sent on August 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF 24mm f/2.8 D Pros: Sharpness-price-quality image-brightness Cons: No hood (unforgivable on so short a focal length) rnpoca resistance to flare Opinion: I got this lens in its previous version (AF D) that changes only for the treatment of the lenses and flash synchronization, but are almost identical, the image quality is exceptional, the use of D7000, being a lens OLD STYLE is slightly less contrasted the current versions of G, but it is not always a bad thing, in fact, just a slight correction of the picture control in the car behaves very well, used is cheap and since the respective modern version of AFS is inaccessible this is a worthy substitute for those like me who like the fixed and does not want to compromise on quality. sent on April 04, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di II LD Pros: range of focal lengths for money Cons: little sharpness under 14mm and excessive distortion Opinion: is a good wide angle to begin without great pretensions, allows the use of filters but is unusable for 10 to 13 shots with side details (such as tree branches or similar) to the absolute lack of sharpness, good in the street if you agree distortion, support having an affordable price I find it still too high in proportion to the competitors by far the best. sent on January 02, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: -Sharpness-strength-brightness light-money Cons: -No aperture ring-fast autofocus Opinion: For the value for money is a lens absolutely fantastic, a must to have in your kit, I use it as a general handyman lens instead of the standard zoom ("the best zoom is your legs," he said as a famous photographer) as 18/55 or 18/105 ... bright, allows shooting handheld with low light, has a great focus and can also be used for portraits with the right precautions .. Consigliatissima to anyone who wants to venture into the world of fixed focal ... since I mounted hard I separate myself. sent on August 30, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
