|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rossano Di Prinzio www.juzaphoto.com/p/RossanoDiPrinzio  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica Elmarit-R 90mm f/2.8 Pros: very good. Well done. Robustness and precision in the Leica style. Crisp and full and real colors Cons: Maybe a little heavy, but you work well Opinion: I was looking for the 90 summicron F2 M series. I did great. I use it mainly on Sony 7R, but also on Panasonic GX9. A historical lens of 1964 that with the fender incorporated in a small glass to understand us first series made in Germany. Crisp to all diaphragms, typical Leica colors. Blurry maybe not like the summicron, but still very pleasant. The weight is felt, but very manageable. Also because you have to add the weight of the adapter. It's an extraordinary lens sent on April 05, 2021 |
 | Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20mm f/2.8 Pros: Colors. Almost non-existent distortion. Sharp from f5.6 up Cons: Full opening not sharp Opinion: What can I say? Considering age, it's a wonderful view. the absence of distortions or almost has incredible. The colors are full, saturated without ever being excessive. Great reading in the shaded areas.. and it's no small thing. Very good sharpness,but from F5.6 onwards. At full opening F2.8 is very soft especially you have edges. A slight vintage flavor, but not too much. I use it with satisfaction on Sony 7R and it gives beautiful images, with a slight vignetting, easily corrected, but which is sometimes pleasant. He suffers a little backlight, but given his age, I don't think we should be so demanding. The blurry is pleasant, it is not kneaded like many current wide angles. It is not very cheap, it can be found around 300 euros, but it is money well spent. N.B. M49 screw attack sent on April 02, 2021 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH Pros: Excellent sharpness. Full colors and never kneaded. Great at all diaphragms. Small and light Cons: Nothing Opinion: The lens looks very good, it is a pleasure to see it. But aesthetics aside from the picture quality is really remarkable. Good blurry even if it is a micro 4/3. The colors are the Leica ones.I really like the ring of the diaphragms on the head. I'd like the other micro 4/3 targets to have the diaphragm ring as well. Recommended sent on March 31, 2021 |
 | Leica Elmarit-R 135mm f/2.8 Pros: Deep, real colors. Excellent sharpness. Blurred. Built-in light screen Cons: The weight is felt Opinion: I use this wonderful lens on the Sony A7r. Found for little money. It offers spectacular images, worthy of Leica. The most amazing thing is that at full opening it is fantastic. With the right softness it is sharpness at the same time. If you close a little it is very sharp, but without being as annoying as many current lenses. Is that right. The colors are deep, very beautiful... well it's Leica. The blurry is dreamy, very progressive and legible. Fluid and precise rings. Maybe it weighs a little.... Patience... you can't have it all. Over-recommended sent on February 28, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: Af very fast and accurate. Lighter. Economical. Minimum distance Cons: Not very sharp. Bright colors, but mixed Opinion: I wanted to try this 30 mm due to its minimum distance macro and greater ability to use given that corresponds to a 60 mm, but I regretted. Nothing to do with his older brother 60 mm. I don't find that very sharp also the colors are strong and mixed. Take much advantage the micro contrast that has nothing to do with the sharpness. I'm disappointed and I think soon I will sell sent on April 08, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Well done. Tropicalised. Acceptable weight. Nitty enough Cons: Perhaps the price. A f4 is a bit soft, but that's fine for portraits Opinion: I read conflicting opinions. I believe it depends on the model. I find myself very well. It is clear at the right point, certainly not a blade. A f4 is less clear, but for the portrait is fine. Just close at f5,6 and everything improves. At 24mm it distorts a bit but nothing serious, easily solved. The colors are those Zeiss ... beautiful. Autofocus is quick and precise. Well balanced with 7macII. The thing to those who want to have a valid lens without excessive weights and encumbrances. If it cost a little less it would be the top. sent on March 10, 2018 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Quality / price ratio, sharp, relatively light, autofocus, stabilizer, blurred pleasant Cons: Hood "plasticky" although grafted well .... lack of housing. Opinion: I read a lot before deciding between 150-600c Sigma and Tamron 150-600. In the end I chose Tamron and I'm delighted. I read that to 600mm and 'soft and' partly true, but we are talking of a 150-600 to 950euro. It 's not fair to compare it to fixed lenses L-series Canon or Nikon, among other things cost much more' ... In the end even to 600mm with some PP solves everything ... or use F8 if possible. I use it with a Nikon D750 and go and that 'a marvel. Compared with the older 100-400 series The Canon I had with 6D and 7D I do not see any difference, but I believe it is best especially for blurred. The only really jarring and 'the lack of a rigid or semi-rigid bag included in prezzo.rnPer else advice ... if you do not want to spend many millions more' high. sent on December 14, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
