|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Tommys77 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Tommys77  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: Excellent focal length, fast and reactive AF, efficient stabilizer, tropicalization and construction Cons: Weight: It is a lens for many, but not for everyone, at least when used with a free hand Opinion: Good lens although at 600 mm it loses much of its brightness. Personally I was very disappointed with the purchase mainly because of the system's uneven weight and its unbalance on the tripod when it is at maximum focal ... it tends to be a boulder in any condition of usability humanly feasible.rn sharpness is discreet, But nothing remarkable, macrocontract is not, however, at the same level as the Nikkor 200-500 and it is known that macrocontrasto is one of the parameters to be considered when purchasing a cheap telly as this, in addition to the clarity that is more or less equivalent To that of his competing rivals. "I personally do not like the general rendering of color, too hot and slim for my taste, I dare say ... '' flat '' without brio, but it is also a matter of taste, Those who buy a similar lens do it especially for the convenience of getting up to 600 mm, not by the way .... for the other there is the great NikkOr 200-500 that throughout the focal range has a maximum af / 5.6 constant aperture and weighs 1 kg less than this brick .... of course, this has a full tropicalization and is equipped with a practical travel case Functional that the Nikkor does not have .... but when you take it in your hand and you realize that you can not keep it straight for hours and hours ... you think that you have made the wrong purchase and in all respects so It was in my case.rn I do not like the color rendering, the sharpness is just passable, the balance is poor .... it weighs like a boulder ... what else to say? I did not sincerely recommend anyone, but I did not like it at all. sent on May 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Light-weight optics, free-to-hand weight, discreet image quality, great versatility for a wide range of focal points Cons: Lightly plasticise construction cmq. Fairly solid overall, vignetting to TA at 24 mm and QI not superb Opinion: It is a good lens with no infamy and no praise, certainly versatile suitable for making light outputs where you want to bring with you only one optic that can solve most of the usual situations where from the wide angle you go to the middle tele .rn For me on D810 reveals cmq. A non-high, decent discretionary QI, certainly not comparable to fixed and bright optics, cmq. His work brings him home very well. It's a bit too much for what it offers, in many cases it's sold at 1000 euros, cost me totally unjustified and not in line with the optics offered. RnVignette at 24 mm so Very obvious, but just a small click with Photoshop and everything resolves, so I do not consider it a big handicap. This offers a wide range of focal points (from this point of view is unique) all with a fixed maximum aperture of af / 4, The sharpness at TA is good as well as the nice bokeh.rnVoto globale: 7 sent on May 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: Crazy definition and unlimited crop possibilities, no low pass filter, 24 Megapixel in Dx format Cons: Non-professional command management, presence of the '' wheel '' from entry-level and non-tropical body Opinion: Machine I've owned for several months and I know the features well. In some respects it is unique, it has a crazy definition comparable to that of the D810, but in Dx mode it is less than this D7200.rnSfora file is very clean and detailed if alongside optics of a certain level. I have never liked the management of non-professional controls, the classic 'amateur wheel' on many entry-level bodies that does not fit the quality of this great car. Also at 3200 ISO the baked files are great and cmq. very good . In my opinion, bursts and bursts would give a twist to even the D500, although the latter is considered a true '' pro '' and the D7200 is on a slightly lower step. Done a lot of times I happened to see photos shot with the D7200 that have nothing to envy to those made with the D500 (it also has 3 megapixels more than this) .... with a buoyIn light the difference in the 2 thinks and many times goes in favor of the D7200. In low light, of course, the D500 wins hands low and cmq. Has a more precise focus with a latest generation sensor that the D7200 dreams of. The non-tropical body (but rugged) is its point of view .... but in addition to the price it is proposed, It's hard to ask for more. On the whole, it's a super car that can give a lot in photographic shooting where I think it's still one of the best DX reflexes in circulation. sent on May 11, 2017 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: Sharpness, total control through buttons, 36 Megapixel no anti-aliasing filter Cons: Unremarkable Opinion: Amazing car from every point of view, does not lack anything except perhaps tilting the display even if I do not feel particularly the mancanza.rnE 'a machine which needs quality optics to achieve its full potential, coupled with' 'raw lenses'' is unbeatable at ISO 64 and in the presence of a good luce.rnImpensabile purchase a camera body of this level if you do not have appropriate lenses in my opinion. rnProvata with various set of '' Sigma Art '' is basically a blade even at full aperture; to do landscaping recommend the Nikkor 14 24 f / 2.8 or better yet the Zeiss Distagon 21 f / 2.8.rnBuona also for photographic hunting even though I have not experience with this kind of photography. sent on March 16, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
