|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Aznavour65 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Aznavour65  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 Nokton Pros: Material, dimensions, yield Cons: A bit slow in the Af with techart Opinion: A lens that was recommended to me and I immediately understood why. It has a magic of its own, you have to understand it before you have it in its perfect use, you have to fall in love with it to understand what it can do. Suitable for any type of photography you want. I have the Leica M version that I use with sony and techart, here alas the focusing time is obviously slower than a normal lens automatically, but for the results it offers, it is easily forgiven. Used with black and white photos is particular, because it returns a vignetting so beautiful that if some may not like it to me it drives me crazy. It is very sharp already at full opening but closing the diaphragm slightly cuts like a blade see this photo of mine (https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=3728431) just to understand. In short, since I have two Leica I use it much less but before I never detached it from my sony. The price in my opinion, knowing the price lists of other lenses, is also low compared to all its characteristics. It brings back a bit to the time of analog, both for the materials used, the shape and especially for the rendering of black and white images, if I had had it at the time of olympus on my OmDM5 it would have been a real gem!!! sent on November 06, 2022 |
 | Leica M11 Pros: Shrike Cons: It costs a bit Opinion: I tried this camera for a few shots at the leica store in Rome but I wait for a particular lens to return to try it as they suggested. So I don't have enough data to make a review but I can only say one thing. I had Canon Nikon Olympus Sony and I still own the Q2 and Q2 Monochrome. Well, I just had to turn it on and put my eyes in the viewfinder to understand what I had in my hands. I was convinced that I would never have wanted a Leica with manual focus, indeed I thought of taking the SL2, but after trying this I realized that it was immediately feeling. It was fantastic it seemed to have an analog in the hands that was missing only the roll inside, and the maf also quite easy to use as there is a transparent square in the center By acting on the focus the two images move away or approach, when they will be perfectly overlapped it will mean that the focus is precise that is nothing more than the operation of the rangefinder viewfinder that Leica does not He never gave up. Of course it is a slower process than an automatic fire, but of an irresistible charm. I've never seen such a beautiful, crazy viewfinder. To adjust my diopter, there are no classic knobs next to the viewfinder but the salesman added a small lens on the eyepiece that screwed to the same size right for my eyesight. Incredible! And then a dream began. I went to Piazza di Spagna a few steps from the store and I started to enjoy the shot, put the eye in the viewfinder, frame the subject, focus it and zac! This is a camera for amateurs, those who like to think about the photo before taking it. Oh, I forgot a gem that has no other camera. Inside it has a fixed memory of 64gb in my opinion very useful. Try it even if you don't plan to buy it... then you will tell me... sent on November 05, 2022 |
 | Sony FE 2.0x Pros: It does its duty Cons: Leverage twice as much diaphragms, but it's natural Opinion: I use it with Sony 200/600 G solely to photograph the moon. For this use is fine. It has a sharpness and AF speed that you hardly notice the differences on images where it has not been used. The diaphragms from the f/6.3 of 200/600 you get to f/13, but it is the serious defect of all teleconverters, and f/13 to photograph the moon is fine. I use the focal length to the maximum and I find no loss of quality. I don't think I'll use it for other types of photos because with the 200/600 you don't go for a walk, so for the use I make of it is fine. The price absolutely reasonable sent on August 01, 2021 |
 | Leica Q2 Pros: all Cons: for me nothing considering that's a compact Opinion: I have a high-quality Sony kit including the Sony A7RIV with a wholly 61 megapixels. But I needed a handbag camera, a high-quality compact to essentially make street of small weight and size. After a quick search here on Juza I had no hard time finding her. The Leica Q2, at least with its features, was the only one that could respond to my wishes. The price, however, was high, so before buying it I went to Leica to try it, two hours available, I needed one to understand that those 5000 euros were not due to the famous brand, but actually to the great quality of the camera in question. In 760 grams I had incredible potential in my hand. The camera with the indisputable material and aesthetics not comparable to any of the other brands, essential and simple in functions in rings and menus. Possibility of crop at 35, 50 and 75mm, the latter that I never use. Keep in mind that the crop at 50 mm always weighs 15 mb so excellent as quality. When using the crop in the fantastic viewfinder and on the display appears the entire frame with a frame that marks the limits of the mm. Chosen. The jpeg comes out cropped as it appears in the Camera Play the raw format (DGN) always appears framed but with the possibility of widening the margins up to the entire 28mm. Up to 3200 iso holds very well then alas you go directly to 6400 without middle ways, if not automatically. at 4/5000 iso surely it would still have been a great file. The fast and impeccable Af contrasted with Hd contrasts with jpegs that are more than acceptable. A very quiet shot, it doesn't have the double slot, but we are talking about a compact and I with a 128gb card I am doing great. The battery, renewed compared to the older sister holds very well. With the grip that I have mounted on it I hold it wonderfully in my hand, or there is the possibility to attach a ring finger to hold it hanging in my hand without the danger of it going to the ground. Do we want to talk about the lens? A summilux 28mm f/1.7, I assure you you could not want more!. It has the diaphragm ring directly on the lens like the old targetss and also has the macro function!! The colors are real very natural. Tropicalized, which for a compact is not for everyone and then an excellent stabilization in the car. It's exciting to hold it, which I didn't experience with any other nikon olympus and sony cameras even with a 40mm F/1.2 voilgtander hanging on it. It has a charm of its own and when you shoot in B&W I assure you it seems to be back in time. 10 and praise!!! sent on July 02, 2021 |
 | Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Pros: Quality, price, brightness, and above all lightness... Cons: Still nothing Opinion: I gave back my 70 200 GM to buy the 70 180 Tamron, but before you take me for crazy I tell you that I did it "only" for a matter of weight, unfortunately some back problem made me reconsider the choice on the Sony 70/200 f/2.8 GM lens to "fall back" on this Tamron. Well I have to say I'm not sorry at all. I'm not a professional so I can't evaluate the lens from a technical point of view but in the first holiday where he followed me to the Dolomites for 5 days always on me, well I have to say that I absolutely did not regret. Bright as the GM though with 20 mm less than they don't seem to weigh; the quality is great; the Af on my sony A7RIV remained the same, fast and precise even at low brightness; Lastly not in order of importance, it is the difference in weight that compared to 70/200 2.8 GM seems a lighter abyss. That's the wonderful thing that essentially rests on my choice and I would never go back to. Clearly for those who work with photography, and has the 70/200 GM will never change it and it does well because I know it is one of the best lenses that exists in the Sony lens park, we would miss it, but for those like me who like photographing on the street so many hours and the weight makes its difference, will not regret having the tamron 70/180. The lack of stabilization is not felt at all both because of the lightness of the lens and because it is used on an already stabilized machine. In short, for now maybe also because of the little time I have it I did not find negative points, and as Aznavour sang: ... forgive me if... sent on August 05, 2020 |
 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F828 Pros: By the time when everything came out Cons: By the time when nothing came out Opinion: I left this wonderful camera in 2011, and bought it in 2005 coming from a canon ixus v all aluminum 2-megapixel sooli. I took the last pictures on a cruise to the Nordic countries and took home some beautiful photos. Then the tilting lens was really a treat, allowing you to shoot in all directions from above from below and so on. Its lens is deadly a flash also powerful and I remember an infrared shot as well. In short, a great camera. Sure now it would be full of flaws, a small viewfinder a very small display, an even smaller sensor, but it was a few years that the first digital had come out so that was u little monster. There was the enthusiasm of digital and those who took with analogues like me appreciated the convenience of taking 1000 photos and being able to look at them. In short, 10 and praise for that period sent on May 04, 2020 |
 | Panasonic G9 Pros: Quality Material, tropicalized, grip that allows you to keep it in your hand perfectly since we are talking about a mirrorless, display and viewfinder of excellent performance, very fast and full of incredible features, excellent stabilization, double SD, excellent menu Rings and perfect controls, excellent video quality and excellent files to work, beautiful final colors Cons: The pictures are slightly noisy which might annoy people who love clean pictures Opinion: I have an Olympus 1MKII and with this I have made a very good coupled because the AF of the G9 far exceeds that of the 1MKII in precision and the area with multiple points is adjustable as opposed to the 1MKII which instead is his head. If It was not precisely for the graininess of the files (not excessive clearly) would be perfect. sent on April 20, 2019 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Nocticron 42.5mm f/1.2 ASPH OIS Pros: Sharpness, Bokeh, size, brightness Cons: Hood and Fabric case Opinion: A fantastic optics that I use with my three Olympus WCO M1mkii, M5mkii and M10mkii. It returns a fantastic image quality, with a sharpness even at full aperture excellent. The Blur is captivating considering that its 4/3 system is really hard to get it except with lenses with a aperture aperture like this. You can photograph freehand even with a non-existent light also thanks to stabilization. Here the Panasonic has done an excellent job except for the unjustifiably bulky and huge lens hood for the concerned and the absolutely useless fabric case, given the poor quality. Optics I use for the portrait but also for the street saw its brightness. sent on October 18, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, constructive quality Cons: lack of hood and a leather case like the other olympus targets Opinion: It is an absolutely excellent lens for both the quality of construction, including lightweight, and image quality that it returns. It has a wonderful bokeh, so soft enough to make me forget about the abandonment of the FF system, exceptional clarity even at TA, with a very fast, unstabilized AF like most Olympus lenses, due to stabilization in the car. Unique neo is the lack of a hood and a leather case such as PRO lenses, even though it is not part of the PRO category, despite the outstanding performance. sent on September 05, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: All in one !!! Cons: Nobody Opinion: Stunning lens with spectacular sharpness and excellent focal excursion. A 24 200 in 560 grams? Do not talk to me about the size and weight not even compared to 4/3 please buy otherwise light panasonic and plasticosis. The olympus constructs lenses with great materials and such a zoom could certainly not be smaller and lighter. I when I had the FF only the 50 sigma 1.4 weighed 800 grams. Someone says he did not even blur it. Well try it and you'll be amazed. I highly recommend buying. It's a travel goal then I have enough 2.8 to approach if I want but I know already that one of my three olympus does not detach it anymore !!! sent on August 12, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Lightness, construction, excellent images and unmatched price Cons: There is a lack of hood that if taken apart dearly expensive Opinion: A great lens for those who make macro so essential for the kit. The weight is non-existent, the price for the images it returns. It has sharpness, an impressive detail. It can be used for other purposes like the portrait for example but in my taste is a bit too hard especially for female portraits. Great for TA too, but like all olympus lenses, it offers great satisfaction. The price sent on June 12, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Sharpness, focal, robust, tropicalized Cons: It hampers very delicate and expensive in case it breaks Opinion: Excellent focal length equivalent to 80/300 if you take the MC 1.4 converter you will have a small 421 mm monster. Af / 4 constant. It delivers brilliant images and a great blur that for 4/3 is rare. Because of its focus its size and weight are absolutely reduced. With the 1240 pro it is the necessary coupling and ideal for those who use the zoom. Very good quality, great price for what it does !!! The only defect, as announced, is the hood which can easily be damaged and the cost of which is very salty (about € 70), though it is easily replaced by the home sent on June 12, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Versatility, sharpness, construction Cons: I would not know until now I did not find any defect Opinion: Great lens all to do, very sharp pictures great for all portraits, landscaping, starry sky, street. Tropicalized, robust beautiful to look at in metal but not exaggerated weight as well as all pro olympus lenses, for those who love zoom is irreplaceable, if you can do without a pro olympus, choose what you want but leave this I consider it essential. Absolutely fair price sent on June 12, 2017 |
| Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Versatility, sharpness, construction Cons: I would not know until now I did not find any defect Opinion: Great lens all to do, very sharp pictures great for all portraits, landscaping, starry sky, street. Tropicalized, ruggedly beautiful to look at in metal but from exaggerated weight as well as all pro olympus lenses, for those who love zoom is irreplaceable, if you can do without a pro olympus, choose what you want but leave this I consider it essential. Absolutely fair price sent on June 12, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Construction, sharpness, tropicalization Cons: It suffers to flare only with artificial lights then at night and fixed lenses, but normal for lenses like this in my opinion Opinion: A great lens that does not make me regret the 15 30 tamron f / 2.8 I had when I used the FF system. Sharpness, robustness, tropicalization, light and beauty of the images. The fact that it suffers a bit of flare can be solved at the shooting stage by putting your hand on the indicated side, on the other hand it's an ultra wilde and I think it's normal. Returns gorgeous essential colors to form the olympus triad: 7-14, 12-40, 40-150. I would highly recommend the landscape photographers and lovers to the starry sky. The price is absolutely honest for what it returns in full sent on June 12, 2017 |
 | Panasonic Leica 100-400mm f/4.0-6.3 ASPH OIS Pros: Image quality, design and aesthetic quality, fast and silent Maf, optimum stabilization with no noise at least on the Olympus M1MKII on which you use it Cons: Price in my opinion exaggerated, at 400 mm. Loses some quality but by closing one stop the diaphragm is recovering quite well. The unusual weight compared to the 4/3 system is otherwise a feather compared to the FF lenses. I had the tamron 150 300 weighed nearly 2 pounds more !!! Opinion: I did a number of pictures but to enjoy it enough I want to try it at some safari zoo to test it. I consider it a goal to keep in the kit but being a specialist lens (avifauna - naturalistic) is clearly not everyday. It has an exceptional blur of a powerful focal length, the equivalent of 200-800 mm that is safely carried around your neck without getting tired sent on May 26, 2017 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Sharpness at TA, great bokeh considering system 4/3 Cons: Maybe the price? Opinion: I had 50 mm sigma art 1.4 having taken off all the Nikon kit I could not replace the 50 with this. Those who complain of the weight to me are coming to smile, is half the sigma. However I essentially use it in portraits, excellent rendering, sharpness already af / 1.2 that does not exist in full size, fast focus and precise. I feel it better at sigma but for clarity and weight. Excellent construction as all pros sent on February 16, 2017 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Pros: Size, weight, high-definition shooting (40mpx) and functions as a live them time for photos at the starry sky (pretty much the picture is spread before your eyes on the display and when you decide to do just) live composite (I find it very good for the light painting), the camera is always open and you add a little light to the illuminated objects, 5-axis stabilization, allows you to shoot at previously unimaginable time, a quarter of a second free-hand, with the other impossible !!! Cons: menu a bit difficult, poor battery life and the autofocus a little loupe compared to my former FF but for the type of photography I do is fine. Opinion: I come from the Nikon D7000 and D750 Full Frame for those who know it, I put it on sale right here on Juza for the new flagship Olympus M1MKII. I have the omd - m 10 MkII and omd - m5MKII and I really enjoyed it. I took the Olympus triad 7-14, 12-40 and 40-150 all 2.8 and do great pictures. Shooting high resolution exceeds even shooting in the FF 750 but needs tripod therefore limited only to certain types of pictures, landscapes and macro for example. Since I 5MKII I have the joy of bringing the machine always with me with 12 of the 40 and the 7 14 and I will not run away any more photos. It 's true the quality of the iso is not comparable to the D750 but try with quest'utlima shooting with a 1/4 time type freehand is impossible with Olympus can with its stabilization gaming system in 5-axis machine, for me formidable. Best image quality unless you have a sick ball of going to see a larger image at 100% on the PC as is fashionable now, but they no longer speak of photography. If Vi remember for older like me when photographing in analog we were content with what it was printing the photo shop. So for those who print, perfect quality. For people like me who got tired of take 5 or 6 pounds of equipment on vacation then do the step I highly recommend it sent on December 15, 2016 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Pros: Size, weight, design, quality image, internal stabilizer that can also shoot at 1/4 second freehand, optical vast park on both economic and PRO Cons: battery life, slow in general than an SLR, at high ISO is a little hard Opinion: Possessor of FF, I bought for a small camera you always have in your bag. He has left me thrilled for image quality. I always say never sell my Nikon kit and actually I can no longer using it. Professional lenses are like those of Nikon, but cost half. The kit of the goals is fantastic. The thing that I appreciate is that despite not having a great performance at high ISO, can take pictures with low light as it has a stabilization system inside the camera exceptional. With the added purse 40-150 I do not get home anyway with back pain as with the nikon. It is the flagship of the Olympus, but I recognize that the quality of the files is excellent. Not Tropicalised but people who need this requirement should be on 5 MarkII knowing that though the quality of the files is the same or older sister EM1. I with two raindrops riponevo also the D750 in your bag, so for me the diskBear does not change. I'm in love with his vintage design, among other things I have the limited edition Brown, very beautiful. I recommend at least three batteries and the grip handle, for a man's hand takes to correct the size of a little "mini". The advice for budget travelers. E 'damn comfortable. One major flaw in the field of optical lack of choice for wide angles. Whereas the 4/3 system on which rests a 7 mm is equal to 14, the only wider wide angle is precisely 7 14 14 28 so that it would be that costs over 1000 euro.Spero more to come altri.Ha functions internal as the composite result that the live view with which you can take pictures of the stars or nocturnal easily develop seeing the photo as the display. In short, was born to a camera "second body" has become the only one that I'm using. sent on September 06, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
